A Season for Mischief and Conspiracy: A New Take on Christmas Charity

Critiquing the thick irony of the Christmas season is fair. It’s ludicrous that we celebrate the birth of the homeless baby Jesus by indulging in the biggest consumer spending of the year, scurrying around trying to find something to buy for people who have everything.

Nonetheless, there is something beautiful about giving, generosity and the contagious cheer that fills the world (not just the malls) during Christmas. We just need fresh imagination with how we celebrate amid the frenzy and clutter.

So we’ve started a new tradition here in the post-industrial concrete jungle of North Philadelphia … we call it the “Christmas Carol Conspiracy”.

A suburban congregation wanted to do something for families in our inner city neighborhood. We were all tired of distant acts of charity that do little to address the roots of poverty in a neighborhood like mine where we have a couple hundred thousand jobs in the last 30 years. We were all suspicious of do-gooder volunteerism that can so easily give a handout while pick-pocketing people of their dignity. And yet we were also convinced that inequity breaks God’s heart and should break ours, and that we have the power to do something about it. There must be a way to be more creative with giving money away than the corporations
are with getting all of it.

We prayed for imagination. And we put our minds together. Our goal was to practice generosity in a way that was so creative that even money would not corrupt the act of giving. (After all, Jesus said to be as shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves as we deal with the stuff of earth, like that green stuff that keeps things going but is always overstepping and trespassing on our souls.)

So the dreaming began. As we started plotting goodness, there were a few things we noted. The suburban folks had money and some of the folks in my neighborhood could use a little. The suburban congregation didn’t know how best to share the money in a way that protected the recipient’s dignity, and they had the humility to ask which was fantastic. Finally, we all knew that for some folks $500 would be a gift and to others it would be a curse.

Here’s what we came up with. A group of us who live in the inner city pray, and then come up with a list of a dozen of our neighbors who have had a particularly difficult year — like my friend who worked for the shelter which lost its funding and had to lay everyone off, or our neighbor whose house caught on fire, or the family around the corner whose 14 year old got pregnant this year. Then, we give that list to our suburban co-conspirators, and we let each family know to expect a little visit at a set time (though we keep the details of the visit on the down-low).

On the special night, the carolers roll through the neighborhood. They visit each home with some lovely singing, deliver a plate of baked goodies, and then they head out. They are long gone by the time the family has opened the envelope underneath the cookies — which contains several hundred dollars and a note that says, “Know that you are loved. Merry Christmas.”

Last year our little mischief-makers gave away over $10,000 to families around the city. And the cool thing is the families do not even know who they are. They don’t even know the name of the congregation and may never see them again … all they are left with is a little reminder that they are loved.

So let the Christmas Conspiracy spread.

Imagine if every neighborhood had a little conspiracy like this one, and imagine if every suburban congregation began plotting goodness with folks in poverty.

Do an anonymous act of love this season.

It was the Christ-child who said, “When you give, do it in secret … don’t even let your left hand know what your right hand is doing.” It is an invitation to mischief — sort of like the old “ring-and-run” prank we played in high school, only better.

This mischief is holy mischief. It is a divine conspiracy. It is about reminding the world that it is loved. And that seems to be what Christmas is all about.

—-
Shane Claiborne is a prominent author, speaker, activist, and founding member of the Simple Way.  He is one of the compilers of Common Prayer, a new resource to unite people in prayer and action. Shane is also helping develop a network called Friends Without Borders which creates opportunities for folks to come together and work together for justice from around the world.

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

Print Friendly

About the Author

Shane Claiborne

Shane ClaiborneShane Claiborne is a prominent author, speaker, activist, and founding member of the Simple Way. He is one of the compilers of Common Prayer, a new resource to unite people in prayer and action. Shane is also helping develop a network called Friends Without Borders which creates opportunities for folks to come together and work together for justice from around the world. His most recent book is Red Letter Revolution, which he co-authored with Tony Campolo.View all posts by Shane Claiborne →

  • Benmanben

    That’s a very nice idea.

    It is nice to see an idea for charity on here instead of socialist propaganda called charity.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/6TMWGADCHW3VVQNLI3PRTGFSRY Cynthia

      Quick reminder: socialism means not believing in private property, and that all major industries are controlled by the state. Not even the welfare states of Norway, Sweden, and Finland have socialist governments: they have very strong private property protections, and the government only controls a few key industries (military, oil, etc.)

      Don’t know what you mean by “socialist propaganda called charity.”

  • Beachcomber10

    Love Christmas Conspiracy! 

  • http://objektivaufunendlich.de/ Tom

    thanks for sharing this nice idea,
    greetings from germany, tom

  • Cathy

    What a great holiday gift for everyone involved…  :-)

  • Kayla

    It’s just like the layaway angels. People all over the country are going to Walmart and Kmart and paying off people’s $20-100 dollar layaway charges for others’ kids clothes and toys and then leave so that when the people show up to pay on their tab, they find out that someone has generously paid it for them.

  • M G

    For me the problem is the short term nature. A good business person could turn that $100 into $1000 and employ someone in the process. How can we make very long term solutions to employ poorer folks in ways that are better than their current employment?

    This is a question that is on my mind lately and why im studying hard to become a successful entrepreneur..

    • Drew

      Both approaches go hand in hand, M G.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/6TMWGADCHW3VVQNLI3PRTGFSRY Cynthia

      A good business person is not one that employs people, poor or otherwise; a good business person is one that maximizes profits. That is the fundamental nature of our economic system, which is why, to some degree, we are in such hot water.   Even if you’re a humane person who wants to help the poor by providing jobs in your community, you still have to compete with the guy who is willing to automate processes or send jobs overseas in order to improve profits.

      That’s why we need government on our side to reward those businesses that do employ people in their communities. Otherwise, in the jobs generating arena, we can’t compete with countries like China, whose people have few political rights and little economic leverage.

  • Drew

    Shane, I’m very glad that you post on here.. keep up the excellent work.

  • http://hst.edu/our-community/faculty/oster/ Richard Oster

    Let’s get our history straight; Jesus’ parents, and therefore “baby Jesus,” were not homeless.  They, like so many other Jews in that region, were away from home to comply with a federal order on census and taxation.  All the motel rooms [Luke 2:7] in Bethlehem were already taken by the time they arrived.  Their tardiness in getting a motel room away from home [Nazareth] hardly makes them “homeless.”  This “homeless” notion is merely revisionist history, similar to the inaccuracies seen in the perennial December attempts to cast Mary and Joseph as “refugees.”  They merely had to go to Bethlehem “to register for the census, each to his own city” [Luke 2:3].  

  • Rsfankhauser

    Why make stuff up to help your point? Plenty of ammo to support the materialism of Christmas, but Jesus was not homeless. Sorry, Shane – you missed it on that point. His father was a carpenter from Nazareth, every indication being he had a home and business… the only reason he was “homeless” that night was because they had to travel to Bethlehem for the census. It’s more akin to (without sounding too sacrilegious, I hope) to “The Holiday Inn was full!”. The wise men traveled to find Jesus “in a house (Matt. 2:11). 

    The rest of the post was fine, even challenging. But don;t make stuff up to fit your goal. 

    • Tate Randall

      For his ministry he was a homeless nomad. Traveling from town to town with “no place to lay his head” (Matt. 8:19). Perhaps he is not homeless in the same way that people have become homeless through unfortunate circumstances today. Jesus’ homelessness was a choice. I think it was an example of simple living and sacrifice.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/6TMWGADCHW3VVQNLI3PRTGFSRY Cynthia

      Rsfankhauser, you must have missed Richard Oster’s post, which was just previous to yours. It covered the very same topic. You made the point….again: Yes, Shane was very, very bad. He mistakenly called the holy family “homeless.” It was not an error on his part, but part of a nefarious plot.  It was very good of you to point that out to him, and to call him out on making up stuff to help his point (Although I don’t know what exactly his point was vis-a-vis calling the holy family “homeless”).
       
      Shane’s blog was 725 words long. It was about finding new ways to help the poor without depriving them of their dignity. I cried while reading it. And you chose to use your posting space to critique the word “homeless”? 
       
      You did, at the last, give a slight, but disdainful nod of approval at the very end: “The rest of the post was fine (I can hear the sniff, sniff from here); but, doh, Rsfankhauser, you had to go ahead and ruin it by once again by impugning Shane’s character –”But, don’t make stuff up to fit your goal.” 
       
      I’m not a Christian (maybe you could tell that by the snarkiness of my post), but I sure admire what these Red Letter Christians are doing. It makes me consider returning to the Church.

  • M G

    @Shane Claiborne Can we get a 1 year update? As we approach xmas season I’d be interested in hearing how it fared last year.

×

TRENDING: The Disturbing Trend of Christian Self-Deprecation >>