Anti-Gay Marriage Legislation is an Example of An Overextended Church in Decline


Photo credit: 2006 cbamber85/flickr. Use does not represent endorsement by the photographer.

No longer content to govern itself, the church has spread out to rule the culture through legislative force, attempting to use the tools of government to order the lives of consenting adults. Like an empire, the church finds itself on patrol beyond its rightful territory, which is shocking when one considers how much space the church has been given, by God first and this country second.

The church already possesses the freedom to engage the culture through dialogue, art, the marketplace of ideas, hospitality, care, and robust teaching. We have the right to share and live the good news of Christ resurrected. We have the reach to notice, defend, and love the orphans, the widows, the poor, the hungry, the outcast, the falsely condemned, the unjustly treated, and victims of violence and coercion. We have the liberty to love our neighbors and our enemies. We have Micah 6:8:

And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.

Why is it not enough?

The state of discontent in our faith is not the fault of the GLBT community. Perhaps we have become discontented with the humility and quietness of actual faith and ministry. If so, this is tragic. In a culture embracing unhinged consumerism, it is not surprising that the church would grow bored of the feast of ministry, moving on to snack on private affairs within the broader culture.

In a quest for church strength and national longevity, our cultural conquests are making the church and the nation weaker and more divided. In a crusade for a more wholesome culture, we have injected pride, arrogance, hostility, and vitriol. Even those who respectfully stand against an issue that is at most a symbolic victory have contributed to the creation of unnecessary foes.

Justice for the abused and disadvantaged rather than the consensual

I have heard gay marriage argued against with the example of Nazi Germany, by people asking “where was the church then?” They say genocide is what happens when we fail to act on our morals as a church. I find it troubling that this is even considered a valid comparison to the GLBT community’s wish to marry. One is force, the other is consensual. Force turns sex into rape and employment into slavery. This is why the church is universally applauded when it combats sex trafficking, and esteems people otherwise harmed, neglected or left behind, because in those moments the church is elevating the individual rather than trying to restrict it.

This is why Christians must find that tension between being completely disengaged from the broader culture, or consumed by it, and consumed can come in different forms. One form tries to water down personal faith to the extent that he or she is indistinguishable from the broader culture. Another tries to fashion the culture to look like his or her faith. The latter is what we see in the anti-gay marriage movement.

The church has been here before (and survived)

The reason no one will be making the argument against gay marriage in twenty years is the same reason the average person would not be in agreement with Christians advocating for laws against all alcohol consumption, tattoos, or cursing, even though some Christians sincerely view those as sins and have what they feel are the verses to back it up.

Go with me a step further, those of you who are against gay marriage in the broader culture, and let me attempt to discuss this on your terms over the next three paragraphs.

Remember the fight against pornography? The Religious Right lost that battle too. But while pornography rakes in billions of dollars in the U.S. annually, the church has not been silenced. In fact, the church has quite a multifaceted approach to the problems stemming from porn. The dangers of pornography are still preached from the pulpit, churches offer counseling or connection with counseling services for porn and sex addicts, some churches exist solely to befriend those within the adult industry as well as those men and women recovering from their participation in the production or consumption of porn, and non profits are built to walk with women who have been harmed by their experience in the adult industry. It’s by no means a perfect example, but I hope those of you who disagree with gay marriage in the broader culture see this point and will reconsider your approach: while porn is here, so too is the church. Sometimes, I think losing the culture battle is the best thing for the church, so that it can remember its place and then get back to its calling.

When you look at Christ, do you see Him forcing teaching or standards of living on everyone? He taught people to seek- as Rev. Earl F. Palmer said so correctly- seek is a freedom word. That means ministry is intended to grant people the dignity of choice as well as our patience. These ideas can be held along with the charge to go and make disciples.

Jesus also told stories. He was silent at times, refusing to answer. Or he answered questions with other questions. He went where he was welcomed, and often retreated from the crowds or the mobs. Hardly an in your face kinda guy. When Jesus did chide, it was most often reserved for the religious know-it-alls and fruitless trees. Christ also raged when he witnessed a perversion of the church, and if you see gay marriage in the broader culture as the same thing, you are forgetting to remember that this nation is not your personal house of worship. That’s what your house of worship is for. It’s time to stop trying to force other people to eat your vegetables. Gay marriage is no more a threat to your marriage than the divorced neighbor or the guy down the street who just had an affair. The greatest threat to your marriage is what you and your spouse do or don’t do with it.

“You’ve confused a war on your religion with not always getting everything you want. It’s called being part of a society. Not everything goes your way.” -Jon Stewart

The point of it all: fruit, not culture feuds

Belief in Christ is a transformative journey, producing fruit and a sincere effort in obedience, and while the fruit, or goodness does not save us, it is a sign of Christ’s transformation in those who believe. Belief must produce a new motion in our lives, and not towards every endeavor we happen to bless, but towards actions which bring glory to God.

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. -Galatians 5:22-23

The church mistakes earnestness for righteousness. “Well as long as I’m using scripture to back it up.” Did Jesus accept that justification from the religiously earnest who knew their religious law and used it as a disproportionate weight on the backs of others? The epidemic problem in the American church is that we have become “position people,” swapping faith for a mental concept, and mistaking ministry for being on the correct side of an issue. This is my guess as to why the church is so often absent on matters where it is actually needed, because we have become satisfied with the notion that we just need to think correctly and tell others to do the same and God will smile down on us all.

We can know The Good Book like a pro, and still fail to live the point of it all. The Bible, if mishandled, can further a person’s quest for power and control. So what is the fruit of fighting against gay marriage in the broader culture? Because the anti-gay marriage culture warriors are making enemies whether they mean to or not. This isn’t to say those who oppose gay marriage are incapable of producing fruit elsewhere; it is to say that the church movement to stop gay marriage in the broader culture has been a largely fruitless campaign.

I once saw a photo of a protest sign at a pro-equality rally in Seattle that read “focus on your own family.” That is Biblical advice. It is the work of God through his spirit that changes hearts, not the church as the Morality Police, especially not when we focus on the deeds of consenting adults in the broader culture, and most certainly not when we try to enforce it by way of legislation. We’re getting our kingdoms confused, and that is not salt nor light.


Ian Ebright is a former film critic who now writes about faith, life, culture and human rights. You can read more by visiting his site The Broken Telegraph, or follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

Print Friendly

About the Author

Ian Ebright

Ian EbrightIan Ebright is a former film critic who now writes about faith, life, culture and human rights. You can read more by visiting his site The Broken Telegraph, or follow him on Facebook and Twitter.View all posts by Ian Ebright →

  • tarl_hutch

    I am kind of afraid to be the first to post on here, but here I go anyway…
    Ian,
    You have taken the words right out of my mouth. This is one of the main arguements I have been making for months now. Thank you for writing this and for furthering the conversation.
    Morgan’s post yesterday is a very tidy bookend to the same thread of thought. I am sure this was probably done purposely, but it still helps drive the point home.
    Why do we Christians think we must rule government and ignore our God given duty to be that odd, unique, inspiring, community? As you say we trade away our most vital tools, when we seek to pick up the sword of empire.
    Now one inevitible question is, how then should Chrisitans view their roles as citizens and their votes in government? Should we abstain from governmental positions and from voting? Or should we continue to care about our legislative issues, while transcending the tendancies of secular arguement, seeking instead a gentle and peace filled way? Or is their another way that I am missing all together?
    Thank you so much for the focus on the fruits of our actions and how we should look at what fruit our current idealologies are producing. I am really interested to hear what others think about this topic, but hopefully we will all keep in mind what fruit we wish to grow from our conversation.

  • Dave

    I applaud this post! I find myself enjoying and being challenging by the way this issue is being looked at. I imagine it is a similar lens that was used when slavery was challenged or during the woman’s suffrage movement or other social issues that the church has changed it’s understand about.
    As a member of the body of Christ and the LGBT community, it grieves my heart when the LGBT community responds to situations they disagree with in anger, cursing and return hate with hate. One of the early teachings of Jesus was to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute you.
    It has become quite obvious to me that the church is in a new day; if we are not open to new understandings of scripture we run the risk of becoming the new order of Pharisees. It’s not always easy to recognize what God is doing and we tend to want to defend what we know and are comfortable with.

  • Don Dawson

    Very good message. From the perspective of society at large, it really doesn’t matter whether or not we, personally, support gay marriage, but our behavior toward the world around us speaks volumes about who we are and what we really believe.

  • Anonymous

    Oh no……..

  • http://ricbooth.wordpress.com Ric

    Excellently stated, Ian Ebright. The phenomenon of legislating our latest variant of Christ from on-high has afflicted the church since Constantine. We need to recognize it, own up to it, and return to our calling.

  • Nick Peters
  • Kyle

    While I am against gay marriage and an advocate for helping homosexuals find Christ, I agree with many of the points in this article. The church in America needs to understand that we are in the world and not of it. We still need to remain vocal on moral issues like marriage and abortion but we need a major culture change in the church that ceases to lord these two things over society. Rather, we need to acknowledge that obedience to Christ first comes through belief in Him. We cannot assume that people who do not know Christ can properly obey Him.

  • Anonymous

    Ian,
    I think you make some good points here, but I want to ask you a question. Many Christians look to scripture to give guidance on all sorts of political issues from the environment, to taxes, to poverty, to civil rights to abortion. I know you’re not saying that Christians should not try to get laws on these issues reflect their faith values; at least I assume you’re not. But then why is gay marriage different in your mind? Why is it acceptable, for example, for Christians to promote a higher minimum wage as law (“forcing others to eat our vegetables”), but not our views on what marriage is? Is it all based on how many enemies we make in the process or how others view the church? Should we only fight for truth on issues that won’t make us look bad to the secular culture? What are your thoughts?

    • Ian (the author)

      Hi Sam, you are correct, I am not asking Christians to be totally disengaged from political action. that would be unwise. much good can come about through political means.

      great question! There is no short and sweet, magic bullet answer that I know of, but I did point to something in the post that works as a beginning to that conversation: that the church be involved politically in things that first help the disadvantaged, victimized, coerced and oppressed rather than focusing to govern the deeds of the consensual. so laws creating a more just, fair, equal, open society. now the problem is two sides will define those things differently, but I think that’s a good criteria and conversation to be having, rather than “what gets me personally the best deal out of government.”

      If I’m not mistaken, you read and commented on my Obama Admin post recently, and those pros and cons might give you a glimpse of the kinds of issues I feel comfortable being for and against. i have bronchitis so I’m not in great shape to continue this conversation at this time but I hope I gave you something for your great questions.

      Until next time,

      ian

×

TRENDING: Five Reasons Christian Parents "Lose" Their Children