Hipster Pharisees

Here in the suburban South, new churches sometimes seem like a dime a dozen with many church plants meeting anywhere from shopping centers and warehouse buildings to schools and homes. Often these pastors sport jeans, a polo and maybe even some converses – just for good measure. The lights are bright, the PowerPoints twist and twirl, and a coffee bar greets you at the front door.

Some media outlets have also caught onto the trend, describing pastors like Mark Driscoll of Mars Hill Church “hip” for donning distressed jeans. And while prominent evangelical church pastor’s like Rick Warren and, Atlanta favorite, Andy Stanley may not quite meet the criteria for “hip”, their services look more like a concert for the latest vest-adorned rock band than your grandmother’s choir.

Some call it a way to reimagine church. And there is no doubt that evangelical’s willingness to experiment with everything from worship to marketing can be beneficial. But, while some are convinced that this kind of service is the means to attracting today’s generations to the pulpit, this Millennial couldn’t disagree more.

Sure they had me at first. I had fantastical visions of going to church in jeans and a t-shirt. It felt like an attempt to shed the “old” ways of the baby boomers and finally find a comfy place to lay my tush in church (because who ever thought pews were comfortable anyway?). But as soon as the initial excitement of electric guitars and flashy lights started to fade, I quickly realized that, like finding a sheep in wolves clothing, they had hidden the same old post-seventies, right-wing hijacked reinterpretation of Christianity behind converses and a V-neck. There I was, sans-heels, listening to the same thing I had grown up with. I guess even the isolating tendencies of gender essentialism and white privilege can seem cool in a shiny new package.

And that was when I disengaged. I couldn’t keep disguising the cringes my body had in church as it revolted against notions of how women are naturally more emotional and nurturing than men or those white-privilege-filled, individualistic stories about overcoming adversity that never deal with the reality of structural constraints on people’s lives. I couldn’t keep raising un-callused, inactionary hands in praise of a God who seemed to care more about materialism and capitalist theories on proper marketing methods than the poor, the oppressed, the widow and the orphan. The same God, of course, who seemed to also prefer his followers combat the most segregated hour of the week with assertions that “All people are God’s people” instead of demanding that his followers change and educated themselves first to combat racial and economic inequality inside and outside their buildings.

With time I would learn that all of Christianity is not filled with hypocrites, and even the worst of the hypocrites are no more imperfect than I am. But the fact that I still have to reckon daily with comments like Mark Driscoll’s now infamous gender essentialism, churches across my regions failure to actively engage in the reality of racial injustice and a slew of hipster Pharisees coopting my generation in a version of Christianity so divorced from the gospel of Jesus Christ that even laser displays and Twitter can’t hide their hypocrisy, is more than a little disconcerting to a Millennial who really thought we knew better.

—-
Erin Echols is an Atlanta native and graduate student in Sociology with special interest in racial inequality. You can find her online or on Twitter.


Print Friendly

About the Author

Erin EcholsErin is an Atlanta native and graduate student in Sociology with special interest in racial inequality. You can find her online or on Twitter.View all posts by Erin Echols →

  • http://7sentences.com Andrew Brewer

    I can totally relate. My wife and I have been overwhelmed since moving two months ago to Colorado and searching for a new church to get involved at. There’s so much emphasis on being attractional, but how many are actually doing what they preach? Church is now often treated as being what happens inside the 4 walls of the church building, but it didn’t used to be that way. Scripture describes church as a mission, a movement, and a community — not an event. What’s happened to the way we do church?

  • Anonymous

    It’s not just in the South; we have our fair share of these types of methods in the North as well.  People want authenticity and what these churches have done is anything but authentic.  So out of touch are they with what people are really longing for, they assume that by changing the packaging that will be sufficient.  It’s almost an insult to one’s intelligence to assume that they won’t figure out the church for what it truly is.  There’s an old saying about dressing up a pig and it’s still a pig.  If anything, I think people would be more drawn to a church that is earnestly trying to work out its doctrine and practices versus just simply doing window-dressing.  But as most of us do, the churches have fallen for the easy work–changing the outward.  However as one who has served in leadership at a church that tried to make some of these changes, I can tell you these outward changes don’t come easy in churches that fight the relaxing of dress codes, coffe cups in the sanctuary and the like.  One would think actual doctrinal changes were being made by the reaction of some to even these changes.

  • Jstevemiller

    Good, heartfelt, challenging thoughts. One thing I love about the Christianity that Jesus and the early church modeled, was that it didn’t isolate itself from criticism. Jesus didn’t isolate himself in a commune with his followers. He taught out in the open, where people could reply, retort, get heated, and discuss his ideas. And each local gathering of believers is supposed to have people who have gifts like teaching and wisdom – not just the pastors – thus making the church, at its best, a place where ideas and opinions are welcomed. It’s challenges like this that church leaders need to take to heart and debate.  

    I share your concerns with a suburban Christianity that seems to mimic the values of society at large. But I’m not sure that the problem is peculiar to “hip” churches. From my admittedly limited experience, I see some traditional churches and some nontraditional churches that seem married to materialistic, status quo ideals. Equally, I see some traditional and nontraditional churches who are actively involved with relieving suffering and helping to correct society’s ills.

    So I think both the traditional and nontraditional churches should continually examine themselves in the light of Jesus’ typically disruptive teachings. If everyone’s comfortable with our services and ministries, something’s probably wrong. Jesus often made people uncomfortable, and suggested that His followers would do the same.   

  • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

    I usually associate hipster Christianity with more progressive churches. These are usually the churches more involved in community outreach, global missions, and social justice issues. It’s usually the mainline denominational, suit and dress wearing, fundamentalist churches that I have discovered to be more introspect and self-serving. This is just a personal observation since I have been an active participant in both of these types of churches. However, there are always exceptions to the rule. And, we shouldn’t make sweeping generalizations or false presumptions. I have also seen hip churches remain stagnant and mainline denominations taking the lead towards serving others. Nevertheless, we must love one another, be of encouragement, and enjoy the great diversity that make up… the Body of Christ.

    • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

      Hey Greg, I replied to everyone above, and I think it addresses some of your concerns. Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!

      • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

        Thanks Erin. Your reply does clarify a few things.

        I do have a hard time agreeing with you though. I believe you are making unfounded generalizations. Here’s why…

        This is because I belong to a predominantly white, upper class, hip, suburban church that is on fire for Christ. This church is highly involved in community outreach, racial reconciliation, global missions, and social justice issues. They are in partnership with a handful of ministry organizations around the world (i.e. IJM, Orphan Outreach, and World Relief, just to name a few). So, while I agree that there is likely a good many white suburban churches with cool pastors of middle to upper class society that are not actively involved in engaging people and tackling social issues around the world… there are also a good many who are.

        I pray and hope you will find a church someday that fits this criteria.

        • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

          Right. I am aware of churches like that. Jay Baker’s church, for example, might be a good example of a “hip” church that has substance.

          Again, this has nothing to do with hip being a bad thing or always being associated with a lack of substance. I never intended to imply that. It has to do with understanding that people can’t repackage bad church, call it cool and think they achieved something.

          Maybe it is the comment that says “a slew of hipster Pharisees coopting my generation in a version of Christianity so divorced from the gospel of Jesus Christ that even laser displays and Twitter can’t hide their hypocrisy” that makes things unclear. I am NOT saying all hip Pastors are Pharisees. I am saying there are some hip pastors that my friends think are reimaging church when really all they have done is dress differnt and play rock music to hide the same old hypocracy.

          Worship style or attire is not an issue for me. People should wear and worship in different ways. But not just as a gimick. And not in a way that embrasses materialism or maintains the status quo.

          • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

            Aha. I think I got it now. Thanks.

            BTW, please tell me more about Jay Baker.

          • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

            Here is his site: http://jaybakker.com/about

    • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

      Hey Greg, I replied to everyone above, and I think it addresses some of your concerns. Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!

    • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

      Hey Greg, I replied to everyone above, and I think it addresses some of your concerns. Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!

  • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

    Thanks for the comments and Tweets so far everyone! As a few of you mentioned bellow, this trend is not limited to the south, the suburbs or “hip” churches. This is particuarly not an attack on thinking outside the box a little when it comes to church. What I am arguing is not that electric guitars and converses are bad (I own my own), but that they are not the end all be all and my generation (at least I hope) is not so nieve as to be fooled by the same old stuff dressed in new clothes. Some people seem to think that rock music will attract the young folks. And maybe it does for a while, but when the rock music is accompanied by materialism, inaction and a failure to grapple with the issues of our day, it isn’t good enough.My husband (a gen-x-er) and I, for example, go to a very traditional church. And sure we wish the pews were more comfortable and laugh when the chior sings a gospel song like it is Bach, but we go there because the church is committed to a larger cause. Committment to justice beats out “hipness” anyday. And, frankly, traditional or non-traditional, this gender esstialism and white priviledge stuff has simply got to go. It pushes me further and futher away everyday we let it keep happening in our churches.

    • http://GraceEmerges.blogspot.com BradleyD

      Eric, thanks for your article.  What about the huge investment we (customers of churches) are making to produce these extravagant weekly events?  Couldn’t we use the time, money and opportunity to build something more useful?  We could spend less of our time (that we spend with other believers) watching a stage, and more time with  other believers actively discussing our faith, helping each other with encouragement, organizing on how to meet the needs of our community, and actually doing the work to meet needs. 

      So, part of my problem with the current church is that we spend 90% of our resources doing nothing very deep or spiritual at all!  Maybe 10% on real relationships and collaboration.   It’s a waste!

      • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

        Bradley – Good insight. Instead of churches spending an hour facing forward listening to one man/woman talk on the stage, why don’t we spend that time together in fellowship and learn how to build our faith together. There is so much untapped talent, wisdom, and gifts in our churches today because everyone thinks we have to listen to one pastor. The one thing our churches are lacking these days is community.

      • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

        Thanks for reading and for your comments! – Erin

        • http://GraceEmerges.blogspot.com BradleyD

          and on gender roles, again “what a waste!”  Not only a waste but an insult.  The church needs to wake up to what we’ve done to women and try to make it right.  Thanks for sharing your other blog post above.    

  • Anonymous

    Church is what we make It.  If we (as God commands) want to witness, serve or do anything that promotes Biblical principal and you are not encourged by your fellow churchgoers and pastor –  run as fast you can from that  stagnant body of hypocrites!  Read Read Read and truly pray for wisdom through the Holy Spirit to guide You and all Christians in a path worthy of the Blood Jesus shed for US!!!!!

  • mike

    My hipster church nevers stops telling me how bad America, captailism, wealth, and  white Christians are. Its just they had hidden the same old post-seventies, left-wing hijacked reinterpretation of Christianity behind converses and a V-neck.  Maybe we should swap churchs.

  • http://twitter.com/mandymartyn mandymartyn

    I feel your pain and I appreciate your passion, I love your passion..
    However:
    I have recently had my eyes opened to the way my dislike for “those” types of churches was making me feel about people I am called to love and not judge. I Have often described myself as a “victim of fundy cult abuse” (harsh right?) As I grew up, it occurred to me, my knee jerk reaction to hate them was coming from being told how to think. One of my favorite things about Jesus is that He encourages us to question our own thoughts and actions, but asks us to leave everyone else for Him to judge. What a burden lifted from my heart!. All I had to do was let go of the running list of how I thought Jesus would NOT like “those” churches, and work on my own actions (maybe even harder than I ever did) to, love the poor, needy, oppressed, disenfranchised as God was calling me to do. Let’s be a louder voice for love, like Jesus, still a rebel for a cause.
    Thank you for being so thought provoking.

    ps (no offense intended) Converse is plural :)

  • Christopher Flinchbaugh

    I have experienced much of what Erin describes in quite a few self-described charismatic churches in the north east as I grew up in that vein of Christianity. In some of those places that production was just a show meant to draw others to the sorts of messages Erin described. While in others the genre of music and artistic expression seemed authentic while the foundational teachings behind it all poisoned the art and sadly reduced it to something unrecognizable as far as Jesus’ teachings go. So there is quite a range even in just me experience of that one expression of Christianity. 

    That said, there are many people in those churches BECAUSE of the loving community found there — even if divorced from their neighborhoods — while at times frustrated with the segregated, anti-intellectual mindsets, strange meshing of politics and theology, and inward focus status of the leadership and therefor the congregation. It’s a tough spot to be in that becomes even tougher if you start to speak up. If you know of people like this, support them any way you can. It can make a big difference in that person’s life and, potentially, that community’s!

  • Pingback: The World Wide (Religious) Web for Wednesday, August 3, 2011 « GeorgePWood.com

  • http://twitter.com/erinvechols Erin Echols

    Here is a bit more explanation about my experiences with the gender essentialism I mentioned in the post. http://erinvechols.com/religion/missfit-a-case-for-a-non-essentialist-view-of-gender-in-the-church

  • Revkathymorris

    As the pastor of a truly integrated liberal church in Downtown Atlanta I appreciate your comments.  We worship in casual attire and have a traditional service.  We have a soup kitchen and shelter for homeless women and children.  We have 50 people on a good Sunday because we are too real, too open, and too demanding of change. 

  • https://compassiondave.wordpress.com Dwells

    Yup, it’s all about you.

  • Bferster

    erin,  a lot of truth in your ranting and often in agreement, check out elevation in charlotte-bf

  • Pingback: weight loss diet

  • Pingback: discounts centre parcs sherwood forest

×

TRENDING: Caught in the Act: Reputation and Relationship >>