Is Postmodern Christianity Dead?

Some people find great pleasure in being the first to claim the death of the latest thing to capture our collective imagination. You can see it everywhere in the worlds of fashion, art and technology, but this jadedness has crept into religion too.

I have heard a handful of people claim that postmodern theology is dead. We’re moving on. That ship has sailed. Next! But to say as much betrays ignorance about what is at the foundation of postmodernism.

Some people mistakenly think that postmodern thought has only been around for the last several years, but in fact, the concept of postmodernism has been around for more than a century, and it has been applied to religion and theology for nearly as long.

Postmodernism is essentially a response to modernism, a more dualistic, absolute, objective way of seeing the world that emerged from the Enlightenment. Whereas a modernist sees most truth as either/or, a postmodernist is more comfortable with the both/and perspective, allowing multiple truths to exist in tension. It recognizes the significance of subjective reality on our understanding of truth, and as such, challenges more rigid doctrines, dogmas or policies that value uniformity of thought over pluralistic coexistence.

It’s not hard to see why this way of thinking, which was originally used in a religious context as a philosophical critique of Catholic teaching and theology, would appeal to many of today’s Christians. Many of us have, ourselves, had negative experiences when our understanding of God butts up against a seemingly immovable doctrine of the Church. The result has been, for this and other reasons, a mass exodus of younger people from organized religion.

Enter what some call the Emerging Church. Though some wrongly label emerging church or theology as nothing more than a trendy new wrapping for the same old thing, it’s actually both a byproduct of, and a reaction to, the world we live in today. We’re more heterogeneous in our cultural experience for the most part, and the world has shrunk down, connecting us all as one global Diaspora.

At the same time, movements such as neo-liberal globalization and neo-conservative nation building have revealed that the dualistic, modern way of thinking and living hardly is a thing of the past itself. While there are powers in our world that would prefer to delineate the planet along us/them, good/evil sorts of dualistic lines, the emerging Christianity seeks to embrace the pluralistic coexistence valued by postmodernism. At the same time, it longs to connect people through more ancient ways of relating, reflecting the monastic, tribal and communal models of society.

This isn’t to suggest that emerging Christianity seeks to deconstruct modern life or separate itself from it, but rather to coexist within it, while also challenging modernist power systems that seek to oppress, dehumanize or marginalize. All of this, if considered in the context of Christ and his ministry, is nothing new.

Will emerging Church fade away, be hybridized by yet another movement or calcify into something much like the things it was meant to resist? Most likely. But to reduce it down to a fad promulgated by a handful of opportunistic faith leaders is to ignore the scope and breadth of postmodernism itself, where emerging Christianity came from.

—-
Christian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He is the creator and editor of BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE and BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS. Christian has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date. Visit www.christianpiatt.com, or find him on Twitter or Facebook.



Print Friendly

About the Author

Christian Piatt

Christian PiattChristian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He co-founded Milagro Christian Church in Pueblo, Colorado with his wife, Rev. Amy Piatt, in 2004.He is the creator and editor of BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE and BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS. Christian has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date. Visit www.christianpiatt.com, or find him on Twitter or Facebook.View all posts by Christian Piatt →

  • http://www.travismamone.net/ Travis Mamone

    I think the main flaw of postmodern Christianity is that most people (yes, I did say most) think postermodern Christianity is just another Christian subculture or denomination, like Calvinism or Neo-Orthodoxy or Evangelical.  From what I understand of postmodern Christianity–and please keep in mind that I am neither a philosopher nor a theologian–is basically “What does it mean to follow Jesus’ teachings in the 2000′s?”  If the Evangelicals and the Mainliners and the Calvinists and the liberals all realized that, maybe we’d actually get some work done.

  • Daphnef3113

    Thank you for your thoughts. Obviously well-researched, well-developed. I enjoyed your “Banned Questions” books! Glad to see you here.

  • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

    Thanks Christian. I am thankful for folks like Brian McLaren who have not only clearly defined what post-modernism is (see “A New Kind of Christian”) but have also helped pave the way for the Emerging Church to deal with the issues effecting the post-modern church, theology, and culture. I hope the Emerging Church sticks around for awhile because I believe the church needs it in order to remain relevant in this post-modern world we currently live in. However, it can just as easily fade into oblivion if it doesn’t act and perhaps lay down a foundation from which to rest upon. Not the institutionalized and dogmatic ways of the modern church, but in a way that will clearly communicate its intended purpose and its foundational beliefs. In the same sense, I also hope and pray that the Evangelical community will drop its boxing gloves and be willing to come to the table with its Emerging brothers and begin a fruitful and productive dialog towards unity. Why? Because it is much needed in order for Christianity to not only thrive, but remain in existence.

  • http://www.emergingmummy.com Sarah@EmergingMummy

    Exactly. Thank you!

  • Jclaytonjohnson

    Some have suggested that the Christians of the early twentieth century tended to make one of two mistakes. Some reacted to modernism by becoming separtist fundamentalists. Others embraced it fully. Is it possible that there are both pros and cons to postmodernism, and that many Christians are presently making one of those  same two mistakes? Might it simply be serving as a transition into a “post-post modern” or global society? (not necessarily referring to ‘globalization’ per se) I see, for example, a problem with the trickle down of the “deconstructionsist” understandings. I’m not convinced that there is much difference between a ‘red neck’ saying “that woman got her position because she is a minority”, and a young kid saying “that woman got that position because we live in a statist capitalistic society!” Of course, “deconstructing deconstructionism” is not to say that certain things do not need to be looked at critically. This is part of the role of independent thinking :)

  • http://thehomespunlife.com Sisterlisa

    Christians should be encouraged and supported while sorting through all sorts of doctrines and teachings. They shouldn’t be made to feel like they can only question as far as what the current ‘pastor popular’ questions. They should be able to move forward with their own soul liberty, embrace their royal priesthood, and go beyond what those popular pastors are willing to go. Many times those pastors have a heap whole lot more to lose than the average congregant. We do not need to rely upon a pastor or pope to put their stamp of approval on our journey. While it’s nice to have community in our journey, chances are we just won’t get it if we go beyond that ‘slippery slope’, but we certainly have the freedom to do so. And for any Christ-like community to drop them like a hot potato for adventuring, then that’s not a real community of support and we’re better off walking on water with Jesus than staying in a ship with people who are still afraid.

  • Pingback: The Royal Priesthood is Growing Up : Soul Liberty Faith

  • Doane

    You are so correct about the embracing perspective and the age of what is now called post-modern. It started at least as early as Kierkegaard, morphed through Martin Buber, Thomas Merton and Paul Tillich and many others.
    It is no more than a more complete view of the world, and that only dies when we stop looking.

    • Jclaytonjohnson

      I agree in so far as I believe we lack something without some foundation and grasp of the Biblical Story. At the same time, I think that some of these figures that you mention served a purpose in responding to modernism, and they also maintained a more solid foundation than what some contemporaries would want to portray. The way that postmodernists tend to respond to modernism, however, is very different. They tend to want to throw the rational baby out along with the rationalist bath water, but reason is still a part of revelation. If everything was strictly perceptive, without logic and reason, that could get a bit depressing eventually.

×

TRENDING: Remember Guantanamo Bay? Day 102 of the Hunger Strike >>