It is Time for the American Christian Church to Surrender the Gay Marriage Fight, Apologize & Share Love

Human Rights Campaign E1348866245793

I need to clarify right out of the gate that this post will not focus on the “choice vs. birth vs. childhood” arguments related to the origin of homosexuality in an individual. We must start from the reality that acknowledges the American Christian church as divided on that issue, and will be for some time. Many on the Right view homosexuality as sin, a growing number on the Left view homosexuality as God-authored and inherently beautiful, and those in the middle have varying views and distinctions to offer. For Christians across the political and denominational spectrum, it is often a struggle to find one’s footing in this complicated issue. After all, the GLBT community includes family members, friends and neighbors.

Instead, this post will focus on making a case from a Christian perspective that gay marriage should be allowed legally in this country, and will attempt to explain why the church will become more like it was intended to be when it concedes this legislative battle. Here’s why.

Are We Warring or Welcoming?

God did not instruct the church to force the rest of the world to have the appearance of the church.

But that is the inevitable objective of the anti-gay marriage movement.

An implication is that a ban on such marriage will cause homosexuality to go stealth and disappear from God’s radar. But even if we’re taking the side of the anti-gay marriage argument and their supporting reasons for a moment, why would God use one singular issue to determine the character of an entire population? Such a finely-tuned fixation not only simplifies God and mankind, but it shows how little the Christian church often chooses to focus on real problems with serious consequences, like unnecessary war, sex trafficking, extreme global poverty, gender inequality, our prison industrial complex, increasing poverty at home, growing income inequality, greed, rampant corruption and an unlawful and unaccountable federal government.

“The sin of your sister Sodom was this: She lived with her daughters in the lap of luxury—proud, gluttonous, and lazy. They ignored the oppressed and the poor. They put on airs and lived obscene lives. And you know what happened: I did away with them.” -Ezekiel 16:49, The Message translation

The quest to deny gay individuals the right to marry in the broader culture is an example of Christian conquest which is and always has been a perversion of discipleship. The church must illuminate a path for seekers to pursue the light of God, and provide a place of solace where the Lord’s call can find a response of the heart. Instead, we have often crowded the path with protesters and picket signs, and drowned out the sound of God’s knocking with our shouting. The mistake of the anti-gay marriage movement in the Christian church is that it is an attempt at indirect discipleship by way of restricting another’s freedom, and discipleship has never succeeded in that way. Discipleship convicts, comforts, and points the way, but it does so established on a foundation of dignity inherent in every person’s God-given right to respond without coercion.

The church ought to be immersed in the business of transforming lives through teaching, compassion and care, instead of treading in the shallow waters that have us trying to govern lives through legislative force. God extends to all of us freewill and patience and it’s time we truly extend both to the GLBT community. And it’s also time we turn the other cheek if we insist on viewing gay marriage as an assault on one’s own values. Having fists raised and holding a posture that is ready to fight are the last gestures that will ever make a group of people feel welcome when they have already been bullied, marginalized, and scorned.

Related: A Possible Compromise on the Gay Marriage Controversy

We wonder, after all of the stadiums filled with people cheering for heterosexual marriage, and the church demonstrations outside of schools during a day of silence for GLBT discrimination, and rallies at the capital, and harsh rhetoric, why people don’t believe us when we as the church say “all are welcome here.” The more vocal anti- gay marriage wing of the church must acknowledge the possibility that it is (at a minimum) sending mixed messages.

Anti-Gay Marriage Arguments are Rooted in What?

I can’t help but groan when anti-gay marriage pastors brag that they’re not homophobic, followed by statements of self-assurance when interviewed by gay reporters such as ”do I look like I’m afraid of you?” Christian pastors need to model themselves after Jesus Christ rather than Robert De Niro in Taxi Driver. Worse, the reasons used to prevent gay marriage are fearful arguments, ranging from fears about gays indoctrinating children to fears about gays taking over the government to fears about losing church rights. We have to ask ourselves if the victory of the cross was achieved through earthly supremacy or through surrender?

Framing the whole debate as a slippery slope is effective if we just want to recruit a bunch of worried people. This happens while some Christians accuse the gay community of doing the exact same kind of recruiting. This should not surprise us, for when we go to war in any form, we inevitably take on traits of the people we’ve branded as enemies. Christians don’t need to see a copy and paste of all the Scriptural passages that talk about a life based in love and not fear because we already know they’re plentiful.

Piety on Parade (the Most Offensive Parade in Town)

When those opposed to gay marriage also claim to be strict adherents to Biblical literalism, they should then be the first ones to destroy the term “sanctity of marriage” because it can be found exactly nowhere in Scripture. Sanctity of marriage is a man-made concoction, used to claim the moral high ground in the same way that organizations use “family” or “freedom” in their title as if they hold a monopoly on virtue.

Christians know that Christ told us to remove the log from our own eyes before we try to take a sliver out of the eyes of another. It is profoundly hypocritical to deny homosexuals the right to marry under the banner of marriage purity when divorce and adultery rates in Christian homes are equal to those in the wider world. Christians have a systemic problem of brokenness and unfaithfulness in our own relational sphere and we’ve preferred at times to answer by pointing the finger at someone else. This is not the way of Jesus.

Moving Towards Humility, Learning to Listen, Daring to be Curious

All of this isn’t to say that the church should give up on wrestling with the complexities of sexual orientation, nor is it to say that the church itself should perform gay marriage ceremonies. Those matters require far more than one blog post. At the very least, and perhaps as a start, we need to surrender the legislative conflict while practicing more humility and recognizing our shared humanity.

Also by Ian: The Danger of Mixing Wealth with America’s “Me” Mentality

What would it mean to the GLBT community to hear from the church in unison “we were wrong to wage this war against you, and we are sorry for it and for all of the ways that we’ve hurt you.” What would it mean to those individuals willing to share that being gay is all that they’ve ever known, if members of the church would respond by wanting to hear more of their story rather than rushing to tell them its the wrong story to have?

The church lacks curiosity because it has fallen for the lie that says rigidity is close to godliness while openness is a form of spiritual weakness. We’re late to our own game. Theology is exploding in local bars, and in lyrics, and in movies and in art and the broader culture, because we have doubled down on an issue that was never ours to begin with, and wasted years in that fruitless space. The church must now recognize that there is no risk to our convictions of faith to enter into authentic dialogue with a genuine sense of curiosity in order to understand the identity and the struggles of another human being, regardless of their sexual orientation.

Here’s the moment when the Christian church will become more relevant, and it’s not when the church wins the culture war. The church will become relevant the moment its members unclench their fists for long enough to host GLBT family members, friends and neighbors for a meal, with nothing expected in return; the moment when true friendship between the church and the GLBT community is no longer contingent on conversion.

If you are a member of the GLBT community and have a story to share, whether you’ve been wounded or uplifted by the church, or something else entirely, please feel free to do so here. Other comments are welcome as always, but if yours is ugly, I’m going to delete it. Please stay respectful, remembering that this is first a human issue, and other humans are reading what you write.

—-
Ian Ebright is a former film critic who now writes about faith, life, culture and human rights. You can read more by visiting his site The Broken Telegraph, or follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

We need your support to sustain our multi-media message, build our platform, and establish connections around the world in an effort to see the Kingdom of God come here on earth as it is in heaven. Please consider donating today:

Donate to RLC

Advertisement


Print Friendly

About the Author

Ian Ebright

Ian EbrightIan Ebright is a former film critic who now writes about faith, life, culture and human rights. You can read more by visiting his site The Broken Telegraph, or follow him on Facebook and Twitter.View all posts by Ian Ebright →

  • Lynne

    I will never understand how Christians focus on certain issues – and don’t focus on Christ. I gave my heart to the Lord close to forty years ago – and I can tell you this. The Bible is clear on one thing – that we are to not just Love the Lord – but to Love the Lord as Ourselves. Sadly, how many Believers do you know that love others like that? I choose to focus on Loving others – and that is working well for me. 

    Get off your butts, people – serve and love – and watch the world around you change – and maybe you will, too!

  • Stephen

    I was raised
    a Christian, and became quite zealous in my teens. Only problem was, around the
    same time I came to understand that I was gay. What a mess! The God I loved
    wasn’t happy with me, and was calling me to let go of something so deeply
    embedded in me, it’d be like removing a vital organ.

    Of course
    all my prayers and attempts to ‘change’ for years were ineffective. Sadly, I
    felt the only choice I had was to leave the church because I knew they wouldn’t
    welcome me, but also at some level because I had been taught to loath this sin
    and so I felt I had to go. So at 20 years old I stop attending church, and came
    out to my parents.

    Obviously coming
    out and leaving God behind wasn’t the answer either. 7 years after leaving the
    church, I had everything (minus God) that should make one happy…great
    job…great partner….great friends.  

    Slowly, I
    came to a breaking point one day.  I said
    to God “I don’t know what’s right or wrong…all I know is that I need
    you”. In that moment I was suddenly convicted about the selfishness of my
    life…not so much being gay, but just doing whatever I wanted without any
    consideration of others or God.

    I took this
    to believe that, God was calling me back, but based on my upbringing I only saw
    one other option available. If I wasn’t going to be ‘healed’ from my gay-ness,
    and I wasn’t going to continue a I had for the last 7 years…I guess celibacy
    was my only avenue.

    So for the
    last 4 years, I’ve been single, pursuing a life of ministry amongst the poor
    and marginalized. Having been marginalized by the church and family myself, I
    could relate to these people, and have a level of empathy for them. The strange
    thing was though…whenever I ran into a GLBT person (even on skid row) my
    faith became awkward. It became this thing I didn’t want to talk about. Did God
    really expect that ever GLBT person was to live alone? Is my life and story
    going to be this wet blanket I throw on GLBT people whenever I share my story?
    Something wasn’t sitting right. Where was the joy? The fruit of the Spirit?
    Rivers of living water?

    So it’s
    taken close to 15 years, but I think God finally got through to me. A few
    months ago a ministry friend I knew from working on the streets invited me to
    attend a GLBT affirming church. I totally was prepared for a flakey…sleazy
    church: cad theology, people hitting on each other…no sense of the presence
    of God.  I’m sure God had a little
    chuckle as he heard those thoughts rattling around in my head.

    I couldn’t
    have been more wrong. As I spend the day at the church, God was presence in
    their midst: in their worship…in the people…in their hearts of love and
    service for the community…in miraculous testimonies…in a ‘sold out for
    Jesus way’ that I never expected to find. How could God be so obviously at work
    in this GLBT affirming church? Should God not bless them for living in sin? Why
    were they the ones so full of joy, and yet I was the one making the big
    sacrifice to serve God, and was often depressed.

    This shook
    my beliefs to my core. Everything church had told me my whole life said that
    what I had just experienced should not be possible. Gays and God do not go
    together. And yet there it was! As I woke up and prayed the next morning, I
    asked God to explain it to me. Without knowing the passage in advance, the
    reference to Acts 10 came to mind.  I
    knew this as God’s voice (the quiet internal one) and so I quickly found the passage
    in my bible.

    It’s the
    story of Peter, having the vision of the sheet being lowered, and then being
    directed to Cornelius’ house. When Peter arrives, he speaks to the gentiles
    there, and they spontaneously begin to speak in tongues. God pours out his spirit
    on the Gentiles, and Peter is surprised.  But rather than say they are unclean, or that
    scripture says they are not allowed in, he realizes that God decides who is in
    and out, and it’s his job to run with that. 10:47 “Surely no one can stand in
    the way of their being baptized with water. They have received the Holy Spirit
    just as we have.”

    It’s taken
    close to half of my life so far to get to this point, but I finally have an
    answer…and it’s not the one I ever expected. Only God has the power to
    reverse our thinking, and set us on the right course. My only prayer is that a
    few more of those leading the charge against GLBT in church, would have these road
    to Damascus moments like I did.

    • http://brokentelegraph.com Ian Ebright

      Stephen- thank you.

      I have a lot to learn about sexual orientation and faith. Your story reminds me of that, and reading it I found myself challenged perhaps in ways similar to how you have been challenged along the journey. We find these clearings where we think we’ve found the answers, and sometimes, God unseats these answers soon after.

      Thank you for finding the site and especially for sharing. I admire you for seeking God as you have and for your ability to challenge yourself and your beliefs. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/stan.cardwell Stan Cardwell

      Stephen, thanks for your sharing your story.  I have a serious question and it relates to Acts 10 (which you cited) and later, the Council of Jerusalem – these are texts that point to the inclusion of Gentiles in what had been a purely Jewish/Samaritan sect.  The key for the church to make this bold leap in identity was the evidence/manifestation of the Holy Spirit.  This was not the fruit of the Spirit you describe but the gifts of the Spirit, specifically glossolalia – speaking in tongues.  The early church had a very tangible signal that God was bringing the Gospel to non-Jews and, guided by where God was already moving, offered inclusiveness.  So I am seeking such a clear sign in this day and age.  Do you know of charismatic homosexual Christians – those who speak in tongues?  I would think that such a clear and tangible sign would signal the church needs to rethink its identity once again.  Scripture cautions us to test the spirits – marks of this test include the tangible presence of God and the unity the Spirit provides (the Spirit will not be speaking two different principles/practices to two polar Christian communities.)  The early church lived in this unity, and were guided explicitly into embracing Gentiles.  I am looking for that explicit call today.

      • http://dailydumpbydave.blogspot.com/ liberaldemdave

        yes there are glbt christians blessed with the gift of tongues. some of them are also left handed.

        i don’t mean to make light of your question…my point is that any attribute a straight person has, gay people also have. we were created out of the same *whole* cloth as our hetero brothers and sisters.

        • Eddie

          there may be something that you still need in order to call me a brother (which, of course I wouldn’t mind, ideally), major repentance and following-up on what Jesus says – be holy as He (God) is holy. You can also read Romans 1:18-26

          • http://dailydumpbydave.blogspot.com/ liberaldemdave

            i repent every day, throughout the day. i’m human. i have been walking this path since i was 10 years old…42 years now.

            what i won’t tell you i’ll do, however, is repent for being gay. there’s nothing to repent *for*. my understanding of the 3 new testament clobber scriptures tells me they are about prostitution, pederasty and idolatry. i agree that those things are sinful. i don’t agree that those passages are about homosexuality.

      • http://www.facebook.com/timgaull Timothy Gaull

        Hey there Stan, I’m not the author. But I’m a whole hearted Christ follower, Baptized in the Holy Spirit without question. I commune with Christ daily as well as participating fully in my faith community were we study scripture digginging into the word lifting each other up and encouraging each other as we push further into the knowledge of his abiding love at the same time we take that fantastic knowledge to those who are nominally or non-religious and we share with them the Good news. My allegiance is absolutely, wholly devoted to that of Christ. Oh, and I happen to be gay. I don’t know if that’s the evidence that you’re referencing here in your commentary but I do know that I love the Lord God with all my heart, soul and mind, and I strive to love my neighbor like that.

        I do hope that you’re able to meet people like me in person. It may go a long way to fostering unity in the church.

        Best Brother!

        • Eddie

          What you say has a triumphalism at its core and I kind of disliked it from the beginning. But lo, you left it at the end – “and I happen to be gay.” Well, let me tell you ‘friend’ you are none of what you stated at first whole hearted CHristian, baptized in the HOly Spirit….I won’t repeat that ’cause only re-writing that torments my soul. I tell what you are – you are totally a deluded, person, if you dare write Holy Spirit and think you have Him in you….. and He continues to encourage you to be gay!!!! You are in a major confusion. I don’t know which BIble you are reading or studying….And please understand one thing, I am not in the business of pointing my finger at you or anybody else (for I am as sinner as anybody else) but the difference is that I repent for my sin, whereas you rejoice and indulge in it. If you love God, leave sin immediately. Then you can make abstraction of the type of sin and say whatever you love and is above God is wrong. It is obvious that even if you say you love God, you love gay-ness more (=sin), so how do you have the Holy Spirit in you???? Don’t try at least to delude others. The least you can do is keep it for you. You desperately need repentance, that is my advice. 2 Tim 3 is very actual in this debate.

          But now, ok, let me ask you something and PLEASE give me your opinion on this.

          What would you say if I were a sado-masochist? Is that wrong? What do you think?

          And I really mean it – I want to know your reply on that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/timgaull Timothy Gaull

        Also to just encourage you. The Holy Spirit is moving in transformative ways today just as he always has. Else I, or half of my friends, wouldn’t be able to experience his transformative grace and peace in our lives.

        • Eddie

          Well, obviously in your case He hasn’t worked in transformative ways. I am glad you brought it. Because you think you don’t need to be transformed, don’t you?

    • Joywhyatt

      Wow, thank you for sharing.  So full of truth and raw emotion!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/mavis.duncanson Mavis Duncanson

      Thank you so much for sharing your story which moved me a lot. I am so pleased that you have found a faith community that “feels like home” to you

    • Jim

      I agree that “coming out and leaving the church” isn’t the answer. But “embracing homosexuality and going to church” isn’t the BIBLICAL answer either. Repentence, conversion through Faith in Christ, and a commitment to a life of Righteousness is the Biblical answer. The Bible says that we have ALL sinned and come short of the Glory of God. But no matter what our sin is, we’re never taught in scripture to embrace it. We’re warned that it’ll drag us to Hell and that we should forsake sin and self for Christ. The Bible teaches that every human being since Adam & Eve, were born with a sinful nature that we inherited from them. Everybody’s tempted with sin of some kind… but nowhere in the Bible does that make sin acceptable or ok. It just simply points out that we’re all sinners who need to be saved from sin… not continue in sin.

      • http://www.facebook.com/TheFlamingGayProphet Gay Prophet

        Loved reading your testimony

    • disqus_tngeWIVx3H

      Dear Stephen,
      Given that you posted your comment a year ago, I don’t don’t know if you will even see this, but I have to leave a comment. First, thank you for sharing your story. It touched my soul and reassures me that my own spiritual journey is truly God-directed, as is yours. When my dear son came out, I was filled with fear for him…for his physical well-being but also for his spiritual health. Today, I am so very grateful that his presence in my life spurred me to look more carefully and to pray about it with sincere desire to know God’s truth. As a result, my heart has opened to the LGBT community and I have had the joy of confidently sharing God’s love with individuals He has put in my path. God loves all of His children.

      Bless you, Stephen. Your light shines bright.
      Claire

    • Eddie

      I honestly admire your sincerity in the matter, but I still think you have a long way to go until you reach a Biblical perspective (or God’s point of view). I am not a judge, because I need to much time to judge myself and too many things there that need to be changed, but I would say what counts is God’s input. I will make a few comments, if you don’t mind as a servant of God for over 20 years now. First of all, you cannot be born a gay person. That is an idea accredited by the so-called psychologists paid by some institutions (for GLBT has a fantastic lobby all over the world) to say so. Their lie has surfaced already. So I would consider it a lie from the enemy. Otherwise it would be a contradiction. How can God condemn something that you are born with – it would be irrational.

      Secondly, I don’t think that God wants every individual (gay or not gay) to be a celibate. This is only for those who can cope with it. You never mentioned a normal relationship with a woman. It is quite easy to understand why has God created male and female, isn’t it.

      Now you are talking about your experience in that gay church (I have never been to one and I would only accept to preach there if they would commit to hear out the truth of the Gospel). Well, I cannot opine on your experience (though I doubt very much what you say about them), for I haven’t been there. A man can be joyful for many reasons- there is a church in Korea and Japan I think Soka Gakai – that worship money, they are very joyful – this does not come from the Lord, though. Ok. now let’s come to your scripture that the Lord provided as answer to your doubts (that were absolutely legitimate). After reading your experience I can say in one word my opinion – confusion. But coming to Acts 10 and Cornelius – my goodness – that has nothing to do with the gay pride. Sorry! Let us consult whatever Bible scholar you propose on this. This is a passage that constitutes the foundation of what we now call in today’s missiology, contextualization. This passage comes here with a purpose. Paul was going to expound on the need for contextualization in the council meeting in Acts 15. But, the only problem was that Paul, at that time was not very influential. The Lord wanted the Gentiles in His flock at least since Abraham. So, because Paul had no support (apart from Barnabas), God prepared a key witness that everyone should have listened to, Peter. He was assigned leadership of the group of 11 at the end of John’s Gospel, which was the core-group of the apostles. So, Jesus wanted to destroy the prejudice against Gentiles, for He wanted them into the Kingdom. Coming to our subject, He also wants the gay into His Kingdom – but not as gay, but as normal, transformed people as He had created men in the beginning.
      What I see here in the whole discussion is a real politics of supporting GLBT. I tell you – you will not help them in this way. You will not help endorsing their sin. We love them as people, but we will never endorse their sin, which is what God does as well. How do I know? Well, even before being a Christian I had something that beeped, like a red light saying – wrong!! That was my conscience. One thing that comes when you are a born again Christian is conscience. Conscience will tell you.

  • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

    Give up the fight? Yes. Apologize? Perhaps. No use in fighting. Everyone
    regardless of gender, sexual identity, beliefs, etc. should always be
    welcomed and invited into the church. But, everyone must leave their
    life of sin and be held accountable to his/her actions and behavior just
    like all of us should. No special provisions. And, there certainly
    should be grace involved. Jesus and Paul set forth certain standards of
    living for a reason. And, although many of us fall short, doesn’t mean
    we give them up altogether.

    • Lynne

      Would you say that ‘not taking care of widows and orphans’ is sin?

      • Lynne

        I just feel like Christians are so quick to judge people on morality issues – but that posses the question that I often think about – “I want to ask God why he allows so much pain and suffering in the world – but I am afraid He will ask me the same question” – as long as their are hungry and hurting people in the world I think we are all sinners (saved by Grace) - 

        • Lynne

          Is disobedience sin?

          • Lynne

            Is disobedience sin? Is it?

          • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

            No. Disobedience is a result of sin.

        • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

          Judging and encouraging one another are two different things. Sadly, a lot of judging has happened, especially when dealing with homosexuality. We shouldn’t judge our brothers in Christ who may struggle with homosexuality. But, we are called to encourage one another and lift one another up, especially when they may be dealing with sin, temptations, trials, and struggles. Just as I would hope someone to do the same for me.

        • Keith Carr61

          Completely off point….These posts keep clouding the issue of whether or not the church should affirm blatant sin and ignore it just to satisfy a few individuals….The Bible says no…end of story

      • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

        Lynne – Good question. I would classify not caring for widows, orphans, and the poor as being disobedient. We are ALL called to to do these things, but sadly we seem to fail.

    • Keith Carr61

      Greg, the ‘fight’ is being brought by the Gay and Lesbian community…not the church. If preaching against sin bothers some on this site then maybe they should consider changing to another faith. I know of NO church that sets out to villanize the homosexual community but I do know individuals who stand up agaisnt the teachings of gay lifestyles as an alternative to our children in our schools. MY RIGHT TO VOTE AND VOICE MY OPINION AGAINST THAT LIFESTYLE THAT IS ‘CHOSEN’ JUST AS ANY OTHER SIN IS CHOSEN. Your last point is of certain fortelling. If the church can not and will not preach against sin then what good is it?? If you cant call it sin then what do you call it? A breach of conduct? I will not fold to this type of pagan thought and teaching. This author will be held accountable for this heiracy.

      • Benmanben

        I really don’t understand some of what Greg is saying regarding disobedience resulting from sin. What does that even mean? Isn’t sin “transgression of the law”?
        Sometimes I think people on here just want to find the most pleasant thing to say, instead of the best.

  • Pingback: Red Letter Christians » It is Time for the American Christian Church … | My Blog

  • Jennifer A. Nolan

    Wow!  This is a good piece of moral argument!  If anyone wants to read more, not only should they read  The Broken Telegraph, but also soulforce.org.

  • Alastair Shaw

    Some brief responses from a British Christian:

    1. The American Christian tendency to “war” is a problem broader than the issue of gay marriage. It is deeply rooted in the nation and its churches’ history and culture.

    2. In a democracy, participation in law-making is an activity open to all. It would be surprising, therefore, for those who understand marriage to be, by definition, a heterosexual institution, to not express this view when laws are being framed or amended.

    3. Your statement that “God did not instruct the church to force the rest of the world to have the appearance of the church” is a truism. But your analysis of the church’s role as “transforming lives”, while sounding appealing at a pastoral level, is perhaps rather too individualistic to do justice to our role as “salt” in society, nor to the corporate and structual dimensions to sin in the world.

    4. Is your approach to enagement with the gay rights agenda applied in the same way to the other issues you refer to as legitimate areas of Christian concern? “Growing income inequality, greed, rampant corruption and an unlawful and unaccountable federal government” will never be effectively challenged by only offering individual pastoral teaching or by being welcoming. In fact, have you never raised a voice or held a picket in protest at any of these issues?

    • steven rozzi

      I think you bring up some really good points here. 

      1. The American tendency to war in the government as well as in the church seems to be a very big problem (coming from an American). I’m really tired of a solely two-sided “battle” on everything from politics to the evangelical church to ice cream.

      2. I totally agree that democratic participation should be open to all. But, I’m not sure where the definition of marriage is defined as heterosexual outside of national/state laws.

      3. Agreeing with you, I think it’s really disheartening to see people (most often, those in the church) look for answers to problems in such an individualistic manner. And as someone who studies sociology, there really needs to be more attention paid to structural causes of problems we see today. With that said, I’m not sure Ebright is giving us here a too individualistic answer – if the church, as an institution, were to embrace gays, I think he’s saying, that in turn would transform lives and society as a whole. 

      4. Here’s where I came upon the real conundrum. I usually place myself in agreement with this article – I think the most Christ-like thing to do would be to allow gay marriage, giving gays equal rights under the law and thereby valuing gays and showing them love. But, the interesting point you bring up here is that those in opposition to gay marriage are effectively constraining gays to do something they would want to do, which would be the same as constraining CEOs, congresspeople, etc. from doing what they want to do (make the most profit possible/get reelected by means of oppression – further explanation on this would require another post…). I would also usually put myself in agreement with that stance as well though (putting more government regulation on corporations, etc). So, you bring up the question – how can we support constraining one group of people while supporting not constraining another? I would say that it seems more loving to allow someone who is gay to get married and therefore show that you value that person than to allow someone motivated by profit (which is probably created by the nature of capitalism itself [so, i'm not saying business owners and politicians are bad people] – again, another post to explain that one…) to oppress people into poverty which constrains them from attaining any better/more human living conditions by their own doing. Though, this argument/justification still seems a problem to me which remains to be thought through more thoroughly. Many thanks for the food for thought though!

    • http://brokentelegraph.com Ian E

      Alastair- thank you for the comment.

      The American Christian tendency to “war” is a problem far broader! You would really like my other posts. I hope you’ll visit my blog. ‘The Horrific Abuses of the War on Terror, and Why the American Christian Church Doesn’t Care’ will get you started.

      My statement (in your number 3) SHOULD be self-evident in the US, but it’s not. That’s part of the problem, revealing how warped the church is when it comes to understanding its proper role in engaging the wider world. You’d be surprised how many people have been plugging this post using that very quote. That just goes to show that for many, it is actually clarifying, and that is part of the problem. It SHOULD be obvious.

      I raise my voice in protest all the time- against injustices (like those listed in the post) things which cause harm, violence, innocence to be lost, and theft to occur, as examples. I speak out against acts of aggression. One can hardly make the argument that a legal contract between two willing adults is in the same category as other acts of violence whether outright via war, or sexual via trafficking, or economic via poverty or other inequality (such as the gap in wages along gender lines). Equating the two is quite insulting to homosexuals, in my view.

  • Benmanben

    Firstly, I don’t believe it is sinful to “be a homosexual”. I believe that homosexuality is sinful.
    I do not hate homosexuals or others for being sexually immoral.
    Whether or not a person is born attracted to homosexuality hardly matters, as we are all born into sin. Everyone is tempted to something bad. I believe that when most people say “homosexual”, they mean someone who is attracted to the same-sex, and I suppose it is very possible that that cannot be much changed. I think MANY of us CAN change how we ACT.

    I do NOT find homosexual activity to be any worse a sin than the other forms of sexual morality, the reason I mention it here is because it was discussed in the article.
    I feel much the same way about pre-marital sex.

    As to the “sanctity of marriage…”
    I do not care very much about the U.S. Government’s stance on marriage,
    or how it protects it. The government is simply the government.
    Politics are politics. I am not interested in pursuing a strict legal definition of marriage for man’s own government, particularly in a free country.

    HOWEVER, I do think that Marriage was instituted by God, as shown in Genesis and throughout the bible. I believe it is described as becoming “One Flesh.”

    It seems that some people are suggesting that because the Bible mentions all sorts of sexually immoral relationships, it endorses all of them. But it does not only mention things which it endorses, so I’m not sure why this is so often brought up.

    I can be OK with Homosexual Marriage being allowed by a man-made government,
    but I don’t agree with it. It doesn’t mean I hate people who do it or are attracted to others of the same-sex.   
    Surely some of you disagree with what I’m saying here, but do not hate me.
    I’m not shoving it into someone’s face against their will.
    I’m simply saying what I believe.

    The Church is NOT the U.S. Government, and I think it should attempt to institute some actions regarding sexual immorality.
    I believe there is a difference between someone who is born/becomes attracted to the same-sex, and someone who does what they wish with that attraction. Has any Church actually banned homosexuals from preaching who are NOT practicing homosexual activity?
    Surely that much is a choice. 
    I may be attracted to do many things, but I do not do them all.

    I am of course against the bullying of those who are homosexual, and even those who engage in homosexual activity.
    I may find homosexual activity to be a sin, but I do not hate homosexuals. I also do NOT hate homosexuals who practice homosexual activity.

    I just believe homosexual activity to be wrong, just like many of the activities that I am attracted to, and sometimes do. I can only live by the grace of God.

    I should NOT JUDGE people, but I can still disagree with certain actions.
    I should NOT hate so-and-so for doing something immoral, but I can still think that some things are immoral.

    • Dane

      Very balanced comment. I would love to talk with you more and get your opinion on some questions/issues. I absolutely applaud you for this post, it was filled with love, thank you. 

      • Keith Carr61

        Amazing how we have become so tuned in to “love” and only if the person treats it with kit gloves is he/she considered to ‘show love’ What about “tough love?” Sometimes the situation calls for tougher stances and frankly…spinal insertion. I agree that “tact” should be used but dont equate a post that is riding the fence as “loving” Im not picking on Ben’s post however your comment was one that I see alot on here and seems to me that if showing love doesnt allow you to stand by your beliefs then whats the point?

        • Keith Carr61

          Again, Ben I agree with much of your post however I dont believe you can say that someone is not sinning if they participate in something you say is a sin.

        • Keith Carr61

          Again, Ben I agree with much of your post however I dont believe you can say that someone is not sinning if they participate in something you say is a sin.

        • JB

          Amen!!!!

      • Keith Carr61

        Amazing how we have become so tuned in to “love” and only if the person treats it with kit gloves is he/she considered to ‘show love’ What about “tough love?” Sometimes the situation calls for tougher stances and frankly…spinal insertion. I agree that “tact” should be used but dont equate a post that is riding the fence as “loving” Im not picking on Ben’s post however your comment was one that I see alot on here and seems to me that if showing love doesnt allow you to stand by your beliefs then whats the point?

    • Benmanben

      Now, I think I have made clear that I am MORALLY opposed to homosexual ACTS.
      I do not hate homosexuals.
      I should also probably clarify;
      I am NOT saying that the people who ARE interested in a legal definition of marriage between a man-woman hate homosexuals. I think they just see the moral line of government being drawn a little further. I do not think they hate homosexuals. 
      I think that they too are loving the sinner, just hating the sin.

      I hope that all came through, because I think my views on all of this may seem different, but please understand these are different issues;

      1.) I believe homosexual actions are immoral, but do not hate homosexuals.

      2.)I believe that the law does NOT NEED to institute these actions.
         However, this does not mean I don’t sympathize with people who DO think there needs to be a law regarding it. I think that like me they share a dislike of the ACT, not of the PERSON.(Though some we see in the news may hate both.)

      All in all, I can love the sinner but hate the sin.

      • Psalm63:7

        I do disagree that we don’t need to be concerned about what the law says.  It affects us all in too many ways.  However, I do see your point.

        • Anonymous

           Yeah… the law of this nation does not supercede the guidance of Christ’s Word. So while the nation OKs civil unions between whomever, the guidance us Christians follow never changes. So it doesn’t matter what our government OKs or not…our Bible stays the same. So fighting it is futile.

          Besides, the Bible says that the world would go in this direction leading up to Christ’s return anyhow. I can’t imagine why any Christian would want to try to postpone that. Let the world be the world. It’s our job to be light in this world, not FORCE the world to ACT like us…but INVITE the world to accept Christ’s love and follow Him. We’re just not doing a good job of that in this country and especially regarding this LGBT issue.

      • JB

        Excellent post. My thots exactly.

    • Psalm63:7

      Your post is excellent.  One of my real frustrations is that it is NOT ok anymore to say that homosexual acts are wrong.  I can say that other things listed as sin in the Bible are wrong and no one thinks I hate anyone who does them.  Why aren’t homosexual acts put on the same scale?  It is because culture now states we are not to consider it as sin.  Sadly, the church is jumping on board that train.  
      We are called to love the sinner.  If a homosexual joins my church I will give them the same love and serving that everyone should have.  I won’t stroll up to them and tell them they are going to hell.  If asked by them, I will say it is clearly listed as sinful in the Bible and anyone who desires it needs help and prayer just as much as the folks struggling with gossiping or the lying needs the same.  And hopefully by loving them and showing that they are important to me and even more important to God will eventually earn me the right to speak frankly with them.

    • Anonymous

       I agree with your stance 110%. WELL said.
      I’ve told a few people that although I disagree with homosexual marriage from a Biblical standpoint, don’t expect me to join protests and demonstrations against it. Just like this article said, Christ didn’t go around protesting sinners. He went around eating with them and inviting them to follow Him…showing them His love.

    • Richard

      Great post. The thing that people seem to miss is that sin keeps us from God, regardless of the sin. If we affirm any sin as OK, then there is a chance that our position may keep others from God by affirmation.

      I am not saying that Jesus cannot save certain people, because He can save anyone, but if sin is allowed to remain in our lives (whatever that sin might be), then we accepting less than God’s best.

      We didn’t declare homosexual behaviour or any other sin to be sinful, but God did. Can we change that because we feel like it? No. Does homosexual marriage change it? No.

      What should Christians do?
      Be willing to be used by God, in whatever way He sees fit for us. Reach out to everyone with compassion. Try to help other get closer to God.

  • Jason

    Being in the LGBT community for 6 years, having boyfriends, and communing with that culture showed me that the LGBT community is in need of God. They are in pain. I was in pain. We need Jesus. 

    Christians cannot forget that the LGBT are hurting people in need of God’s love.

    • Keith Carr61

      Jason, It sounds like you have repented and left the gay life. Is this correct?

    • Anonymous

       My God, yes. I just wish people would stop treat homosexuality like a paramount, ‘trump card’ sin. Show this community that Christ loves them just as they are.

    • Joel

      I think there is a righteous way to be a homosexual and an unrighteous way to be a homosexual. The greek words in the N.T. are arsenokoitai and malakoi, arsenokoitai literally mean “man-beds.” It only show up twice in the new testament (compared with murder, adultery, and theft which show up each about 50 times), and therefore I think it is a cultural word. I take that stance, because malakoi is linked with arsenokoitai, and malakoi literally mean “child prostitute.” I think that these words are referring to the treatment of married men sleeping with boys, and vice versa for women. When need to have more talks and moratoriums over this issues, and not just say, “Yeah, it’s sin, but you don’t have to act on it,” or “love the sinner, hate the sin.” Last time I checked marriage was made for man, and not man for marriage. Let’s use marriage to provide a loving, committed relationship for all love partnerships.

      • Eddie

        Read Rom 1:18-27 and if you want we can make a little Bible study to see what God says about it and what is His opinion, because we cannot just judge one another.

  • Anonymous

    God did not instruct the church to force the rest of the world to have the appearance of the church.

    I’m inclined to agree that the church shouldn’t bother with how the government defines marriage.  I’m wondering whether Ian thinks the above admonition should be applied to public policy issues other than the gay marriage fight…

  • Chw777

    I understand the points made. I just disagree. I dont want to live in a society where men marry men and women marry women and have public displays of affection. Heterosexual public displays of affection are bad enough.  And I would not want children to grow up believing that gay marriage is a viable option.
     

    • Carrie M

      I don’t think this is an issue of what “I” want. There are many things going on in my society that I don’t like. Personally, I don’t like seeing women wearing velour track suits, and it really irks me that yachts get tax breaks as second homes, but these issues aren’t in the news. 
      As for PDA’s… they’ll continue no matter what the law is. They’re in the news, they’re in magazines, they’re on our computers, and the more we fight over it, the more “in your face” they’ll be.

      • Benmanben

        I think Homosexuality is covered in the Bible.

      • Benmanben

        I agree that perhaps seeking a legal solution to this particular issue is not the best way of solving it. I think it is just causing people to get angry and do essentially the same things anyways.

      • Benmanben

        I agree that perhaps seeking a legal solution to this particular issue is not the best way of solving it. I think it is just causing people to get angry and do essentially the same things anyways.

  • Holldoug

    Yeah lets give up the fight on any moral issues. Maybe  the world will like us then.

    ‘Righteousness exalts a nation’…Now if America wants to abandon righteousness to honor and recognize what the Bible describes as an abomination then cheer on. As Christians we have to take a stand on what God has said. It is not a popularity contest. Ian’s article would have received a resounding cheer in the market square of Sodom.

    Well it seems commentators are right about one thing, nowadays the most respected virtue is ‘tolerance’ not Godliness.

    Anyone see an Iceberg ahead?

    • Keith Carr61

      I see the Iceberg brother and as I read the author’s article I felt a chill come over me as I see the work of satan dressed up in his sunday best to cloud believers minds. I am not trying to be funny…I see this as a very serious attempt to undermine my faith and I abhor it.

    • Anonymous

      It’s not about succumbing to unrighteousness. What it’s about is for Christians to quit trying to make the world to stop being the ‘world’ without Christ’s love. You’re absolutely right about upholding moral values and Biblical integrity….but for who? How can we expect NON-believers to embrace the Word of God BEFORE they embrace Christ? How can they embrace Christ if all we’re doing is telling them “god hates f*gs”, kicking them out of our congregations (while letting adulterers sit on the front row), and overall making them feel unwelcome in our midst? Is that what Christ did? No. He sat with unbelievers. He ate with unbelievers. He fed unbelievers. He didn’t hold picket signs out front of Ceasar’s gates. He didn’t lead demonstrations against tax collectors. He saved prostitutes and adulterous women. He didn’t even kick Pharisees out of the church when they came. He healed people. He fed people. He answered people’s questions about faith and religion. He did everything that we’re FAILING to do ‘in the name of God’.
      Think about it… let’s say that we ‘won’ this so-called battle against gay marriage. What then? Would the LGBT community suddenly realize ‘hey, we were wrong. I guess we ought to stop being gay now and go to church”. No. They, the individuals themselves, would feel defeated – and defeated by whom? the CHURCH! US! It would only create a wider chasm between the LGBT community and Christ because WE represent Christ. And if we continually place ourselves in a position against the individuals, constantly HIGHLIGHTING their sins and never sharing Christ’s love, we effectively keep them from knowing Christ as we’ve only shown them how Christ doesn’t love them by our divisive over-zealous actions.
      To participate in homosexual acts is a sin. But so is partiality. So is hypocrisy. So is effectively repeling someone from knowing Christ. This isn’t about saying “OK, you can lead a homosexual lifestyle if you come to church.” It’s about opening our fists and sharing Christ’s love to people who just have sin in their lives just like we do.

  • Dr. J. D. Abbott, Jr.

    1. Nothing ever disappears from God’s radar!
    2. To do as you suggest forces us to deny the authority of Scripture.
    3. We don’t have to approve of a homosexual life style to love people who are homosexual.
    4. It is not necessary for us to rewrite the scripture just so someone can feel accepted.
    5. I, personally refuse to give up my faith in God, my salvation through Jesus Christ, and the authority of God’s holy Word for any group that basically says “in your face” to God.

  • Anonymous

    You claim “God did not instruct the church to force the rest of the world to have the appearance of the church”.  But as a Catholic, that’s EXACTLY what my church attempted, until the Protestant Rebellion ruined Christendom (possibly forever).  In fact, modeling general society after the Church is the only thing that rescued Europe from the dark ages and allowed civilization itself to survive the fall of Rome.

    However, having said that- I see it as a model for gay marriage.  Let secular society degrade into ruin- give us our monasteries and Cathedrals and we will survive.  And long after homosexuals and liberals discover that a lifestyle based on anti-life practices of homosexual sex and abortion and contraception will lead to a demographic collapse, we’ll still be here.

  • Jim

    Thank you for this article.  Even through our trashing of circumstances and people, so how God has not left the room.  He is there and alive.  We can make our lives so hard for ourselves and others.  The following verse out of 1 Cor seems to be very fitting with all of social ills.  Let me start by saying a couple things.  First, generally we operate in the power of the flesh.  Even in “noble” pursuits.  Second, we really do not believe God.  That is the same as the first.  
    T
    When we do not understand the defining line of the age of grace, and still live under the law, then our response to social happenings suck.  

    We have all heard the example of the speed limit sign.  The sign is the law and says drive 40mph, but we like to go 45mph.  Why is that you might ask.  It is answered in the verse below.

    The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

    So if your not hip on homosexuality, just tell someone that God will judge them for being a homo.  What naturally happens, according to the bible is that someone delves deeper…..no matter what the subject.

    May the body of Christ, all of us, come to the cross daily, hourly, every moment.  What a gift we have been given.

    If you want to see change, tell of the love of Jesus, and His forgiveness.  As one of my former Buddhists friends from Nepal has simply said, “Jim, when I started to read the bible, I found what was missing in my life”.

    Jim

    • Keith Carr61

      Once again…No one is jumping in the face of homosexuals and telling them they are going to hell. The fight is being brought by the gay community to be affirmed. How many times do we have to say it??????  Tell you guys what….lets have a group of swingers organize and ask the church to affrim that activity. If they werent trying to teach this crap in school to OUR kids and asking the churches oerlook sin then I dont care if they get couples rights, insurance, etc… it makes no difference to me…but what does make a difference is to get out of my face unless you want your feelings hurt. We can dialogue about what the Bible says about it but Im not going to pat you on tthe back while trying to witness to you.

  • Carrie M

    Thank you, This article is refreshing for me. I’ve struggled with the issue and come to the same conclusion as you. I thought I was the only one.

    • Keith Carr61

      Here is a perfect example of a soul you have led astray. You have affirmed their sin and for so doing you will be held accountable Ian.

      • JennyM

        Dang, Keith, just go away.  Why are you even on a site called Red Letter Christians??  You won’t find any red letters stating anything about gay marriage or homosexuality.  Just chill out and let grown ups make their own decisions for themselves, based on their own relationship with God.

  • Valerie

    I weep for the people that have been hurt by the church… I pray continually for the Love of Christ to be more important than any moral law the church would like to impose on the greater community. We need to address all sin equally, with the same amount of mercy and grace offered to all.

  • Red

    I agree with much in this article, but I do want to make one point.

    There are many Christians who don’t want gay marriage legalized, not because they think a ban will make gays go AWAY, but because they feel that legalizing gay marriage would be the same as ENDORSING it.

    Wherever you stand on the issue of gay marriage, it is a reality that the legalization of it would make it more “normalized” in society, and the next generation of kids will indeed pick up on that. The gay community and the church both know this.

    So this is where it gets tricky. It’s very true that the church is never called to make the rest of the world have the appearance of church morality. But at the same time, others would argue that we ARE to speak up when we feel that culture is endorsing something which is ultimately not good for humanity.

    Honestly, I don’t fear the idea of gay marriage being legalized. I’m not arguing that everyone should pick up protest signs. What I am saying is, don’t misrepresent the conservative side of the argument. For some it is about bigotry and wanting to forcibly stop the gay community. But for others, it’s a question of whether the church should shrug and say “Yeah, fine, whatever” when really there is a moral issue at stake.

    • http://brokentelegraph.com Ian E

      Hi Red.

      As I shared with Tim above, I grew up in conservative circles and was one myself until about five years ago. I don’t think I’m misrepresenting their side at all, it’s just that I only have so many words before the post becomes War and Peace in length, so I have to pick my topics carefully.

      I understand your concern. There are countless examples of things which are legal yet things which the church, or much of the church, argues is immoral and sinful, so using that argument to enforce a legislative ban on gay marriage is quite absurd. We have strip clubs, casinos, smoking, tattoo parlors, you name it, all of which parents have learned how to navigate with their children, even while many of those parents feel they could make a Biblical argument against those things. I can find you Christians who think alcohol consumption is sin, are we then to legislate a ban on selling beer?

      The conservative wing of the church makes the mistake of trying to control the culture as a way to honor God while the progressive wing of the church often mirrors the culture too closely. Both extremes have the potential to miss the transformative power of the Gospel, God’s spirit, and the game changer that is Christ resurrected, by playing games in response to the culture instead of first being transformed by God and then just going to serve and bless the culture.

      And, to affirm your point that the church has a role to play in advocating purity,etc in the broader culture, I agree with you, and that is much of the point of the post. HOW we advocate purity really matters (I’ve offered clues in the post) and that advocacy should never come at the expense of compassion, love, dignity or liberty for another.

      Good comment, Red.

      • Bob

        “The conservative wing of the church makes the mistake of trying to control the culture as a way to honor God…” This is exactly the point that Alastair Shaw noted above. The progressive wing of the church does the same thing when they demand legal endorsement of financial equality through taxation, wealth redistribution, and immigration reform. Yet, when it comes to homosexual marriage, you mistakenly see yourselves as the ones allowing people to live freely and hope that through discipleship they will change culture. Newsflash, this is the only issue that the progressive church does not see the government as a solution to a morality problem. The conservative church does not reject homosexual marriage for so simple a reason as to ‘prevent gays from being gay with each other’. There are a host of justice issues that follow from gay marriage, and as citizens of this government we have a role to play to uphold justice, especially if the cause of injustice is a fundamentally flawed view of human nature. In short, this article is at best naive, and at worst a gross deception. The history of the church is filled with men and women who justly sought civil and spiritual goods; some through actual wars, not just legal ones.

  • Jim

    I am not a global expert, or world religion expert by any means.  But I think it is worthwhile to point out that in the major world religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, sexual conduct is a big deal.

    Religions, including Christianity, have overlapping shadows of similarity, yet with their own uniqueness.

    Trust me, I am not saying “all paths lead to heaven”.  I am simply stating there are commonalities.

    Chances are the reader of this blog lives in the USA, and has primarily been shaped by Christian thought from the west.

    Changing directions just for a moment, for some reason God has called out homosexual behavior as sin.  Just like he has any other aspect of unbelief.

    Recently, I was in Kathmandu, and the local paper reported on a story where homosexual activists were seeking equal rights.

    Remember, Nepal is a country that is about 92% Hindu and maybe 5% Buddhist.  

    I would not be at all surprised that there will continue to be a change on the major religions front in many arenas, including equal rights for sexual orientation.

    The point of my note here is that the issue at hand is not unique to Christians or the USA.  The USA might be on the forefront, but other countries will soon be involved in standing up for equal rights for homosexuals, men, women, children, immigrants, etc.

    Just a couple of thoughts.

  • Jim

    I am not a global expert, or world religion expert by any means.  But I think it is worthwhile to point out that in the major world religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, sexual conduct is a big deal.

    Religions, including Christianity, have overlapping shadows of similarity, yet with their own uniqueness.

    Trust me, I am not saying “all paths lead to heaven”.  I am simply stating there are commonalities.

    Chances are the reader of this blog lives in the USA, and has primarily been shaped by Christian thought from the west.

    Changing directions just for a moment, for some reason God has called out homosexual behavior as sin.  Just like he has any other aspect of unbelief.

    Recently, I was in Kathmandu, and the local paper reported on a story where homosexual activists were seeking equal rights.

    Remember, Nepal is a country that is about 92% Hindu and maybe 5% Buddhist.  

    I would not be at all surprised that there will continue to be a change on the major religions front in many arenas, including equal rights for sexual orientation.

    The point of my note here is that the issue at hand is not unique to Christians or the USA.  The USA might be on the forefront, but other countries will soon be involved in standing up for equal rights for homosexuals, men, women, children, immigrants, etc.

    Just a couple of thoughts.

  • Kris

    I attended a local UMC – My partner worked weekends, so she didn’t attend with me – I read the banner on the curb “open hearts. open minds. open doors.” and believed it – It should have also read “closed closets” … I became involved – joined a women’s small group book study – made an appointment to meet with the pastor about baptizing our boys – an infant son & an older child whom we had just adopted – the pastor told us that he would not baptize our boys, as we could not adhere to the covenant to raise them in faith, as we were living in sin – the same day, i received a call from the leader of my small group telling me i was not welcome to return, as the fact that i was gay, was making some of the other moms uncomfortable & they were unwilling to have me bringing my sin into their time of fellowship and learning … i can not articulate the depth of the hurt and betrayal …

    • l.nicole.g

      Thank you for sharing your story. I pray you and your family will be lead to a church body that can love and support you, just as you are, to witness to the Love of Christ, and to help you find healing and trust beyond the pain and betrayal that another church as caused. I hope you find someplace to affirms that first and foremost you are a Beloved of God; you are loved, you and your partner are loved, you and your children are loved.

  • George

    Well written.. in total agreement with all  said here.. why do we so strain at the Gnats??

    Why would a GLBT person want to be with a group of ppl that makes them feel less..

    • Keith Carr61

      Maybe its because the author is trying to get us to swallow a camel

  • Tim

    After reading your well written article the second time I calmed down a bit, but I still believe that you have misrepresented those, thinking and compassionate Christians who  oppose the legalization of gay marriage.  I also thnk that some of your arguements have glaing flaws, but I, at the moment, don’t have time to expand on those logic “mis-fires.”

    While there has unfortuately been much wrong done, in the name of Christ, with respect to interacting with, and responding to the needs of, homosexuals, to attempt to deny what God has established as the intended relationship/bond between a man and a woman, one has to strain credulity beyond the breaking point.

    ONe must show unrelanting love to all (including homosexuals), but the activity cannot be condoned in any way, including redefining marriage.

    Tim

    • http://brokentelegraph.com Ian E

      Hi Tim.  Thanks for reading and considering the post.

      First of all, I grew up in the right wing, and as a proud member of it at the time, in those circles and in those churches, so I know conservatism from the inside-out. I was one myself until about five years ago, and now I’m an independent (sorry to disappoint your liberal assumption, Keith Carr61).

      Nothing in my article attempts to “deny what God has established as the intended relationship/bond between a man and a woman” within the church. I was quite clear about that when I wrote “All of this isn’t to say that the church should give up on wrestling with the complexities of sexual orientation, nor is it to say that the church itself should perform gay marriage ceremonies. Those matters require far more than one blog post. At the very least, and perhaps as a start, we need to surrender the legislative conflict while practicing more humility and recognizing our shared humanity.”

      This is about the role of the church in the wider world (outside of its “walls”), the mistake of legislative restriction propped up by the church when it comes to personal choices between willing adults, apologizing for the hurt and pain caused by the church’s ugly rhetoric and for picking the wrong fight, and for our failure to invest in people because we’re focused on refereeing sin in the wider world and have even attempted to restrict liberty for some based on our own morality, while missing our own sin which develops as a result.

  • Keith Carr61

    Hypocracy at its worst. The sin of homosexuality is rebuked quite clearly in Bible. To call for the acceptance of an abomination against Gods plan for men and women is itself an abomination. I hope you are not a preacher and spreading your garbage to young impressionable minds. I could really get cranked up and rebuke you as a supposed Christian but I will refrain as I am too tempted to to go on a rant. Suffice it to say that this not only is a slap in Gods face but it is a lame attempt to justify an abhorent behaviour. Shame on you and I hope Im somewhere around when God holds you accountable for distorting the gospel. If people are hurt from the truth of Gods word then tough. I cant believe the liberal garbage on this site..

    • Yesnoyes Yes

      Unreal! Seemingly, you have more hate, stored in your tiny little brain, than most non-Christians! And don’t give me that, “righteous anger” BS. Compassion would look good on you…

      • Keith Carr61

        Why is it that when you call out a direct conflict with scripture that you are a hater?? Got to ask yourself who has the “tiny little brain” here? Why do I need to be compassionate? Compassionate about what? Compassionate about homosexuality? I am compassionate about people however not sin as that is what this is and is addressed in the Bible. The intolerance here is not the Christians who disagree with you …..it is your intolerance to Scripture…go figure? The “anger” I feel is with so-called Christians who want to compromise the Bible for the sake of hurting someones feelings……LIKE YOU.  Nowhere in the Bible can you find Jesus saying “come unto me and I will lift all your burdens except homosexuallity” Once again this is about keeping the church scriptural and not compromising it just for the sake of a crowd of people who dont want to give up their sinful lifestyle. For Gods sake you want to apologize for teaching what the gospel says just because you dont have enough spine to stand up for what ‘you should believe in’?
        NEWSFLASH FOR YOU    There are many people who have vices and sins they carry into the church and they too suffer the scrutiny that comes from the convicting word of God. You are on a slippery slope.

        • Feraarie

          Keith, Just came on this site today.  I did a long reply to yesnoyes above in your defense. Did not have time to check for spelling mistakes above.  So there are a few.  Apologies.

          Nothwithstanding It does seem like you are going through a tough time on here.  However, you speak in biblical language.  Do not get frustrated as I said above.  Not everyone will have spiritual understanding.  Bible tells us to be patient with one another.  I use to feel a little frustrated also when i found people not reading the bible to educate themselves.  However, we must remember that every person or christian will be at a different growth level.  It also depends on the denomination of the church they attend.  Some churches are heavily bible teaching others are less.

          I think you have stayed true to the word of God and because you are standing firm that may upset some people.  I think also change your tone to be a bit more gentle whilst biblically speaking. Perhaps people will see more of the compassion side side to you.  I do agree with you though.  It is infuriating that christians no longer stand up for the word of God.  But to the thinking of society. The bible also says in the new testiment that we should encourage one another and especially if we are doing wrong (committing sin) we have to mention it.  In a loving way and help each other change.  I here you, but let your tone come across with more tolerance.  As God is patient and tolerant with us…

          Feraarie

      • Keith Carr61

        Oh and one more thing…..”tiny little brain’?  seems you have more hate in you than you want to admit…..Also, you are on the left and the left always reverts to the ‘hater’ arguement when you dont have a better one.

      • Feraarie

        Mr Yesnoyes no (interesting name by the way) and everyone on here that is giving Mr Keith a hard time and perhaps Doug. Yes Keith does sound a little harsh. I have read all his thread and replies to you all. Only a Christian who has the true spirit of God and medicates on the word of God will not be offended.  You that say Keith has hate.  Truely he does not.  Everything he has written he has spoken as a true christian.  He is simply standing on what the bible says.

        Although Keith I may agree with your points.  And do agree that christians seems to be afraid these days to speak the truth of the bible and you are doing your part.  You just need to come across a little gentle.  I think that is what people are seeking on here. 

        Our beloved God has said homosexuality is definitely one of the sins mentioned in the bibile.  He even destroyed a whole city and its people due to this ACT.  Really in all honesty we cannot try and change the word of God to suit modern society.  The word of God never changes am afraid. Its a fact.  Keith may sound ‘hard lined’ but he speaks as a christian who reads the word of God and tries to live it and is attempting to share it. 

        I think it is wrong to insult a man who speaks the truth about what God says in the bible. 

        Though I agree that he should come across more gentle and subtle – with compassion, tolerance, patience, love and understanding of a human condition.  These characters/ discipline should be extented to people who have same sex attraction or indeed anyone who is living a life not contrary to the word of God.  There is also the case of gay people who are not christians or even have any belief at all.  Their thinking will be different to christians and will certaintly not take the bible to account towards gayism.

        Unless you are in a gay person;s their shoes, one will never know what they go throught, what battles they have to fight every day.  Some homosexuals wish they never felt what they are feeling and yet cannot help what they feel.  Others are content.  Either way as christains we can NEVER JUDGE.  Infact God has said it is a sin to judge each other. Only he can judge. I came to understand why God tells us not to judge.  He alone only knows the heart of the person we judge. Only he knows what makes a person who they are…. What the future or past of that person is…. Our judgement of a person will always be wrong as we will never know what a person is going through.  We judge  people based on what we see on the outside or through hear say… He without sin cast the first stone. 

        Churches, Pastors, Bishops, Elders have to accept gay people in the church regardless.  Their job is to preach the gospel and educate us on what the bible says. To tell the truth, but with compassion and understanding.   It is only the GRACE OF GOD that changes man or woman.  We are sprit, body and soul.  When God intervens into our lives and we welcome him to do his work – he does.  I dont know how some people are gay and some are not. A persons’s sexuality should have nothing to do with a person attending church.  We are all sinners when we enter into church.  Some will be having affairs, some would have been murders, some will be gay…However, those of you who are gay it is the Pastor’s duty to speak the truth of what God says.  And if a person is a practicing homosexual they will not like to hear what the bible says.  Am sure it is difficult.  Putting myself in any situation…

        In my opinion this is where all the problem stem from.  It must be just too painful to be in a gay relationship, loving God or not and hearing that this act or relationship is not acceptable to God or man.  I have empathy on this.

        PROBLEM / ISSUE
        For whilst its none of my business how a person choses to live their life (again only God judges that person not me). I cannot agree with same sex marriages.  I Stand firm on that. I think the government is corect to block any legislation.  Because it is the duty of a christian country and a christiant government to exercise the Law of God. Although I understand that gay people want to have the right to live their life and the protection of the law.  I am speaking as a christian who tries also on a daily basis to fight sin. And sin for me on a daily basis could be: loosing my temper or telling little lies for being late.  The other sins other people maybe in or fighting could be:  Homosexuality, adultry, incest, son sleeping with father’s wife, sex before marriage and many more are all under sin. Therefore we are all fighting some kind of sin daily. Rather be hostle to homosexuals we all just have to pray for one another.  Again, those fighting for same sex marraige, it will definitely not be pleasing to God for not.  However, I repeat it is my prayer that God almight opens our spirit eyes and being to know the TRUTH.  Weather being homosexual is right or wrong.  Only Jesus can speak to individuals about this issue.  There are many people who attend church and read the bible and yet has no spiritual understanding.  

    • Benmanben

      Keith,
      I agree that homosexuality is sinful.
      I think  what this article is trying to say, (though I’m not sure it does a good job,)
      is that people tempted by it (People born or who become attracted to the opposite sex, the cause not being very important,) shouldn’t be kicked out of the Church.

      Now, it does seem that the article also suggests that homosexual marriage should be allowed, and it seems to somewhat suggest that homosexuality is not a sin, which I don’t like.

      I hope you understand that I am not defending homosexual behaviors, merely trying to say that I’m against the hating of homosexuals, (which I believe you are too.)

      I’m not saying I agree with this article, as it seems to not make a clear enough statement, and I’m not saying that hating homosexuality is the same as hating homosexuals, (I understand the difference.)

      Please understand that I believe homosexual behavior is a sin, 
      I just don’t think we should hate sinners, as we are all sinning.
      I think we agree on that.

    • Benmanben

      Keith,
      I agree that homosexuality is sinful.
      I think  what this article is trying to say, (though I’m not sure it does a good job,)
      is that people tempted by it (People born or who become attracted to the opposite sex, the cause not being very important,) shouldn’t be kicked out of the Church.

      Now, it does seem that the article also suggests that homosexual marriage should be allowed, and it seems to somewhat suggest that homosexuality is not a sin, which I don’t like.

      I hope you understand that I am not defending homosexual behaviors, merely trying to say that I’m against the hating of homosexuals, (which I believe you are too.)

      I’m not saying I agree with this article, as it seems to not make a clear enough statement, and I’m not saying that hating homosexuality is the same as hating homosexuals, (I understand the difference.)

      Please understand that I believe homosexual behavior is a sin, 
      I just don’t think we should hate sinners, as we are all sinning.
      I think we agree on that.

  • Keith Carr61

    I just cant sit and not post this. If you believe this then you also can come to the conclusion that pedaphiles are just following their hearts and need to be accepted in the church. Maybe we need to apologize to the adults who seduce and rape young children. Am I comparing homosexuality with these people..UMM yes I am as most are homosexuals. Remember that homosexuality was illegal in most states at one time. As we have ‘evolved’ (joke) we are so intellectually advanced that we now accept this behaviour as ‘normal’  If this happened withy homosexuality it can happen with pedaphelia…not a stretch at all, in fact it is a logical progression of what you espouse.
    Why dont you want to argue the ‘born’ or ‘choice’ ? I will tell you why, because you know that the Bible specifically addresses this type of deviant behaviour and you know in your heart that God is going to hold you accountable for your misrepresenting his word or his intended message.
    No one said that homosexuals couldnt attend church and be treated with dignity as I know some who attend and are treated well. What the problem seems to be, even with you which is a disgrace, is that they want the church to affirm their behaviour and be able to hold positions in the church without any scrutiny. NEWSFLASH…..All church leaders, teachers, song leaders etc…should be held accountable. I mean I really dont want my preacher standing in the pulpit  after a binge of jack and coke. If you are a homosexual and want to attend church please feel free to do so but just as you would be rebuked for drinking, cursing, smoking, stealing, etc in church you cant expect a congregation of believers in Gods word to put aside the Bible and say “Oh we are so sorry that you feel rejected….its ok…what can we do to help you sin??”
    Apologize….You bet your sweet bippy YOU NEED TO APOLOGIZE  FOR WRITING SUCH BLASPHEMY. I believe that teachers, preachers, or anyone in religious authority will be held to a higher standard as they are trusted to lead the flock in the correct direction according to Gods word. You my friend are in a very bad place and I would really hate to be in your shoes. I wouldnt want to be the leader of the erosion of Gods word in the U.S.but obviously you dont fear a God who specifically gave you the answer to your dilema.

    • Holldoug

      Keith

      ‘ Remember that homosexuality was illegal in most states at one time. As we have ‘evolved’ (joke) we are so intellectually advanced that we now accept this behaviour as ‘normal’  If this happened withy homosexuality it can happen with pedaphelia…not a stretch at all, in fact it is a logical progression of what you espouse.’

      Exactly buddy that is exactly it. 50 years ago if you said there will come a time for gay marriage you’d have been laughed out of the bar. You wonder if pederasty will be ‘ok’ in 50 years time ? Indeed it was the influence of Christianity that eliminated pederasty form Greek and Roman culture. If Christianity retreats you can only wonder what horrors our ‘enlightened ones’ have in store as ‘normal’. Sure the response will be ‘the slippery slope fallacy’ but given the advance of Godless attitudes you can only wonder if it is not a fallacy.

      No doubt the battle cry in years to come will be to be nonjudgmental on the pedophile and for the church to be more welcoming to pedophiles and for ‘dialogue not judgment’.

      I fail to see how Christians should give the crown of social respecability of marriage to homosexuality when in every 5 or so occasions that it is mentioned in the Bible homosexual practice is condemned. Sounds to me that some are more interested in approval from the world than what the Bible teaches.

    • http://jesusjusticeandjargon.blogspot.com/ Schuyler Stallcup

      1. I would hope pedophiles feel accepted in the Church. If not, we’re not doing our job.      

      2. The fact that you list “drinking, cursing, and smoking” as sins causes me to take your argument less seriously. You seem to be all about what the Bible says in regards to homosexuality (as am I), but would you mind showing me one single verse that prohibits drinking, smoking, or “cursing” (whatever that is). You’ll probably mention the verse that says our body’s are a temple for the Holy Spirit as a defense for not smoking, and I would agree with you, but I doubt you’ll find anything else. I think it’s interesting that you list drinking, cursing, smoking, and stealing, which I imagine are things you successfully refrain from. But what about greed, pride, and judging others. Why not mention those? After all, Jesus talked about those things and he never talked about drinking, cursing, or smoking (or homosexuality for that matter). Maybe it’s because you are guilty of committing those sins every day and it’s much easier to point the finger elsewhere. 

      If you believe that when a homosexual walks into a church, they should have the Bible immediately opened to Romans 1 for them and that if a Christian doesn’t point out the immorality they see in homosexuality to them constantly then they aren’t being faithful to the Gospel, I would just say this: expect me to have twenty Bibles opened to the many verses over not judging others, for you when you walk into church next Sunday. 

      You and I could joust with these logs we have in our eyes. 
      Love and Peace

      • Keith Carr61

        Schuyler, I am not singling out any sin…In fact I was using the illustration to say that all sin is subject to condemnation from God and if you attend church then you shouldnt get your feelings hurt when the preacher touches on that subject matter. Also, I will say that I wouldnt expect my church to condone an affair I was having either no matter what the circumstances. If I choose to live in that sin then I accept it is sin but I dont get my feelings hurt when my brothers or sisters in Christ confront me with it either.
        The point is that no one is berrating these individuals. If they want to live their life that way fine. The problem comes when they want to be confirmed and affirmed by the masses and especially churches. You as a Christian should never affirm that activity just as you wouldnt affirm an affair or any other sinful lifestyle. If that is offensive to a homosexual then tough. It  continues to be amazing to me that people cant separate the scriptural stance from the “loving the individual’ stance. If you cant witness to a homosexual without affriming their lifestyle then you have already lost the battle. As for pointing out their lifestyle when they enter the church….I think that is a little far fetched dont you think? My point was  that just as I would expect to be chastised for showing unnatural attention to another mans wife at church they shouldnt expect to walk in Gods house and display sinful behavour.  The problem is, as I have already said, is that they want to be affirmed by the church and that is not possible. Im sorry but this is not just as article about homosexuality so much as it is about deligitimizing the church and sin….Im sure the devil is happy.

        • Benmanben

          Keith,

          I want to clarify that I believe SOME people do treat homosexuals badly, even though they shouldn’t.

          I understand that you are just trying to point out homosexuality as a sin, and that YOU are not for such treating, but let’s recognize that it does happen sometimes, (though I think some people here just want to lump you in with people who actually hate others.)

          • Keith Carr61

            Thanks Ben…At least you honest in your assessment. I appreciate that. Your last sentence is correct and the crux of the matter. It is the same argument the left uses when racism or any other delicate topic is challenged. Hater Hater…..for some to be so intellectual you would think they could see the difference as you have.

      • Benmanben

        Saying homosexuality is a sin is different from judging people.

        If pointing out something as a sin is judgmental, than were you not just judging greedy people by saying greed was a sin?

        • Keith Carr61

          Ooopppssss LOL

    • Wiljo

      I find it interesting Keith that you can so readily quote from the Journal of Homosexuality, but at the same time you seem to be so illiterate in your understanding of the Bible.  Have you ever really researched the history of marriage in the Bible? If we really want to lend credence to the thousands of years of tradition, do you think that we maybe should embrace polygamy again?  Have your researched the thousands of years of traditions regarding the place of women in a marriage, in any relationship, in a family, etc?   Would you have felt it more appropriate for Lot to have given up his daughters to be raped?   Are you really aware of what the “sin of Sodom” was considered to be?  Why do you think that the subject of Homosexuality was never discussed by Jesus? Have you ever really conducted a word study on the words that were translated to the word homosexuality?   Have you ever asked yourself which may be a greater sin, homosexuality or infidelity?  If you were to consider the wholeness of Jesus’ teaching, which issue, homosexuality or infidelity, do you think his message spoke about more?   Do you realize that Jesus was widely condemned by his critics (religious types mostly) for his embracing those “sinners” and considering them children of God?   What do you understand to be sin in the first place?   The Jewish people seemed to think they had a pretty good handle on their understanding of sin.  Jesus taught us that they completely missed the mark.  What is your understanding?  Do you think that Jesus spoke of sin in a different context then was religious leaders of his day?   Isn’t that why he was constantly being questioned?   Isn’t that why we don’t concern ourselves so much with the hundreds of laws, many with the penalty of death, cited in Leviticus, Deuteronomy, etc.  Have you ever asked yourself why the issue of homosexuality is such a hot issue for Christians but the issue of divorce, domestic violence, infidelity, genocide, starvation, people suffering illness, disease and death due to a lack of healthcare?   For me, I’m pretty sure with all of the pain, suffering, greed, depression, violence, disease and hunger there is in this world, I just have a hard time believing that Jesus would consider this the hot button issue that so many Churches are making it out to be.      

      • Keith Carr61

        Romans 1:22-28King James Version (KJV)
        22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient  I posted this because you and many like you are exactly what verse 22 describes. I dont have to know all the history of everything in the Bible my friend. I have discernment that comes when you allow Jesus to enter your heart and gives you an internal meter that goes off when I sin or am in the presence of sin. Your ramblings about all of this are of no significance. The following scripture tells us exactly how God felt about Sodom and their reprobate minds. No one is saying that the ONLY reason they were destroyed is because of homosexuality but that was the last thing discussed before the angels said “get the heck out of Dodge” and dont look back. Your intellectual rants dont impress me at  all. If only educated people, who had the time and resources to spend researching the Bible, could understand and interpret it then there would be many who would be lost. God is not the author of confusion…His message is simple and effective and he doesnt need to have a Bible scholar or a Harvard grad to interpret it for the masses. Shame on you and I want to hear your warped reasoning for the following verses. 1 Now the two angels came to Sodom in the evening as Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them and [a]bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 And he said, “Now behold, my lords, please turn aside into your servant’s house, and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise early and go on your way.” They said however, “No, but we shall spend the night in the square.” 3 Yet he urged them strongly, so they turned aside to him and entered his house; and he prepared a feast for them, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate. 4 Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house, both young and old, all the people [b]from every quarter; 5 and they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may [c]have relations with them.” 6 But Lot went out to them at the doorway, and shut the door behind him, 7 and said, “Please, my brothers, do not act wickedly. 8 Now behold, I have two daughters who have not [d]had relations with man; please let me bring them out to you, and do to them [e]whatever you like; only do nothing to these men, inasmuch as they have come under the [f]shelter of my roof.” 9 But they said, “Stand aside.” Furthermore, they said, “This one came in [g]as an alien, and already he is acting like a judge; now we will treat you worse than them.” So they pressed hard against [h]Lot and came near to break the door. 10 But the men reached out their [i]hands and brought Lot into the house [j]with them, and shut the door. 11 They [k]struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they wearied themselves trying to find the doorway  As a footnote: I have read the GAY translation for these verses and I must say that if they really believe their own garbage then I have some swampland for sale that is really just wet concrete…THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO CONSTRUE THIS STORY BUT THEIR ARE MANY WAYS FOR A FALSE PROPHET TO MISCONSTRUE IT.

        • Bill

          1.  I’m not sure why you saw this as an intellectual rant as mostly what I did was asked questions?  Perhaps they were good questions or questions you did not feel like you could answer -  I don’t know.  I do know that you didn’t answer any of them.  

          2.  I would be interested in knowing why you believe your discernment is more valid then mine.   Are you open to the idea that your discernment may be mistaken, or do you have perfect knowledge?

          3.  If you continue to read the scripture you will find that the sin of Sodom was the hardness of their hearts.  I’ve got to say that I find that interesting given the context of this discussion.   What do you think of Lot offering up his daughters?  Good idea?

          4.  “There is no other way to construe this story”?  You’ve got to be kidding!  

          5.  Consider this – more dangerous then not knowing something is not knowing that you do not know!   

  • Keith Carr61

    Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly
    they are ravening wolves

    False prophets – The word prophet originally means one who foretells future
    events. As prophets, however, were commonly regarded as public instructors on
    the subject of religion, the word came to denote all who were religious
    teachers. See the notes at Romans
    12:6. In this sense it is probably used here. A false prophet is a teacher
    of incorrect doctrine, or one falsely and unjustly laying claims to divine
    inspiration

  • Keith Carr61

    The Journal of Homosexuality recently published a special double-issue
    entitled, “Male Intergenerational Intimacy,” containing many articles portraying
    sex between men and minor boys as loving relationships. One article said parents
    should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or
    competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s
    upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home.”

    In 1995 the homosexual magazine “Guide” said, “We can be proud that the gay
    movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out
    loud that children are naturally sexual” and “deserve the right to sexual
    expression with whoever they choose. …” The article went on to say: “Instead of
    fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good,
    including children’s sexuality … we must do it for the children’s sake.”

    Larry Kramer, the founder of ACT-UP, a noted homosexual activist group,
    wrote in his book, “Report from the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist”:
    “In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be
    they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires
    the activity, and perhaps even solicits itRead more: Report: Pedophilia more
    common among ‘gays’ http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=13722#ixzz1dpiySI9S

    • Holldoug

      A timely warning Keith. Good on you for speaking up.

    • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

      Look at the source… WND. An extreme right-wing, fundamentalist, news site. No thanks.

      • Keith Carr61

        Well lets take a modern day example Greg….Ever watch Predator files? How many women show up to have sex with a young boy???  I dont ever remember even one  but how many MEN show up to have sex with underage boys???   Too many to count…It may be a right wing site but seems to me they have a good grasp on the problem.

      • Doug

        Even if the site was extreme and I doubt it is – the site is quoting pro-homosexual sources !

        Since when did quoting homosexual sources make you a right-wing fundamentalist ? It is, after all , only quoting their own words.

  • amy

    I think it’s time to delete some comments here.  

    • Keith Carr61

      LOL, I tried but it wouldnt let me ;)

  • Keith Carr61

    Dont trivialize this issue with velour track suits and yachts. The fact is that the gay community wants to be recognized and affirmed…..SOMETHING THE CHURCH CANNOT DO 

  • Anonymous

    so you support GLBT which, to some, may seem a bit close-minded.  What about LGBTQ, MSM, and SGL, or even LGBTQP (for those that believe they’ve been born with a polyamorous orientation) or sexual triads?  yeah, I used wikipedia.  these terms are at most 30 years old and you’re putting them up against church traditions that extend over thousands of years.  i cringe to think who may be out there that might wish to add another letter to this list.  i am not saying i am against two men or two women getting married.  rather, it is the formation of the movement and the definitions of terms that are the largest problem.  i think the best opportunity for a solution lies in re-evaluating the very decision making process used by any couple when considering marriage.  who is involved in this process?  are all types of planned marriages so innately evil, are the risks to personal opinion within them as severe as we assume?  i don’t honestly know.

  • Holldoug

    When those opposed to gay marriage also claim to be strict adherents to Biblical literalism, they should then be the first ones to destroy the term “sanctity of marriage” because it can be found exactly nowhere in Scripture. Sanctity of marriage is a man-made concoction, used to claim the moral high ground in the same way that organizations use “family” or “freedom” in their title as if they hold a monopoly on virtue.
    No the sanctity is not a man-made concoction – Hebrews 13:4 NIV Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.from online dictionaryHebrews 13:4 NIV Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.
    from online dictionarysanctity
    1. holiness, saintliness, or godliness.
    2. sacred or hallowed character: the inviolable sanctity of the temple.
    3. a sacred thing.
    Respectfully Ian I think you’re in sharp error here.

    • http://brokentelegraph.com Ian Ebright

      You missed the point, Holldoug.

      You are deducing sanctity of marriage from the text, but it’s not found on the page.

      i was attempting to reveal the disconnect in the consistency of Biblical literists thinking, who lean so heavily on the “on the page” language while rejecting answers found outside of the actual text. 

      I was not arguing that God himself has no definition of marriage.

      • Doug

        Sorry Ian but that is well frankly mischevious.

        “You are deducing sanctity of marriage from the text, but it’s not found on the page. ”

        No but its found in THE BOOK.

        Homosexuality is condemned in every mention of THE BOOK. Now we want this behaviour given the crown of respectability via legal sanction of marriage. Now tell me any law that didnt have a moral basis behind it ?

      • Keith Carr61

        So you admit that Gods definition of marriage is between a man and a woman?

        Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’” (Matthew 19:4-

        Or will you try and twist the meaning of this passage also?

  • friendofTheFriendtoall

    How is this a complicated issue with Romans 1 and Genesis 2:24? God’s word is very specific on this topic…

    • Wiljo

      It gets complicated
      because of verses like – Exodus 35:2; Leviticus 11:7; Exodus 21:7; Deuteronomy
      23:1; Genesis 38:8-10;  1 Samuel 18:25-27;
      Deuteronomy 25:11-12 and the hundreds of others like them.  And then there are all
      of those lessons Jesus taught about the things that were really important to
      entering the kingdom of heaven – none of which mentioned sexual
      orientation.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/jedwalls Jedediah Walls

    This is great. 

  • Cnlpeltier

    I’m not sure how you can responsibly read the Bible and come to the conclusion that homosexuality is “right” or God’s intention…and we shouldn’t begin to say it’s right because it’s PC or more convienient…that being said

    1) there’s a lot of sexual sin outlined in the scripture, including adultary and pre-marital sex…most of us evangelicals don’t get our knickers in a knot over these, and homosexuality shouldn’t be elevated to the only unpardonable sexual sin

    2) the message of Jesus is a message of grace…anyone who is out holding anti-gay picket signs is seriously out of touch with the character of Christ and needs to repent

    3) Everyone, gay and straight, needs Jesus! I say come and walk on the road with jesus for awhile and then work out your sexuality in the context of your relationship with God. No one appointed me to be your judge (thank goodness – got enough windows in my own glass house)

  • Cnlpeltier

    I’m not sure how you can responsibly read the Bible and come to the conclusion that homosexuality is “right” or God’s intention…and we shouldn’t begin to say it’s right because it’s PC or more convienient…that being said

    1) there’s a lot of sexual sin outlined in the scripture, including adultary and pre-marital sex…most of us evangelicals don’t get our knickers in a knot over these, and homosexuality shouldn’t be elevated to the only unpardonable sexual sin

    2) the message of Jesus is a message of grace…anyone who is out holding anti-gay picket signs is seriously out of touch with the character of Christ and needs to repent

    3) Everyone, gay and straight, needs Jesus! I say come and walk on the road with jesus for awhile and then work out your sexuality in the context of your relationship with God. No one appointed me to be your judge (thank goodness – got enough windows in my own glass house)

    • Earlybird

      Beautifully said!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cynthia-Norman-Slappy/100000039073391 Cynthia Norman Slappy

      This is about the most sensible post in this discussion thread. Well stated!

  • Amy

    I am coming to this discussion with both feet firmly planted in the ally camp, so take what I say as you will.

    I have said for years (even before I actively supported gay civil rights) that allowing marriage equality strengthens, not weakens, the concept of marriage. Because if it’s no more than a piece of paper or a legal contract, then why should it be so highly coveted? To me, that’s a testament to how powerful marriage is.

    As for the Bible passages that people use to condemn the sin of homosexuality: there are only 6, and Christians don’t agree on their meaning. It’s fine to disagree, but lovingly consider what other people have to say before coming down hard on them. It might be helpful to read up on opposing viewpoints.

    I am saddened by the tone of a lot of the posts here. It seems like there is blatant disregard for the feelings of those LGBT folks who might have read this, looking for a ray of hope–and continuing to find hatred, fear, and tired arguments dehumanizing them. Please listen to their stories with open hearts.

    • Keith Carr61

      God doesnt care about your feelings….he cares about your soul, As for the meaning of the scripture on his topic….It is blatantly clear and the so called Christians that dont agree with this are FALSE PROPEHTS

      • LK

        Seriously, get a life keith.  I’ve been reading the responses to this article for a while now and I’m so tired of hearing your hate.  How many non-Christians have EVER responded positively to your hard-lined black and white banter?!  Sit back and look at what kind of witness you are being.  You’ll retort with, “i’m not concerned with man’s judgement, only Jesus’ judgement.” But Jesus called us to live in the world Keith!  You are not helping anyone come closer to the LOVE of God with all that poison on your tongue.  Repent keith!   I’m a Christian woman and I ashamed to call you a brother in Christ. 

        • Doug

          I dont see any hate from Keith LK.  He is simply witnessing for what he sees as the word of God. To claim that he is deterring people from God by disagreeing with the pro-homosexual lobby is as false as saying smoking is medically harmful is unchristian too because we are not showing nicotine addicts love! What are we saying ? Should Elijah not have condemned the prophets of Baal as that was just another lifestyle choice and we should show them love not rebuke ?

          • Keith Carr61

            Excellent Doug. Lets take an example of Over Eaters Anonymous; If a group of people who knew they had a problem (sin)  formed a group to try and meet weekly to uplift each other, hold each other accountable, and strenghen their resolve (church), were to allow a 500 lb. person to come every week and bring 5 buckets of KFC, 15 candybars, 20 hamburgers etc to the meeting and eat all of this at the meeting then what  should be the reaction of the group?
            (a) tell them its ok and you really dont have a problem
            (b) buy them more food so they will come back
            (c) tell them they understand but they will have to refrain from the buffett while at the meeting
            or worse
            (d) start pigging out with them as it doesnt really matter anyway

          • Richard

            Doug and Keith, I do not support the position held by those pushing the homosexual agenda, but I think you may be going a little far here.

            I’d like you to consider a couple of passages of scripture: 1 Corinthians 13:1-3 “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.”
            Matthew 10:16 ““Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be wise as serpents and harmless as doves.”

            Seriously gentlemen, there is a much better way to lead people to Jesus….

          • Richard

            Doug and Keith, I do not support the position held by those pushing the homosexual agenda, but I think you may be going a little far here.

            I’d like you to consider a couple of passages of scripture: 1 Corinthians 13:1-3 “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.”
            Matthew 10:16 ““Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be wise as serpents and harmless as doves.”

            Seriously gentlemen, there is a much better way to lead people to Jesus….

          • Steven

            Doug, both you and Keith deserve each other. You’re both disgusting. 

          • Doug

            Why is that Steven?
            Think about what you have written. Isn’t that judgemental ? Which is the very thing you are condemning ( presumably ).
            No doubt the Prophets of Baal said Elijah was ‘disgusting’ too as he didnt show them ‘love’, didnt respect their ‘diversity’, and was ‘judgemental’.

          • Keith Carr61

            Good term Steven….I believe the term ‘spew’ comes to mind when I read the liberal posts here ;)    As for deserving Holldoug…I embrace him as you however I must embrace what the Bible tells me first and foremost. Exactly what is it that bothers you about the Bible?? Is it that you cant bend it to fit your wants, needs, desires? Is it that you cant find scripture to tell you that homosexuality is ok? Can you even find scripture that says for you to lie down with another man and how to live that way in Gods will????????? So exactly what is it that bothers you and makes you  call someone who is sticking up for biblical teachings “disgusting?” Maybe the disgusting feeling in your heart is the devil pulling on your conformity desires. Who knows but I bet one thing is for sure. If God were here you wouldnt be espousing this nonsense unless you were a foolish man. You are called out to be different not a conformist.
            As for Holldoug, I think he is right on target and a brother in Christ and I applaud him for his stance.
            NOTICE THAT I DID NOT ATTACK YOU AS YOU DID ME. I ADDRESSED THE TOPIC

        • Keith Carr61

          It really doesnt matter to me whether you call me brother, racist, intollerant, etc…. My points have been about what “God” says…You on the other hand have fallen victim to the talking points from the left wing, thinktank that wants to rewrite scripture and live like the love children of the 60′s. If my stance on what I believe offends you then maybe you should ask yourself why? Why is it that I am standing for what is Biblically sound and I am the bad guy in your eyes? REPENT? LOL I wonder just how affirming a lifestyle contrary to Gods will could help someone find Christ? How do you witness to people? Do you say God loves and and accepts you as you are and you can keep all your baggage as he is only interested in the moment? What is your follow up to a new Christian? Live you life as if you are going to Heaven anyway so nothing else matters? What about the instructions God gives us to live our life by as a Christian?  You dont anoy me LK….You amuse me and in the end all of this banter about affriming homosexuality will be ruled on by the ultimate Judge and I will be more than happy to review my stance. As for repenting, I do that quite regularly thank you but if I need you to help me determine when I need to do so ….I will let you know. ;)

          Bottom line…..AGAIN…. is that the Christian community is not bringing this fight and to ask the church to apologize for preaching the gospel is ludicrous. You should be standing with Christians who follow the scripture….not who follow the crowd.

          • Seth

            Do you trim your beard? Do you wear more than one kind of fiber in your clothes? Do you eat shellfish? Taking scripture as literally as you do means that ALL of these things are “abominations”. These things are put on te same level in scripture. Everyone picks and chooses what to follow, because times have changed. Anyone who pretends this is not so does not understand the purpose of the Law and is ignorant. We are called to live lives filled with loving others. Let God take care of the conviction.

    • Psalms63:7

      I do ache for those who are confused and struggling.  I want them to see that the ray of hope is God and that they can find love in those who love Him, even if those people do not always agree with their actions.  I have seem many quotes that talk say, (for example)  A best friend is a person who knows all about you, and loves you anyway.  I can believe that homosexual acts are sins and not desire to legitimize those acts with a marital stamp of approval, and still love AND respect those who choose to do it.  I do have gay friends that are wonderful people and I do love and respect them.

      • LGBTPersonOfFaith

        Psalm63:7 – I have read several of your posts on this article and one simple thing continues to resonate throughout your (and many other’s) posts. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe “love the sinner and hate the sing” sums it up pretty well. That is all well and good in response to say perhaps lying. Love the liar, hate the lies? But really, how many people do you know call or truly consider themselves to be liars? And if they do, liar has so many negative connotations – I’d wager you’d rarely find someone considering themselves a liar as part of who they fundamentally are.

        You must understand that as a member of the LGBT community (and I will speak for myself, though I have an inkling there are many others like me), when you say “love the person, but hate the homosexuality,” you should be aware that there is no distinction in my mind between the two. I am pansexual – it is who I am. It is as innate in me as being a woman. For you to say that you love me, but hate my homosexuality is for you to say that you hate who I innately am. Whether or not you believe that my attraction to a man, a woman, or anyone else is an innate part of who I am (which I’m sure if you consider who you are attracted to it’s probably a given that it’s an innate part of who you are), doesn’t matter – the way I interpret that phrase (as the individual you are trying to “love”) is what matters matters. I say this to you and anyone else who reads this to open up your mind to the fact that I (and I would assume) many others in the LGBT community (whom you are trying to reach and show love to) take that statement and others like it offensively. Just something to keep in mind as you try to actively love those in the LGBT community.

        And really, would you want to sit in church next to someone who if they really knew who you were would “love” you but hate your relationship with the love of your life, the world you’ve built together, the children you have together and consider it all vulgar and morally wrong just because you’re both women? And we wonder why the LGBT is so hostile toward the church – I can assure you as having been raised in the church and as someone who regularly attends church; somedays it literally takes every ounce of grace and patience to sit an listen to catch phrases like “love the sinner, hate the sin.”

        In regard to the article, honestly it blows my mind. Why should any of you even care if I can get married to the person I love? Does my marriage all the way in New England make any difference to you living perhaps half way across the country? Does the fact that I can marry a woman and receive the same rights and the same benefits you get automatically when you marry a man really offend you so much that you would deny me the same happiness that you’ve experienced in your own marriages? Regardless of whether or not you feel it’s right or wrong, why would you want to deny the legal rights and privileges to me that you automatically receive when you marry the person you love?

        As both a member of the LGBT community and a follower of Christ I really think the church is behind the times on this one. You’d think we’d learn – look at practically ALL of church history. We’re almost always behind the times and a lot of times not only are we behind the times, but we’re also the ones that make things worse. You’d think we’d learn.

        I just have hope that the journey I’ve been on to come to the conclusions and comfort with who I am in Christ and my sexuality is a journey that others around me (not necessarily you who read this post), the people who really know me can travel on as well. Faith is an ever-evolving relationship.

        One final question for those of you who totally disagree with everything I’ve said and everything I am – how many LGBT people do you know? How many LGBT people of faith do you know? Your answer will probably be very telling as to why you are so against me loving someone else and wanting to publicly express my love and have it validated the same as yours or anyone else…

        • Luis

          Homosexuality is not something that you are born with so is not what you are. is what you choose to be, the life you choose to follow and that is your choice. but do not be mistaken. One thing is to love the person and the other is love their abomination. Truth been told if you havent been touched by the Spirit of God you will never understand but i will write it anyway cause when the times comes your eyes will be open and there wont be a chance to go back. Gayness is a decision, it takes away who you really are and separates you from God. Period.

          • Heather

            You are misinformed, Luis. Study after study proves that for many, same-gender attraction is a genetic expression. Also, not to make light of your use of the word “abomination,” but the words Paul used to describe “man laying with a man” in Romans, he also used to describe men with long hair a few passages later. And yet, all of our modern pictures of white Jesus show him with long hair.

            It is obvious that our observance of the scriptures makes leave for cultural shifts. We allow Christian women to worship without head covering. We allow them to braid their hair. We eat shrimp at church potlucks. Men wear hats while they worship and pastors have long hair.

            I say this, because even if a person were to choose to be homosexual, as you claim, it is a cultural shift that the church needs to adapt to, as we have to every other shift throughout history. (Also, if you actually study the Roman culture of the day, the passage in Romans obviously refers to the cultural taboo of two men of equal class sleeping together. It was in fact the only sexual taboo for a high class man.)

            That said, the Law no longer applies to us. We are to be followers of Christ, not followers of the Law. Our lives are to be lives of love, not judgment. And the very next verse, after Paul writes his passage in Romans, is to say blatantly and for all of us to read, that we are not to judge. We are NOT to JUDGE. We are to LOVE.

            You do not determine what separates a person from God. You are not supposed to legislate morality or impose a standard on others. Look in your own eye, sir. Love God. Love your Neighbor as yourself. These are Christ’s directives.

          • jeremyv

            Heather you stated that, “Study after study proves that for many, same-gender attraction is a genetic expression.” Can you cite some evidence to support that assertion? I had a friend a few years ago who was gay and he was an evolutionary biology major at the University of Washington. He admitted that there was no evidence that homosexuality was genetic that he was aware of. As far as I am aware, the only scientific studies that have been done on this matter demonstrate a statistical correlation between increased prenatal stress for a mother and an increased likelihood of the manifestation of homosexuality in men (the results found nothing conclusive for women). This study was done by a German scientist named G. Dorner and published in 1983. The results of this study have not yet been duplicated. This study at MOST indicates that there MAY be a link between prenatal stress influencing (though not necessarily causing) the manifestation of homosexuality in men. And again, the study found no such results for women. I have also read (though at the moment I don’t recall who or where) other scientist admitting that from a scientific perspective there is, as of yet, no conclusive evidence as to the to cause of homosexuality. So, I am quite skeptical of your assertion, and I would like to challenge you (in a friendly way) to provide some real evidence to corroborate your assertion that “…proves that for many, same-gender attraction is a genetic expression.” Take this as a chance to convince a skeptic and convert people to your way of thinking.

    • Luis

      That is lie. Accepting same sex marriage is saying to them come and rape mi kids, teach my kids that a sinful life is good when in fact is not. That takes away the right of the kids to have a father and a mother and the right education. Will affect them mentally and physically and willl also fill their hearts with doubt. Most gay already know this. I was and I knew i was wrong but i believed it was who I was and later God tought me that it wasnt true. That wasnt who I really was. The gay life is not a happy life. Is a life of conflict, rebellion, sadness, abuse, and mental confusion that is what it really is all about. NO TO GAY MARRIAGE what you do in your bed stays in your bed not outside.

  • Samuel

    I hear the cry for acceptance from people struggling with same attraction, but what makes you different from other Christians who have other thorns in the flesh, wha yo should get special treatment above and beyond others with there struggles….
    Let me tell you this God has not changed, he ates sin, homosexuality is sinful, Romans clearly identifies this, let alone the old testament.

    But of blatant willful disobedience in the world,God is allowing Islam to be raised up, it will be one of the main instruments of his judgment.

    It is the anti Christ government, demonic its practices, and wicked. God calls to repentance, and to abstain from sexual perversion, this life is purel probationary in it’s intirety, another words it’s not going to be joy and gladness every day, but at times severe trial.
    GOD is more interested in your character than your comfort level, wake up.

  • Jim

    Just a side note to the conversation, but maybe one for thinkers.  The bible, Jesus, Christianity, has not had a corner on the market for commentary on homosexuality or other forms of sexual activity.

    All the biggies, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism chime in on the subject also, with a very similar tone to what has been discussed thus far.

    Now Christians typically would say that the bible and Jesus words were the words of God. 

    And I would guess we would say that the Koran, Gita, and Buddhist writings were simply religious writings.

    But why is it that there are some universal thoughts, especially on a topic such as homo sexuality?

    It is not just Christians, nor republicans (sorry Tony), nor far right evangelicals, that believe that God has addressed homosexuality.  No, it is almost universal around the globe.  And it is almost universal around the globe that homosexuality goes on.

    So my friends that like to beat up on the far right crowd for the way they perceive they have treated gays, please do honor to the other groups.  Maybe something like this “far right evangelicals, followers of Buddhism, Islam, and Hinduism are all unfair to homosexuals”.

    Lets enlighten the breadth of our view.  And then in a curious way ask “why is it that the 4 main world religions have a similar view toward sexual perversions”?

  • Dan

    What about the reverse of this statement, “What would it mean to the GLBT community to hear from the church in unison “we were wrong to wage this war against you, and we are sorry for it and for all of the ways that we’ve hurt you.””?  Would not it be nice to see the GLBT community respond likewise towards the Christian community?

  • Keith Carr61

     1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3 but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world. 4 You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world. 5 They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. 6 We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit[a] of truth and the spirit of falsehood.

    Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’” (Matthew 19:4-5

    ***Note, Verse 5 above describes this site perfectly. Basically this site would be applauded by the world. Jesus acknowledged that the world does not want to hear the truth thus resisting it so why are some Christians on here adhereing to the Bible and some are not, and are trying to appease the world? The word tells you directly for those who have not turned a deaf ear. Marriage is described by God with the definition of Man and Woman. I am not familiar with ANY verse encouraging, discussing the joy of, rules to live by, treatment of, homosexual partners……ITS NOT IN THE BIBLE PEOPLE….YOU CAN HAVE A GOOD HEART AND REFUSE TO COMPROMISE….ITS WHAT GOD EXPECTS.

  • Antonio du Rocher

    Christ designed marriage from the very beginning with Eve and Adam and right until the very end of which we His Beautiful Bride The Church are completed with Our Lord Christ Jesus at the marriage of The Lamb. You are sadly exceedingly mistaken if you cannot see the pedophiles riding on the coat tails of the homosexists{i.e; NAMBLA=North-American-Man-Boy-Love-Association}. That’s right I’m calling it like it is:Another form of Sexism. We laughed at male sexism in the 1950′s followed by female sexism in the 1970′s then homosexism in the 80′s and so on and you guessed it followed by pedophilia, bestiality and even necrophilia. Need clarification? 1-Saturday Night Live,2- the movie: Kiss. I am sure you could find DOZENS UPON DOZENS MORE if you put your nose to the grind stone for a very short duration. I was faced with the choice of becoming a homosexist and I turned away at a very young age. I do NOT condemn homosexuals but I tell very clearly out of nothing but the compassion of Christ in me for them that there is help available. Intelligent considerate civilizations are not entertained by harming and degrading their members. Antonio L.J. du Rocher

  • http://twitter.com/NVEchols Noah Echols

    This argument is silly.

    love.

  • Annie

    I first fell in infatuation with a woman in my pre-teens. I didn’t really consider myself as gay so I didn’t judge myself as bad I just knew that I adored this older woman. I wasn’t feeling anything sexual particularly, I was only about 12. To start with she was flattered that I always wanted to be with her. My dad was quite a well known evangelical leader in our area so she was pleased that I asked her to visit. My mistake was in not hiding my feelings I guess. I sent her a letter with some song lyrics ( ‘Only you’ if anyone’s interested) with all the ‘I love you’ parts underlined. She freaked out and called a meeting with my dad. I remember being sat on the floor staring at the carpet while she told my dad the awful thing I’d done. My dad’s reply to her has stayed with me and sustained me through many difficult times since. He said ‘Are you telling me my daughter is a lesbian?’ and when she nodded he said ‘Well what’s it to you?’ and asked her to leave.
    I continued through life fancying both men and women, though women far more. I was a ‘good’ Christian girl and was a virgin when I married. All my female friends chatted about how difficult it was to remain a virgin when you the urges to be with your boyfriend are so strong. I thought I was so spiritual, not feeling at all tempted! We had compulsory pre-marital counselling as our housegroup leader insisted upon it. He and his wife asked us if we had any level of sexual experience and we were shocked. Weren’t we supposed to stay pure? They suggested we kiss more. The whole thing was embarassing but I guess they had a better handle on who I was than I did. I somehow thought it would all happen on the honeymoon and was bitterly diappointed when it didn’t. It wasn’t anything I could tell anyone about. We were married after all and divorce was not an option. I felt most sorry for my groom as he had no idea what he was letting himself in for. I still didn’t recognize myself as anything but straight. He was an attentive lover, a handsome man but sleeping with him gave me a strong repulsion. We remained married for 10 years, having sex every few months if I could bear it until I got to the point of nausea. It was akin to the repulsion of sleeping with a brother. After 10 years I said I loved him but I couldn’t sleep with him again and he, understandably, left me. We did try Christian counselling. Of course, I didn’t mention the fancying women thing as I hadn’t really acknowledged it to myself. They listened to us pour our hearts out and then said we should read the Bible more and everything would be ok.
    During our marriage we had moved to a town smaller than but not unlike San Francisco in it’s open culture and acceptance of people. It doesn’t just embrace gays it embraces the idea of difference. Foreign workers and racial minorities have told me they almost never come across racism, and fashions are noticeably diverse. The large evangelical church we joined reacted as though they were living in a war zone with weekly preaches about the evils of homosexuality, divorce, nightclubs and liberal thinking.
    A week after my marriage broke up a close male friend visited me with a letter he had written. It was going to be a suicide note but my ‘fall from grace’ had been a small ray of hope for him that I might not be able to judge him from my own lowly position. The letter outlined his struggles with knowing he was gay (he was 28) but feeling that he could never tell his parents, sisters and the church. He had come to the conclusion that it would be better for everyone if he died. He figured if he made it look like an accident he wouldn’t shame his parents. He loved them so much. I prayed for wisdom and the answer came instantly. I told him I would stand with him, tell his family with him, see him through it all. He sobbed with relief.
    Another week later I received a phone call from the lead elder of the church saying he had heard some interesting things had happened in my household and I wasn’t welcome to attend any more. I had grown up in that group of churches. I had no friends outside of it. When my parents heard about my causing my divorce they broke contact with me. My only contact with my previous life was my sister who has special needs and couldn’t understand why I was being ostracised. I had two young sons and when we bumped into old babysitters in the street they blanked me AND my boys. I just pretended it must have just been someone who looked similar. They were the most desolate six months of my life
    Through it all, every twist and turn, every day, every moment, I knew God to be so close to me. Somehow in that prison of isolation His love became the strongest I have ever felt it.
    All this was 10 years ago and I realise I have typed way too much so please accept my apologies. So- where am I now?
    I am acutely aware that I am bi-sexual, possibly gay. I still have the struggle between wanting to be pure and not wanting to be alone. I have still not come out to my parents even though they are now mortified at how they reacted when I got divorced. I believe my dad knows. I once told him how important it has been to me that he responded all those years ago by defending me. He just nodded and said ‘it was none of her business’. I tried to keep things hidden from my sons. I didn’t want to weird them out I guess but they have grown up in this town and just don’t see it as an issue. I didn’t actually come out to them. A local university professor came to visit and they noted me reacting to her like a high school kid! My 17 year old took me aside and said, ‘Mum, if you’re bi I’d like to think you could tell me.’ Bless him. Thank god for him and for every accepting human being I’ve met.
    Now, I know many of you will want to pick my story to pieces but you can’t say any worse than I’ve already heard. I’ve just written it in the hope that one more person might turn to their kid and say they accept them no matter what or might look at folk in their church and understand that often ‘struggle’ is a more appropriate term than ‘sin’.
    I was on a sixth grade school trip to the original Pilgrim Hall in Penn, England and was outraged by a photo of two men holding mans. I asked the tour guide why they allowed that to be on their ‘community news’ board. He said perhaps their job was to introduce people to God and perhaps it was God’s job to judge them.

    • Annie

      Oops…typo…a photo of two men holding HANDS! :o )

    • Travis

      I’m simply glad, Annie, that you are finally able to begin living more authentically, more in alignment with the truth about yourself.  Doing so will result in less energy spent on maintaining a facade and freeing those resources to give toward things with lasting value. What I notice, both from my own experiences in my ‘churched’ youth and today still, is that it seems many people, and too many Americans IMHO, are simply afraid of sexuality, period.  Getting one’s genitals into a situation where they can receive some stimulation feels pretty great. My three year old nephew knows this. As long as ‘toucher’ and ‘touchee’ are both consenting adults, I could care less who’s doing what with whom.

      But, what gives American heterosexuals the right to discriminate through legislation against those of other orientations, just because their motivation originates from the notion that they have a mandate from their invisible, unprovable God to do so? Reality check. Not everyone believes in God, or the Bible as God’s word.  Certainly, there is vast disagreement amongst those who do believe as to the interpretation of these texts. So, as far as efforts to publicly legislate go, Ian’s article was SPOT ON!  Quit worrying about other people’s private business. Attempts to deny homosexuals their equality as citizens of this country, only serve to paint those doing so as bigots.

      And Annie, being a bit verbose myself at times, I appreciated your detailed story.  All the best to you and your kids.

      • Keith Carr61

        Invisible, Unproven, God? Get behind me Satan….If you dont believe in God what are you even giving your opinion for?? NEWSFLASH…God doesnt need your approval nor your admission that he is real…..You have a choice..if you stick to your present choice you will find out the truth in the end. God wants you to come to him but if you refuse then so be it. That is the difference between tough love and telling you what you want to hear.
        I hate Annie struggles with sin however most of us do. If someone struggles with pedaphelia then it is  up to them whether they give in to that lust or turn from it. If I lust after another mans wife to the point that I cant resist then I give in to that lust which is sin and the result of sin is separation from God.
        Annie, I do feel your pain in your writing. I will committ to pray for you daily that God would lift the desires you face and help you deal with the reason you cannot be intimate with a man. I suspect it has nothing to do with being gay however God bless you and I hope you allow Jesus to take this from you. 

        • Travis

          Keith,

          I love that I’m lumped in with Satan for suggesting God is both invisible and unprovable.  If you can prove God’s existence, you should definitely write a book or make a movie…you’ll do very well for yourself.  But, alas, you cannot. Certainly not in any testable sense of the word. All you can do is make a personal choice to believe what you believe.

          I gave my opinion because I recognized in Annie’s story a reflection of my own experience in Church and thought I’d at least encourage her in whatever way I could. Not because I’m gay, but because I figured she might hear plenty of arrogant assumptions like the one you’ve made in your post about her incapability to be intimate with a man.  See, I would argue that if Satan’s big ‘sin’ was elevating himself to the same level as God, then your presumption to know something you cannot possibly know is somewhere in the same neighborhood. Esteeming oneself to know things which are impossible was popular in the church I grew up in as well.  Like what happens after death…another popular topic that many people like to pontificate about without actually having died.

          I hope that someday you’ll find enough intellectual courage to admit to yourself that whatever beliefs you have, they are simply and only that…your own personal conclusions.  They may be based on many factors & experiences, they may offer you significant peace of mind and a system by which you can guide your own choices in life, but none of them will ever empirically prove that God exists. I think if you were to admit this simple truth, you’d be a lot more tolerant of the wide variety of perspectives which exist on religious matters, moral matters, etc. As it is, you posture yourself as being pretty certain about things which there is no actual way for you to be certain. It’s called ‘faith’, not certainty, for a reason.

          Cheers,
          Travis

          • Keith Carr61

            Travis, it seems that you have experienced some event in your life that has altered your opinion of who or what God is. Maybe it was a disappointing event or a life changing event that God didnt intervene in. I dont know. What I do know is that you will have a much tougher time proving God doesnt exist than that he does. Just to make that statement shows me youve been hurt or are harboring feelings about something. If you were a true follower of Christ then you wouldnt even think like that so I must assume you were a believer at one time but for some reason you are not now. My response to you is this. There are many “proveable” facts in the Bible. The Bible is about GOD and mans relationship to him. If proveable facts point to anything they point to a living, almighty deity who formed us, gave us hope, and loves us but requires certain things form us.
            I dont believe that Annie needs to hear that God is fictitous or that maybe we are all just walking around waiting for the end of our lives with no purpose and guidance. I dont believe that she can assertain anything from your post except that you are glad she struggles with her God given identity. I understand, am very compassionate about, and hate that Annie is struggling with this issue. I separate this issue just like any other sin that creates a barrier between us and God. There are many reasons that Annie could be unable to be intimate with a man. Whatever the reason, God is not the author of confusion, so if that is true then the confusion must be coming from satan.
            I am really concerned now more for you than for Annie. Annie can overcome her situation however I fear that you are past the point of the ‘reprobate’ mind. Accepting any and all explanations as plausable and possible. You have lost your way in the constant bombardment of contradictory hypothesis that seem to infiltrate the educated who think that they are smarter than God and that the simple minded, lowly, person who trusts in what they interpret of the Bible  is way off base and out of date. I will pray for you buddy. Somehow you need to find your way back to what you once believed and weed out the voices of confusion.
            As for Annie, I spent last night with her on my mind. I pray that some grounded Christian will find their way to her without judgement and love her back to the fold. Annie must understand that she will have to give up her sin if she is to find peace. We can all live in sin and continue our journey in church, life, and society however the Bible teaches us that to really live is to die to self. If we continue in our sin we cut ourselves off from God.

          • Travis

            Keith,

            Of course I’ve experienced events in my life which have “altered my OPINION of who or what God is.”  I’m not sure why this is relevant, since this is exactly true for you and every other human being as well.  What I do like is that you’ve finally used the appropriate word here, ‘opinion’, which is all that either of us have. I’ll also agree with you that God can be neither proven, nor disproved. This is an accurate statement and one which shouldn’t elicit a defensive reaction from anyone who has given it any consideration. It’s obviously true.

            My core issue with some of the writings you’ve posted on this thread is that you assert things which you cannot know or prove, but don’t seem able or willing to admit that these assertions are ultimately just your personal understanding or conclusions.

            I’ll give you an example.  You’ve just asserted that if I were a ‘true’ follower of Christ, then I wouldn’t think in a particular way.  Somewhere, through your understanding of scripture, life, God, or something else along the way, you’ve decided you’re qualified to judge such matters.  But, are you really? While you might be able to construct an argument which supports doing so, I would ask this simple question.  What good does it do anyone anyway? In what possible scenario would God need you to provide commentary on such things, like the eternal destiny of someone else, or the current state of a stranger’s relationship to God, or whether or not someone you’ve never met has intimacy issues?

            And if your basis for making such assertions is the solid confidence that you have, in fact, arrived at the correct interpretation of what the Bible is saying, we’re right back to square one again…personal beliefs. The only entity in this equation qualified to KNOW these things would be an omniscient God.  And, I think we can both agree, you’re not him. Perhaps it is not your intent, but your use of language comes off as self righteous and arrogant.  

            And, if I’m not the only person who experiences you this way, and I’d assert that I likely am not, then your delivery is contrary to what I would imagine your actual goal to be.  Namely, to see as many people as possible experience reconciliation to God.

            My original post said a number of distinct things in it.  My contention that legislating against gay marriage is a poor idea was where I argued that since because God is not a universally accepted idea, much less provable fact, any appeal to biblical doctrine is simply not a fair basis from which to determine legal standards applying to both believers and non-believers alike. Right now, lots of states still don’t allow gay marriage, but this IS NOT a theocracy and until it becomes one, wanting everyone to behave in accordance with biblical principles is a waste of time and energy.  I never attempted, by the way, to argue or convince Annie that she should abandon her faith in God.

            Also, I never said I was GLAD Annie was still struggling, which she did admit. But I am glad that after ten years she’s ‘acutely aware’ of her own identity, which are her words.  Lots of people, regardless of sexual identity, and for other reasons as well, feel as though they cannot really be themselves. At least not with everyone. I contend that the more we can be ourselves and expend less energy on what amounts to lying, the better off we are because our own personal reserves of energy are not being diverted in an effort simply to have others approve of us.

            I’d like to hear if you have any commentary on the actual subject of the article which had to do with whether or not attempting to legislate the ‘gay-marriage’ issue was a good idea, NOT whether or not there is biblical support for calling homosexuality itself a sin.  And, I’m just as fine with dropping it too.

            Peace,
            Travis

          • Keith Carr61

            Well Travis, According to your line of thinking we can just all do whatever we want to…Its a feeeeel goooood life. You cant judge me and I cant judge you…Isnt that what you want?? No one is right and no one is wrong….Its all subjective and we wont know until Christ returns…Unless you think that is an opinion too. As for the subject of Gay marriage…I think think that you will find many laws that are taken straight from the Bible. I mean if we depended on your interpretation of right and wrong…We wouldnt need any laws right?? Who could sit and judge us if we steal, beat or kill?? I think your modern day hogwash belongs…..well with the hogs. As for my arrogance, if you want to equate that to having a spine and standing for what I believe then go ahead but if that is the case then…Are’nt you judging me??

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Westerman/1531760045 Chris Westerman

            So, in other words, you are saying that the scriptures cannot be trusted? Wow!!

          • fgfdg

            The Scriptures are the only source of truth and they MAKE YOU FREE and OPEN YOUR EYES.

      • Doug

        But, what gives American heterosexuals the right to discriminate through legislation against those of other orientations, just because their motivation originates from the notion that they have a mandate from their invisible, unprovable God to do so?

        That Travis is sorry to say an incredibly childish argument. Tell me one piece of legislation that has no moral principle behind it ? Then ask yourself the source of those morals. Lets rephrase your statement to apply to slave owners -

        But, what gives American abolitionists the right to discriminate through legislation against slave owners, just because their motivation originates from the notion that they have a mandate from their invisible, unprovable God to do

        or

        But, what gives American civil rights activists the right to discriminate through legislation against those of superemacists, just because their motivation originates from the notion that they have a mandate from their invisible, unprovable God to do

        Against such backdrops your contention is sorry to say weak, incredibly weak.

        “Reality check. Not everyone believes in God, or the Bible as God’s word. ”

        Reality check Travis, not all of us believes that there was a lightning strike in pondscum a few billion years ago and here we all are talking about it. Besides if the Universe ( and humankind) just the random collisions of chemicals with no ultimate purpose why , in your view, does it matter about the ‘rights’ of biologically disadvantageous mating groupos ? Surely in an uncaring Universe dictated by evoloution alone such concerns are ultimately meaningless ?

         Certainly, there is vast disagreement amongst those who do believe as to the interpretation of these texts. So, as far as efforts to publicly legislate go, Ian’s article was SPOT ON! 

        Disagree – the pro-gay lobby struggle to find a positive sell on homosexuality in the texts. It’s a real struggle to find any positive promotion of homosexuality in the Bible where in every diverse time, context and occurrence it is described negatively.

         Quit worrying about other people’s private business.

        As quoted by slave owners hundreds of years ago. The problem with this mind your own business reasoning is that it suddenly becomes our business to pick up the pieces via taxes for the AIDS, std’s , unwanted pregnancies, abortion, infertility , and hurt of the negative consequences of sexual mores. Or are you saying we shouldnt care and just tell the victims it’s your private business and your private consequences both medically and financially ? Other people’s private business has resulted in a continent of orphans in Africa. Is that non of our business either ? As Christians we have to try and help pick up the pieces, and Christian or not our taxes often have to.

        “Attempts to deny homosexuals their equality as citizens of this country, only serve to paint those doing so as bigots.”

        Is this the Kirk and Marsen marketing strategy to impel acceptance of homosexuality from the 80′s where you paint objectors as bigots ? Isnt describing others as bigots inherently, implicity bigotted in itself as you dont know if all objectors are ‘bigoted’ or have legitimate, moral , medical and societal objections to homosexuality ? Congrats you’ve shot yourself in the foot without realising it.

        And marriage is not a right, you cant marry your dog – are we discriminating against those into beastiality, cant marry your sister – what about practicioners of incest. Cant marry your dead partner , are we discriminating against necrophiliciacs – and hey who are we to judge the mantra goes ?

        Sorry Travis , I’ve let rip with both barrels here but Im not out to hit you over the head despite the tone of reply. Just can’t agree with your take on things.
        Best wishes in spite of our differences. Hope you dont hold it against me.

        • Doug

          oops – should have clarified

          ‘Other people’s private business has resulted in a continent of orphans in Africa.’

          refers to the situation where the parents have died of AIDS, which as you all know is tragically commonplace in some African countries.

        • Travis

          Doug,

          I’m not offended in the slightest by the tone/content of your reply. In my view, it’s not impossible to glean some benefit from a good walloping every once in a while.  In truth, I read this article a few days ago when it was first posted, thought it was good and didn’t think much more about it until I saw  subsequent tweet or Facebook post from Campolo about a good discussion going on.  I revisited the page, saw Annie’s long entry and banged out a response.

          I’ve read your response to my own a couple of times and I I think you did a good job of taking me to task.  Additionally, I don’t have a problem admitting that my position is primarily one of gut instinct.  You described my argument as childish.  I’m guessing because you found it overly simple and composed of shoddy logic? Perhaps a fair comment. But now that you’ve addressed me, I’d like to revisit it.

          The article, as I understood it, was about legislative efforts which have previously gone on to prevent homosexuals from marrying.  I’ll quote Ian here:

          “The church ought to be immersed in the business of transforming lives through teaching, compassion and care, instead of treading in the shallow waters that have us trying to govern lives through legislative force.”

          You offered the example of abolishing slavery and under my argument, what gave the right of those darn pesky Northerners to meddle in the affairs of the South, right?  That sounds pretty good initially, but where I think it breaks down is that I think you’d be hard pressed to make an argument that slavery didn’t totally suck for the slaves and that they weren’t being oppressed. They were being hurt, directly…so a bunch of other people argued that we shouldn’t hurt them any longer and thankfully, for the slaves, the majority went their way.

          I can live with the idea that laws here in the U.S. get made by majority vote and there are plenty of places where gay marriage is not currently legal. I don’t agree with it, but that’s the system. I just don’t see how someone’s sexual orientation and the ability to define their relationship as ‘married’ under the law is hurting anyone?

          I can see how one could make an argument that Mr. Sandusky, to use a recent example, was ‘hurting’ those kids…so I’m fine with the rest of us infringing on his right to sodomize them.  But, I don’t need to believe in a particular view of God or his existence at all to exercise that kind of empathy.  That’s just human and decent. I favor laws which guard against harming others. But as I stated earlier, I don’t see how allowing two homosexuals to be legally married actually harms anyone?  I just think that currently, a lot of folks find it somehow repulsive, or ‘sinful’ or for whatever reasons, don’t approve of it.  Which isn’t the same as championing the prevention of obvious, actual harm.

          As far as my reference to ‘texts’ I was referring to the entirety of scripture, not just any particular references to homosexuality.  I’m saying that the world obviously doesn’t agree on what the Bible actually is, so I wouldn’t use it as my foundation to construct an argument, the endgame of which, is to restrict the rights of others. Just saying homosexuality is wrong cuz God says so isn’t enough when we’re talking about governing a country which is not yet a theocracy. It’s fine to teach one’s kids that, or get together and create a church, or religion who feels that way…hang out and do your own thing together, but if you’re gonna deny the benefits of legal status, via marriage, for people who’s only offense is that they feel attracted to their own gender, then ‘God says so’ just isn’t sufficient reason, in my view.

          It sounds as though you might be saying that AIDS is a gay thing, and the rest of us are somehow paying financially for their sinful acts? I also wasn’t clear on what you were saying about ‘victims’, and medical consequences? Were you arguing that teenage sex should be illegal because some teens make bad choices and the rest of us end up paying some prices for that via taxes? Feel free to elaborate on any of those…I wasn’t entirely clear what you were saying on any of them.

          Anyway, I’m rambling…and yet, I still feel like efforts to restrict gay marriage are rooted in some kind of prejudice. There’s lots of us who feel differently and one day, my prediction is that allowing it will become the law of the land. PEACE OUT.

    • CJo

      Hi Annie :) Thank you for your heartfelt post. You are loved. If you want to check out a community of online people who will love you (of course, there’s always a few smart alecs in the group) check out johnshore.com a Christian blogger/author who is 100% GLBT affirming. I think you’ll enjoy your journey there :) Be blessed my friend :)

    • christianinchina

      Annie, thank you for your honesty! A great deal of Christians I know could take a lesson from you (Including myself if I’m truly honest).

      In the light of how you posted, I think it’s fair I fess up. I’m straight and the idea of kissing another male repulses me (I imagine in much the same way as you were repulsed to sleep with a man.) However, I am by far free from sin. I have had relationships with girls which have been at times mostly sexual, and at times entirely. I have knowingly done what I clearly believe the Bible and Jesus teach me are wrong .

      I do believe homosexuality in itself is wrong. I also believe that lying, gossipping, cheating and doing anything to hurt other is wrong. I know that we are all sinners, in fact I’m probably the worst I’ve ever met. If Jesus’ death and His grace is enough for me, I know it is enough for any homosexual in any country in the world. As soon as I am 100% free from sinful desires, I will consider myself able to condemn you. I know that this will never happen.

      “God is love.” Fact. I know that He loves me, He loves you and He loves all members of the LGBT society.

      You send a peaceful message of love, others on this post are attacking you with this ‘turn or burn’ doctrine. I feel sure that anyone who condemns you, here or in your life needs themselves to be convicted for their animosity. THIS is the clear violation of God’s love, and to preach that homosexuals are evil is heresy. Well done for rising above this rubbish! Bless you and your kids.

    • Anonymous

      I empathize with your story.

  • http://twitter.com/qotbpaul Paul Charles

    Totally agree with your part about discipleship. Whatever it means to be a true disciple of Jesus, it has to mean that it is chosen and not forced. Whichever side of the debate you fall on, there is no doubt that legislation does not create disciples.

  • Doug

    “There is toleration for everybody who conforms to the fashion of the day; but no toleration for anyone who believes that the laws of heaven should regulate life on earth.”

    CH Spurgeon

  • http://jillriter.com Jill Riter

    “All of this isn’t to say that the church should give up on wrestling with the complexities of sexual orientation, nor is it to say that the church itself should perform gay marriage ceremonies. Those matters require far more than one blog post.”
    True.

    It would take an endorsement by God.  Once again, refer back to the Word:  

    http://bible.cc/2_timothy/3-16.htm
    http://bible.cc/jude/1-18.htm

  • Jess

    I don’t support gay marriage in the slightest, as it is a sin. Just like i don’t support murder, theft, pre marital sex etc. To put it clear, anything that God has stated in His bible to be against his law. 
    I do think there is a difference in being a sinner by nature and acting upon being a sinner. For example, if you think about hating someone and killing them. If you hate them then you are just a natural sinner, and we are all tempted by sin. But If you choose to kill them, then you acted on your sinful thoughts. The same goes for homosexuality. If you are attracted to them, then you are a natural sinner, tempted by Satan. But if you act on your desires then you are acting upon your sin, and giving into temptation. 

    You can’t truly have a relationship with God if you continue to do sinful acts. You have a true relationship with God and Jesus if you continue to pray to God and ask for forgiveness. But that doesn’t mean that you kill someone today, go to God and repent, and then go back to what you did all over again tomorrow. 
    Same goes for any other sin. you don’t do a homosexual act today, repent to God and ask for forgiveness, and then in 2 months time you are still doing the same thing with absolutely no improvement. I know it takes time to get out of a habit. But after a while there should be a little bit of improvement, like the way you think.. 
    Example: Today you think of “hey I’m attracted to them i’m gonna make the first move.” A week later “hmm i find them attractive, but i know it is wrong.. But i’ll act on it anyway.”
     That is still an improvement, because you recognise what you are doing is wrong. Give it time, and you will eventually stop what you are doing, and instead just be tempted by sin, and not act upon your desires, rather than the desires of our God. 

    The timing is really an individual thing. But after a certain amount of time, there should be at least some improvement to the way you think. 
    I know because when i finally had a relationship with Jesus and our heavenly God, my sinful acts slowly turned into just mere thoughts. It is still a sin to think of anything sinful, but that doesn’t mean you don’t have to repent, because you still do.
     Jesus himself was tempted by sin. 

    Matthew 4: 1-11Jesus Is Tested in the Wilderness 1 Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted[a] by the devil. 2 After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. 3 The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” 4 Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’[b]” 5 Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. 6 “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:   “‘He will command his angels concerning you, 
       and they will lift you up in their hands, 
       so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’[c]” 7 Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’[d]” 8 Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. 9“All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.” 10 Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’[e]” 11 Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.

    You shouldn’t just read the bible in one part and think it is ok. But read the whole bible and understand it word for word. and don’t just say “the bible contradicts itself,” etc. Because the bible doesn’t contradict itself. If you think it does, then go join a bible study group in a true Christian church and you will soon learn the bible in its entire truth. 

  • Doug

    Look at what happened in Mass when they legalised same sex marriage -

    http://www.massresistance.org/docs/marriage/effects_of_ssm.html

  • Michael Schmidtman

    Excuse me, I don’t remember seeing too many Christians with “clenched fists”.  If I’m missing them, I’m sorry, and I apologize for them on their behalf, but I HAVE seen militant homosexuals with clenched fists raised, faces contorted with anger, as they push their militant political agenda in a decidedly UN-Christian way.

    Just sayin’…

  • JSB

    Ian – simple question: Post the text reference from the Old or New Testament cannon where homosexuality is specifically supported and/or affirmed?

  • JSB

    Ian – simple question: Post the text reference from the Old or New Testament cannon where homosexuality is specifically supported and/or affirmed?

    • Brian

      Was discussing this with a friend a couple of years ago and he had an interesting thought.  If you took out all the verses in the bible that even have the possibility of referring to homosexuality and then ask yourself what does the bible say about marriage you still would never get the idea that marriage is ever between two men or two women.

  • Gailb14ever

    I challenge ALL christians to pick up a Strong’s concordance of the Bible and research those 6 verses, take it back to the original Greek and Hebrew language and try to find a way to connect those words to loving homosexual relationships,,, Do you know the word homosexual wasn’t even in the Bible until 1946? If you want to preach hate at least do your research!

    • Brian

      calling someone to repent is not preaching hate

  • Guest

    This should be a non-issue for supposed “Red Letter” Christians, as my
    Bible states in “Red Letters” a half dozen times No one who sins in this
    matter will go to heaven. We are called to Rebuke such behavior like
    any other “Sin” and if said behavior persists dis-associate from the
    party.   God’s answer to continued immoral behavior was given to Sodom and Gomorrah! Christ warned the churches in book of Revelations twice that no one practicing such acts will enter the Kingdom of Heaven .

  • Michael

    Splendid article, Ian.

    Keith Carr, if you would care to do some historical research, you would find that both in Corinth (where Paul was writing his letter) and Rome (where it was headed), there were prominent temples to the goddess Cybele.  Greeks and Romans were abandoning the invisible Deity taught by their own philosophers, and were worshiping Cybele instead, using idols of women, lions and serpents.

    Her male priests, the Galli, castrated themselves (what a penalty for their error!), dressed as women, and played the part of women in same-sex temple prostitution to honor the goddess.  Even the women likewise, who worshiped Cybele, dressed as men, were fitted with artificial phalli / dildos, and played the part of men in same-sex temple prostitution.

    That has NOTHING to do with two nice Chirstian boys, or two fine Christian girls, who love God, trust in Jesus, but who happen to fall in love with each other.  For you to apply Romans 1 to such believers is slander, something your anger leads you to commit.

    While we’re at it, 1 Cor. 6:9 was translated by Martin Luther, 500 years ago, as “child molesters”.  Evidence from Eusebius, Aristides, John the Faster, and others suggests that boy rape is what Paul is referring to.

    As you surely realize, Genesis 19 is an incident of sexual violence and gang rape, just as in the lamentable example of Judges 19, where the men of Gibeah raped a female prostitute all night until she died.  But Genesis 19 no more condemns all homosexuality, than Judges 19 condemns all heterosexuality.

    Oh, and as a Gentile Christian I’m not under the Jewish law of Leviticus.

    Listen, Keith — you seem full of your own opinions and probably have not bothered to meet any real, live, gay believers.  By your obstinate judgment you bear false witness against us and look down on our faith and love.

    150 years ago, you would have been one of the self-righteous folk who formed the Southern Baptist Convention because “the bible supports slavery”.  And in a sense they were correct about the written text.  Only, they totally failed to listen to God the Holy Spirit, who was trying to teach them something new (John 16:12-13).  Nowdays, all Christians realize that God went BEYOND the words of the bible and condemns slavery.  But some folk live out of their little boxes and can’t see the forest for the trees.

    I pray God brings you to repentance, and to a love for your gay and lesbian brothers and sisters.

    Michael

  • Ahall

    I agree legally as a country we should focus on “bigger problems” such as human traffiking  etc.  As a nation. However sin is sin disregardful of the large or small consequences.  I think as a Christian body we need to be careful about categorizing sin as worse than or better than.  Also the bible is our guidebook.  We have to believe that there was and is a purpose for God’s instruction to us. I believe that I am unworthy of HIS grace, but grateful to accept. The painful truth for many of us who LOVE people in many types of sin is that it is still sin.  We cannot cherry pick what to teach those seeking the Word of God. This issue tears my heart out and I wonder the wisdom.  There are REAL consequences to all sin.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve spent long, frustrating hours trying to make certain Christians understand why ‘love the sinner, hate the sin’ is a cruel, hateful way to approach me and my sexuality. Often, I have to end the conversation with ‘I can’t take your love, because I love myself too much to let you hurt me like that. Goodbye.’

    • Anonymous

       I don’t understand what you saying. Could you elaborate how how others have treated you with cruelty under the ‘love the sinner, hate the sin’ ideal?

  • sammyze

    I understand that we can’t hold the world to a Christian standard; however, as a society we do have to decide what is healthy for us as a whole and what is not. If I believe the bible teaches homosexuality is sin, then it follows that endorsing homosexual marriage is not good for our society. In California, from kindergarten to 12 grade, public schools can now teach our children @ bisexuality and homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. – not just in an informational way, but in the context that they are good valid life choices and must not be disagreed with. This is the problem with same sex marriage. There’s an agenda behind it.

  • Cindydtcw

    I am the devout Christian mother of a son who told me 18 months ago that he is gay.  To say I was shocked would be an understatement as I had absolutely NO idea.  I birthed this amazing young man.  I raised him.  I nurtured him.  I loved him.  How could I not have known?  He told me that he realized he was gay when he was in the 6th grade (he’s 20 now) and that he “prayed every day for God to not make it be true.”  I believe my child.  He also told me that it is not a choice; that he knows he was born this way and then he told me that he knows that God made him this way for a reason.  Wow!  Am I struggling with it?  You bet I am.  I love my son so very, very much.  I believe in him and I know that he is speaking the truth.  I pray about it every day.  I have had Christian counseling to help me come to terms with it and learn to embrace it as a part of who my son is.  One Pastor told me that he believes that it is not a choice.  That it’s like being born left handed vs. right handed.  My own Pastor was much harsher.  He told me there “would be people who would tell me it was ok but that it is not.”  I almost left the church I love because he made me feel like my son would not be welcomed there.  Yes, the bible says that homosexuality is a sin.  It also says the lying, cheating, over indulging (in anything) is a sin.  Why do Christians focus so much on homosexuality but ignore so many other sins?

  • walking in the light

    I have been a high school teacher for over 30 years. When a student walks into my classroom, that individual is my student and my calling is to be the teacher for that person, no matter what his/her background, religious (or not) belief, race, or economic situation. I hope that I am known as person of charity and goodness as I try to reflect the Savior. I also am a ladies’ leader in a conservative and caring Christian community of faith; I take very seriously Jesus’ call to righteousness and do not feel that I can mold the scriptures to me; I must mold myself to the scripture. SOOOOO, where am I going with this?

    For the last five years, the GLBT group in my school has singled me out for special attention.  This was unsought for and is unfair. Rumors have been spread about me among the student body and faculty. When I track down the sources, I get replies such as…We thought you were like… because you are a Christian. I have been called names in classrooms and on line:  bigoted homophobe, racial homophobe, and those are the ones decent enough to print.  When I came up for a promotion, “someone” went to the administration and said that I wasn’t able to treat all students fairly. I have been insulted in public about my faith by this group and their followers.

    Finally, a group of students came to my literal and figurative rescue by confronting the most egregious offenders.  Still, my professional life is damaged; a promotion is NOT going to be in my future.  But I pray every day that I may shine the light of love and the truth in whatever situation I find myself.

    This led me to  search the scriptures again.
    Is God concerned with the moral and ethical behavior of a nation?  The Old and New Testament confirm that He is. Jehovah wants His children to be aware of and actively promote justice for the poor and abused. Was he concerned about Hitler in Germany?  Andrew Jackson in the United States?  Kony in Africa? Mao in China?

    He also expects His children to  seek after righteousness.

    What BEHAVIOR is not acceptable? Jesus and Paul are very explicit concerning the path to salvation.  We are called to holiness which is a result of accepting the gift of salvation.  (established in Leviticus and reaffirmed in I Corinthians)  Jesus did not address homosexual behavior, but did He need to?  He upheld the teachings in the law. He explained the true heart of the law as the heart of God. We cannot put a stamp of approval on a behavior that God, IN SCRIPTURE, has not done so.  If it were OK, would not Jehovah have been very explicit in letting His children know?

    In my faith community, we believe that ALL have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. People seeking the Creator are welcome, and we teach the full counsel of God.  All of us have sin and behaviors that are not pleasing to the God of heaven.  The gospel is about change:  darkness to light.  The thief is to steal no longer.  The murderer is to kill no more. The liar is to tell the truth. The wayward father is to take care of his family.  And in the same vein, the homosexual/lesbian sexual practice is to stop.  Gays are welcome to work and worship with us as long as a person is seeking a path to redemption, and for each person the pace is different.

    There is a song that I caught a few lines from:  “If I have to change to get into heaven, I don’t want to go in.”  What a tragic and self-centered philosophy. Countless numbers  of people have given their bodies and lives as living sacrifices to serve God.  Salvation is about what God wants, not my wants or any other human’s. God and the kingdom come first, not my sex life. If my husband dies, I will lead a celibate life, which Paul said is a worthy life. He Created us beings of light, not animals unable to control our sexual nature.

    This is long; I have never put in print what has happened to me, but after reading many of these posts, I felt that there are some who need to hear the other side of the story.  There is no need to respond and try to “straighten me out.”  I will not be checking to see if anyone agrees or disagrees.

    Let all of us DEVOTE ourselves to fasting and prayer to determine the perfect and pleasing will of God.  Romans 12.

    Grace and peace.

  • Mveach72

    This is such a gross misrepresentation of Jesus Christ and what His Word says about homosexuality! He says it’s wrong so guess what, Its wrong! end of discussion!!!

    • Chuckles

      Chapter and verse? Please cite which passage in scripture has Jesus condemning homosexuality. I’ve been looking all over the gospels and have yet to find it.

  • Andrew Wilkerson

    If Jesus sat at a table full of sinners (e.g. tax collectors, prostitutes, thieves, murderers, maybe even a gay/lesbian/bisexual person) then how can we, as self-proclaimed (and, many times, self-righteous) Christians expect to do any less than our own Savior? Looking back I was extremely hateful of those who struggle with homosexuality, and that I probably would have helped them more if I would have just sat down and talked to them like normal people (from one broken person to another). Now, a little bit older, Jesus has taught me more about kindness than  I could have imagined. I just hope that if ever presented with the opportunity that I will show His love to the hurting and broken. Remembering that, I’m no better, or worse, than they are.

  • WWEsq

    The only..and I mean the ONLY part of this blog entry that makes any sense is the recognition that Christians ought to spend some time reflecting on the log in their own eyes.  We should approach this issue as we approach any others like it – with humbleness and humility, and awareness of our own sin, showing all others God’s unconditional love by showing them to the cross.

    But at the end of the day, the sin of man can still take each of us down the wide path to destruction.  I think the Church should love and forgive.  But I also believe that the Church is called to protect Godly values.  What good is the Church if it permits sinful practices to become the cultural norm such that more people find the wide path rather than the narrow way?  How are we showing love to our brothers and sisters by simply standing down, so that they no longer have a voice of purity to counteract the MANY voices of impurity in the world? (I’m not talking about the hate speech that too many professed Christians engage in – nothing is gained from such painful belittling, but rather our lesson is lost with it.)

    Curiosity is dangerous.  And no matter what your objections to the “slippery slope” argument may be, it is a truth.  It is a truth because we are fallible, tempted sinners.  Without God we cannot hope to fight temptation or be delivered from it.  There’s nothing wrong with lending a caring ear, showing love and comfort to those enduring trials and tribulations.  We ought to do these things.  But we should not seek it out.  When you’re faced with temptations you aren’t supposed to approach it with kindness and ‘healthy’ curiosity.  Run away from it.  And quickly.  When others you encounter are struggling with it, don’t cast them out, but lift them up.  Acknowledge the draw sin has on all of us.  If you step out onto a slope that is slippery it is impossible to stay where you are, not to mention getting back onto the safety of your non-slippery safe ground.  Why would the Church welcome that fall from God?  Why should the Church surrender the commission to share God’s word with the lost by simply letting them become more lost than they are.

    I apologize if I misunderstood your post, and I hope that I did.  I’m afraid to hear that any Christian would share a message with such dangerous ideas, as yours.

    • Jim

      Amen.

  • Joywhyatt

    Marriage is for Man and Woman created by God.  If ‘Man’ wants to marry ‘Man’ then ’Man’ should create another name for that union.  I will never say that’s wrong for anyone to love another person whether it be the same sex or not but don’t change the fabric of our lives and what our Marriages stand for.  I am blessed beyond measure what God has done in my marriage with my Husband and it’s like a glue that he has created and he has bonded us together to fight Satan every day and fight the battle of daily life together as Man and Wife.  We all need to fight Satan but don’t change what I fight for everyday and that’s my marriage because Satan knows that if my Marriage fails everything else in my life fails – he know’s it and tries to break it down at every waking moment! It’s a constant battle.

  • Anonymous

    This entire blog was profound, timely, and what I’ve been feeling about this hypocritical, UN-Christlike battle against homosexuality.
    I wonder what would be a result if we ‘win’ this war. What if Gay Marriage remained illegal/unrecognized? What would change? I say ‘nothing’. It’s been illegal for years up until now, yet the LGBT community still grew. The LGBT community still made noise and expanded their cultural impact. The LGBT community was still, in fact, the LGBT community. So preventing them from achieving civil union will not in turn prevent them from being gay. And, it SURELY won’t bring any member of the LGBT community closer to God. Has it done so thus far, in all the years Gay Marriage has been unrecognized? No. Instead, the LGBT community pursued this right to marry. They still lived a LGBT lifestyle. Gay Marriage will not make them ‘gayer’. They’re already gay….so in essence, the ‘war’ has already been lost. So these efforts to stifle gay rights are futile, and aren’t showing anyone Christ’s love. Honestly, this is exactly how the Pharisees operated in Jesus’ days on earth…by hypocritically enforcing the Law of religion with NO love, NO compassion, and NO recognition of Christ Who was standing right there in front of them.

    • JIm

      Christ was indeed full of love and compassion…. so much that he gave up his own life and died on the cross for all types of sin, even homosexuality. If you’ll read all of the teachings of Christ, you’ll find that he taught “repentance” from sin. Even though Christ never uttered the word “homosexual”, He referenced and upheld the destruction of Sodom (which was destroyed in Genesis 19, for wickedness that included homosexuality). Christ loves us enough to rescue us for sin… He didn’t die on the cross to leave us in it. Nothing in Scripture teaches that… NOTHING. All sin is destructive… ALL sin… homosexual sin, heterosexual sin, and non-sexual sin. None of these are condoned, accepted, petted, or allowed. From beginning to end, Scripture insists upon repentance and conversion from sin into righteousness.

  • Anonymous

    The true motive of this Anti-Gay movement, and any other movement that seeks to establish every single Biblical statute as U.S. Law, is to make living in the United States more comfortable for the Christian. It seeks to make everyone ACT like Christians so that we can operate without discomfort; we won’t have to work as hard to raise our kids amidst cultural morality, we won’t have to worry about seeing “Out” magazines crowding magazine stands, we won’t have to see gay couples strolling in the parks with rings on their fingers and adopted children, etc. This is for OUR comfort, not the expansion of God’s Kingdom and the proliferation of Christ’s love throughout society. Christ was routinely at odds with the Pharisees who, like today’s church, sought to uphold legalism rather than true piety and compassion. Like the Pharisees and the adulterous women, we’re dragging homosexuals into the court and proclaiming ‘STONE THEM, for we caught them being gay!’. I bet Christ would kneel down, scribble in the sand, and then say “He who is without sin cast the first stone”. Then we’d turn, one by one, and walk away…back to our prideful, selfish lives filled with epic adultery, materialism, fornication, divorce and illegitimate remarriage (Luke 16:18), and partiality…..for which we’ll turn and ask God for mercy.

  • Anonymous

    The true motive of this Anti-Gay movement, and any other movement that seeks to establish every single Biblical statute as U.S. Law, is to make living in the United States more comfortable for the Christian. It seeks to make everyone ACT like Christians so that we can operate without discomfort; we won’t have to work as hard to raise our kids amidst cultural morality, we won’t have to worry about seeing “Out” magazines crowding magazine stands, we won’t have to see gay couples strolling in the parks with rings on their fingers and adopted children, etc. This is for OUR comfort, not the expansion of God’s Kingdom and the proliferation of Christ’s love throughout society. Christ was routinely at odds with the Pharisees who, like today’s church, sought to uphold legalism rather than true piety and compassion. Like the Pharisees and the adulterous women, we’re dragging homosexuals into the court and proclaiming ‘STONE THEM, for we caught them being gay!’. I bet Christ would kneel down, scribble in the sand, and then say “He who is without sin cast the first stone”. Then we’d turn, one by one, and walk away…back to our prideful, selfish lives filled with epic adultery, materialism, fornication, divorce and illegitimate remarriage (Luke 16:18), and partiality…..for which we’ll turn and ask God for mercy.

    • Jim Hill

      Christ stated very clearly that he didn’t come to destroy the law, but to “fulfill the law”. He also mentioned and upheld the judgment and destruction of Sodom (which was destroyed because of desperate wickedness, namely homosexuality. The Pharisees were rebuked for being hypocrites and majoring on the minors. They were rebuked for exhalting themselves and debasing others… But the Bible, both Old and New Testaments openly forbid and condemn homosexuality, along with lust, adulter, murder, drunkeness and even envy… Yes we all sin, but NOWHERE in scripture is homosexuality or habitual sin of any kind condoned. Remember, Christ didn’t rebuke those men for criticizing adultery, he just prevented them from stoning her. When her accusers left, he said, “Neither do I comdemn thee”… but that’s not all he said, he told her to “GO AND SIN NO MORE”. Love and forgiveness isn’t a license to sin nor is it a prohibition on preaching or teaching Biblical truths about sin.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joey.kuharik Joey Kuharik

    i can believe that two people of the same sex could love one another in various ways, even to the agape. the only thing that im puzzled about is eros in that kind of a relationship. as a christian thats really where my only source of tension lies with that. i dont think that people, those of the gblt included should be subject to the bible being used as a type of club to beat them with. i guess that lifestyle is something i dont understand and probably cannot because i cant relate.many christians do not mean to be hurtful, we are going on the teachings whether right or wrong that have been passed on to us through the generations. and many of us do not know how to be accepting or empathetic of it because there was no such thing. im not a turn or burn sign holder, because its not my place to judge. all i can say is hopefully we learn from our ways and be more loving, forgiving, and accepting eventhough we may not understand the lifestyle and let the Love of God flow. and deal with things that are more important to the justice of God like ending sex slavery, violence, and inequality. i apologize to the gblt community for the christians not being more accepting, hopefully we one day we can overcome the errors of ways, th church is flawed because people are flawed, we are finite and imperfect people trying to serve an infinite and perfect God.

    • Jim

      My beliefs aren’t based on tradition or what has been handed down for generations… My beliefs are based upon Scripture, when I believe is the inspired, authorative Word of God. Cultures may evolve to uphold certain things, but I think you’ll find that neither God nor the truths in the Bible change.

  • Meg

    God would have made an Adam and Steve and an Adam and Eve if that’s what he wanted. Man and Man can’t have babies and Women and Women can’t. Hmm I wonder why they can’t? Obviously because it is a sin, just like lying, stealing, cheating, murdering, and so on. I’m a sinner, your a sinner. God hates sin and so should we. We are known by the fruit we bear, we need to turn away from our sin.

    • Justin

      I completely agree with you.

    • Chuckles

      So you’re saying God designed sex to only be used for procreation and not for pleasure?

      • Jim

        The Bible teaches that sex is for both, within marriage.., but it forbids homosexual and lesbian sex and only promotes marriage between heterosexuals. I know that’s unpopular and offensive to some, but I didn’t write the Bible. I just read it and believe it, and when my life and views don’t line up with it, I don’t try to change the Bible, I try to change my life and views according to Scripture.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kevi-Equality/100002106564260 Kevi Equality

    I am not a Christian but here goes. As a gay man, I felt there was no place for me in religious life, and I decided religion was nothing more than superstition in a gilded leather binding. However, through the years I continued to observe Passover. A few years back, during First Night Seder, I had a bit of an epiphany – I realized that faith = freedom – “Let My people go that they may worship Me!” The slave who believes G-d’s promise is already free, and in one way or another, we all live in some sort of bondage, we all have our Mitzrayim – the Hebrew name for Egypt that literally means ‘tight places,’ we all crave freedom, and we all need redemption. Long story short, I joined an LGBT synagogue in New York City. My synagogue often uses a quote, Psalm 118:22 – “Even ma’asu habonim hay’tah l’rosh pinah” – “The stone that the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone” – to reflect the special role that all marginalized people play in G-d’s scheme. We are here to teach love to a world sorely in need of healing. Being gay is a gift.

  • Janie

    I’m neither gay nor lesbian, but a logical heterosexual elderly female, but consider myself to be a Christian hoping to live a Christ-like life. I do have a quarrel with your statement that you don’t necessarily believe the church should participate in marriages. If a marriage is to celebrate and seal the vows of two people who love each other and wish to commit to a lifetime of loving each other…why not extend this blessing and celebration to gays and lesbians as well?

  • jeffreyprice

    At our places of work schools places of serving places of gentle words or places of scolding Jesus says come drink from the living water and go and sin no more. Scripture will reveal to us what that water is and what our sins are.

  • Robin

    As a born again Christian for 40 years, I’ve gone through many different judgements on homosexuality. At first, I was a fanatic, and judged everyone who didn’t believe just like me. But as I grew older, and lived through many of life’s troubles and heartaches and mistakes, I’ve gotten to the point where I feel I have no right to judge anyone. I know I have enough on my own plate to deal with, I don’t need to be sticking my finger in anyone elses pie! I also feel that God has done a pretty good job without my help and he’ll take care of everyone and decide what’s right and wrong. All I know, is that Jesus died for my sins, and everyone else who call on his name and that’s all that matters! He doesn’t turn anyone away, so I shouldn’t either.

    • Really

      So, it took you 40 years to understand Jesus’ words?

      • Yes, really.

        To “Really” – what does your response accomplish? Is it to belittle this person that is being honest about being wrong about something? Do you think Jesus cares that it “took them 40 years to understand his words”?

        Stop going around trying to make people feel bad. Especially when they’re being honest. Especially when they’re saying they were wrong about discriminating against a certain group of people.

        Get rid of your hypocrisy. Add something legitimate or helpful.

        • Noname

          The obnoxious tone of what “Really” said aside, I think the point is that it’s great that you can come around and realize that maybe you had some things wrong, but at the same time, that’s still 40 years of discrimination before you finally had a change of heart.

          That isn’t a judgment on you, and like I said, your turnaround is commendable. But it’s a little disheartening to hear that it takes some Christians 40+ years to realize that gays are people. Jesus might not care, but those of us on the receiving end of hate, bigotry, and/or discrimination certainly do.

    • Jim

      Robin, I hear alot of people say similar things like “I thought”, “I think”, “I feel”… but Paul, one of the most devout New Testament Christians ever, said that those who practice homosexuality (along with other sins like whoremongers, envy, drunkeness, and rebellion) are not saved, because they are still in bondage to sin, and are not going to be allowed into Heaven without repentance. That’s not how I feel, or what I think… It’s what Scripture says. Why are so many “Christians” feeling and reasoning things that go against the Word of God? We are taught as Christians to love ALL people. But we’re taught to love them enough to tell the truth, not to sit in silence and watch them perish in sin.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.richards.313 Joe Richards

    Since when does Christ’s Church — NOT AMERICA’s — ever SURRENDER to SIN?

    Black Bishop Encourages Christians to Leave Democratic Party

    A black Virginia bishop is calling for Christians to leave the Democratic Party over what he describes as a “cult-like devotion” to abortion and what he terms as a “rejection” of the traditional family.
    Bishop E.W. Jackson, a veteran of the Marine Corps and Harvard Law graduate, says the Democrats’ enslavement of some Americans, most notably black Americans, is the modern day equivalent of slavery and his focus is to lead an exodus, similar to what Moses did in the Old Testament.

    “Let God’s people go,” Jackson told The Christian Post in a telephone interview.

    “Clearly, the Democratic Party is the anti-Christian Party in this nation. They reject the Bible, what Bible-believing Christians embrace and they encourage the growth of what we can a ‘non-traditional’ family. That is morally wrong and a disgrace to our nation and our Lord,” said Jackson.

    Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/black-bishop-encourages-christians-to-leave-democratic-party-79691/#ieXiHOMqOltfckdS.99

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.richards.313 Joe Richards

    “All are welcome.” Is that true? If so, there would be no historical pericopes in Scripture of God’s people putting chronic practitioners of sin out of the camp, the fellowship, or the church. The classic example from Scripture is NOT the admonition to put out a homosexual, a thief, a blasphemer nor even a serial murderer, but a heterosexual putative brother in the Lord.

    1It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife. 2And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this? 3Even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present. 4When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, 5hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful naturea may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord.

    6Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast works through the whole batch of dough? 7Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. 8Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with bread without yeast, the bread of sincerity and truth.

    9I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— 10not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.

    12What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked man from among you.”b 1 Cor 5:1-13

    What MUST we learn from this? First, the person to be excommunicated was heterosexual — against such sexual orientation there is NO Scriptural proscription. But still Saint Paul, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, admonishes the church to put out this man who has his father’s wife. That’s sin. A sin that Paul says “does not occur even among pagans” (no doubt a little hyperbole because it is virtually certain that this was NOT the first instance in human history of this variant of heterosexual sin occurring).

    I will proceed from this point under the faith understanding that there is no hierarchy of sins such that some sins are permitted indefinitely and others are not tolerated when committed as a lifestyle.

    Continuing, Paul makes clear he is NOT admonishing the believers in Corinth to completely disassociate themselves from sexually immoral people who are NOT professing believers and part of the church. “BUT,” Paul continues, “now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who CALLS HIMSELF A BROTHER but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.”

    So, Paul makes an important distinction consistent with “Be IN the world but NOT of it.” Eat and drink outside the household of faith with virtually every type of sexually immoral or greedy person, idiolater or slanderer, drunkard or swindler, BUT if s/he wishes to REPENT, BELIEVE and become an adopted son or daughter of God through Christ and be covered by the Church, s/he must repent of her chronic practiced sins, or risk being excommunicated.

    Hence, what used to be a question with an obvious answer MUST be asked because Christians of the last couple decades have questioned the myriad millennium wisdom of God that sodomy is sin.

    Is sodomy and “women lying with other women” STILL sin? Has God floated down a blanket within which men are lying with men and women lying with women, accompanied by the voice of God Who told the Church,

    “Arise. Eat. Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
    Has this happened three times, with the sheet being immediately taken back to heaven?

    Asked another way, “Is there any indication from Scripture that God changed His mind and repented, making the sin of ANY AND ALL FORMS OF SEXUAL IMMORALITY no longer sin?

    If so, please offer me the pericope. If not, why should anyone make the argument that the church should directly or indirectly solemnize sodomy and welcome lifestyle sin into the church once those engaged in the lifestyle sin have professed Christ as their Lord and Savior and agreed to repent of all other sins save this sodomic one?

    Next arises the issue of “identity.” Homosexuals are wont to argue that their homosexuality is an integral part of their identity; it is somehow ingrained and woven within the very fabric of their being. That they can no more divest themselves of their homosexual identity as morph into a two headed kangaroo.

    At best this is a careless anthropomorphic sin; at worst a Theopocentric theological heresy. Any True theology yields a view of “identity” as primarily a dichotomy between Kingdom of God orphan status vs Adopted Son or Daughter status; and is much more forensic and volitional followed by holy behavioral than sexual followed by unholy behavior.

    Put another way God offers no evidence that He identifies us primarily according to our sexual predilections, choices and behaviors but based upon whether HE adopted us into His household of faith, or not.

    In a Christian Theopocentric eternal worldview our True identity is no more about what vocation we choose or the bedfellows we keep than a fish’s identity is predicated upon which tree it lives in. We are either IN CHRIST or we are NOT!

    Finally, Scripture supports the notion that the Church welcome SEEKING homosexuals, just as it welcomes SEEKING adulterers, thieves, liars, cheaters, tax evaders, coveters, and Sabbath breakers. But at some point in their faith journey, it must be reasonably concluded that if ANY of these SEEKERS wish to SEEK the risen Christ as their Lord and Savior, requiring their faith, repentance, and obedience, someone NOT FEARFUL of ANY SIN must emerge and tell them,

    “No one believes you will never fall into temptation again. Still, every temptation is accompanied by the Power of God to overcome it and remain free from sin. The Church welcomes your presence but your NEW IDENTITY in Christ requires that you repent of (forsake) deliberatively practiced sins, whether they be chronic sins of theft, lying, selfishness, greed, Sabbath breaking, heterosexual or homosexual sins. WE will NOT solemnize nor wed you to any of them. If you wish to remain in our ‘eklesia’ you must forsake them, otherwise we have been instructed by God to ‘Expel the wicked wo/man among us.’”

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.richards.313 Joe Richards

    One of the truly consternation producing curios I find within the predominantly left-leaning, Democratic party wing of the Church is the frequent reference to Jesus’ teaching on planks and specks in our eyes.

    Upon close examination I am amazed that it is virtually ONLY used in the context of Christian to non-Christian, but rarely in the context of Christian to Christian.

    Stated another way the implication is that Christians talking to non-Christians have a much bigger beam in their eye that should be removed than the non-Christian who has a mere speck. And by further implication Christians shouldn’t reach for that “speck” in the non-Christian’s eye because they have NOT removed the beam in their own.

    If Christians have already had a full bath and are cleansed in the blood of Christ and therefore only need an occasional foot-washing, which is NOT true for those outside the household of faith, why all the umbrage over Christians calling non-Christians to remove the beams in their eyes?

    And among the household of faith is there any reason to suppose that Christians should NOT be reaching for the remaining specks in our brothers/sisters eyes?

    I believe not.

    • Jim

      Brother, cut to the chase… I have a minor in English, an undergraduate and graduate degree in Biblical studies, and even I had trouble sifting through that lecture. You might want to dumb it up a little bit, if you want people to understand what you’re saying. Haha I THINK I agreed with you, but without a dictionary, I’m not entirely sure! :-)

  • David

    This is a lazy, cowardly argument, and one that I get tired of hearing. The first paragraph ducks the crux of the issue, which to me then makes the rest of the post pointless. That and it’s full of a lot of faulty assumptions, many of which would require a lot of hard evidence, or at the very least some clarification.

  • LGBTPersonOfFaith

    I have read several of posts on this article and one simple
    thing continues to resonate throughout them.
    Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe “love the sinner and hate the
    sing” sums it up pretty well.

    That is all well and good in response to
    say perhaps, lying. Love the liar, hate the lies? But really, how many
    people do you know call or truly consider themselves to be liars? And if
    they do, “liar” has so many negative connotations – I’d wager you’d
    rarely find someone considering themselves a liar as part of who they
    fundamentally are.

    You must understand that as a member of the LGBT community (and I
    will speak for myself, though I have an inkling there are many others
    like me), when you say “love the person, but hate the homosexuality,”
    you should be aware that there is no distinction in my mind between the
    two. I am pansexual – it is who I am. It is as innate in me as being a
    woman, or as being 5 foot 4 inches tall. For you to say that you love me, but hate my homosexuality is for
    you to say (in my hearing) that you hate who I innately am.

    Whether or not you believe
    that my attraction to a man, a woman, or anyone else is an innate part
    of who I am (which I’m sure if you consider who you are attracted to
    it’s probably a given that it’s an innate part of who you are), doesn’t
    matter – the way I interpret that phrase (as the individual you are
    trying to “love”) is what matters matters.

    I say this to you and anyone
    else who reads this to open up your mind to the fact that I (and I would
    assume) many others in the LGBT community (whom you are trying to reach
    and to show love) take that statement and others like it offensively.
    Just something to keep in mind as you try to actively love those in the
    LGBT community.

    And really, would you want to sit in church next to someone who if
    they really knew who you were would “love” you but hate your
    relationship with the love of your life, the world you’ve built
    together, the children you have together and consider it all vulgar and
    morally wrong just because you’re both women? And we wonder why the LGBT
    community is so hostile toward the church – I can assure you as having been
    raised in the church and as someone who regularly attends church;
    somedays it literally takes every ounce of grace and patience to sit an
    listen to catch phrases like “love the sinner, hate the sin.”

    In regard to the article, honestly it blows my mind. Why should any
    of you even care if I can get married to the person I love? Does my
    marriage all the way in New England make any difference to you living
    perhaps half way across the country? Does the fact that I can marry a
    woman and receive the same rights and the same benefits you get
    automatically when you marry a man really offend you so much that you
    would deny me the same happiness that you’ve experienced in your own
    marriages? Regardless of whether or not you feel it’s right or wrong,
    why would you want to deny the legal rights and privileges to me that
    you automatically receive when you marry the person you love? Why should you receive special benefits like tax breaks, spousal benefits, and the like (over 2,000 if I am correct) just because you marry someone of the opposite sex? If marriage is so sacred and purely a “man, woman, & God thing,” then get rid of all the extra legal rights and privileges provided by the government and stick to strictly religious ceremonies. I just want to be treated fairly – same as you. I don’t need my marriage to be at your church if you don’t want me there. But I do want to be treated the same way you are treated – my relationship validated and respected the way yours is.

    As both a member of the LGBT community and a follower of Christ I
    really think the church is behind the times on this one. You’d think
    we’d learn – look at practically ALL of church history. We’re almost
    always behind the times and a lot of times not only are we behind the
    times, but we’re also the ones that make things worse. You’d think we’d
    learn.

    I just have hope that the journey I’ve been on to come to the
    conclusions and comfort with who I am in Christ and my sexuality is a
    journey that others around me (not necessarily you who read this post),
    the people who really know me can travel on as well. Faith is an
    ever-evolving relationship.

    One final question for those of you who totally disagree with
    everything I’ve said and everything I am – how many LGBT people do you
    know? How many LGBT people of faith do you know? Your answer will
    probably be very telling as to why you are so against me loving someone
    else and wanting to publicly express my love and have it validated the
    same as yours or anyone else…

    • somerandomguy

      If being gay is the only facet that has been carved to make yourself you, then you have many more cuts to be made until you are a beautiful person. It’s silly to believe that identifying yourself within the LGBT is the sole part of you that you associate yourself with. If you recognized that you are also incredibly articulate ( probably educated, among other positive qualities and traits I am sure), then why should you be identifying yourself so strongly to your LGBT identity. There is nothing inherently wrong with identifying, but in doing so you have narrowed your world view by a large margin. “Love the sinner, hate the sin” would only be a bother if the so called “sin” was the largest facet in ones life that they identity is completely described by it.

      • somerandomguywhocallsoutidiots

        You’re an idiot.

      • Swifty

        My partner of the past 6.5 years is the most important thing in my life. If, as part of the fight for marriage equality, I have to publicly stand up with him and announce that we’re gay, then so be it. The only reason it seems like such a large part of who we are is because of bigots like you that want to oppress us and call us “sinful”, due to the necessary to raise awareness to fight the oppression. If you’d give us the rights we deserve, we would blend into the background. Until then, we have to be loud about it, and fight for the rights we have so long deserved.

        • Jim

          Swifty? If people call a sin “sinful” based on Biblical teachings that we hold as “truths”, are people calling it “sin” or is the Bible calling it “sin”?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Willow-Gallagher/184906494 Willow Gallagher

        Everyone has a facet of themselves that they focus on as most important to them. For some people it’s their cultural heritage or religious beliefs, for others it’s their family or their job, and for some it’s being LGBT. Finding an identity in such a facet isn’t a bad thing, the facet is a seed to help us focus so we can grow as a person. My identity as an LGBT person is my core, it helped me grow & find both friends and self confidence. Because I found it I was able to figure out what I wanted to do with my life, go to college & eventually get into seminary. I have gone places & made connections that I’ve never dreamed of, I’ve even found my own way to improve my little corner of the world. If anything my LGBT identity widened my world view considerably, I can’t count how much I’ve learned & done because of it, if I hadn’t I would have stayed in a corner & gone nowhere. When you look at it that way the love the sinner hate the sin bit becomes a very big bother, it makes a problem out of something that has been the single biggest source of good in my life & given me a much better life than I might have otherwise had.

        • Jim

          Willow, that “facet” and “identity” might be good… might be bad, depending on your beliefs. I value Scripture when I form my beliefs. I believe the Bible is “truth without any mixture of error”. What puzzles me about all this, is why people who claim Christianity and claim to hold Biblical beliefs would have “indentities” for “facets” that contradict clear (not vague) Biblical teachings? If you want to be Christian, be Christian. If you want to be LBGT, be LBGT, but the Bible doesn’t allow us to be both according to both the Old and New Testaments.

    • Donald Carter

      Pansexual? What a bullshit term. No respect for this drivel.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Willow-Gallagher/184906494 Willow Gallagher

        It might not be broadly used but that doesn’t mean it’s bs, it only seems so to you because you lack a sufficiently broad understanding of the variations of human sexuality. There are people in this world who fall outside typical definitions of male & female, pansexuality covers an attraction to these folks as well as folks who fit those standard definitions.

    • Jim

      I may one of few Christians who believe that homosexuality may POSSIBLY be “innate”, but I still believe that it’s sin, again because of Scripture. The Bible teaches through Romans that we’re all born with a sinful nature and in need of salvation. Whether a person is inclined to homosexuality, heterosexuality, violence, addiction, or whatever.. The Bible teaches that “all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God”. The Bible also teaches repentance of sin, not acceptance of sin. The New Testament teaches clearly that we much repent, believe in Christ, and be converted by faith in Him. There are no special licences for homosexuality, heterosexuality, hate, murder, or any other sin. The Apostle Paul wrote that those who practice any number of sins (including “homosexuality” will not enter into Heaven. Don’t assume that people who warn you of Biblical Truth, hate you.

      • Jim

        On more point on “Forbidding to Marry”. Since the beginning of creation in Genesis, God ordained that marriage was between male and female, husband and wife. GOD forbids homosexuality (and therefore homosexual marriage) throughout scriptures.

        Now.. The reference to “forbidding to marry” spoke of heterosexuals who ignored marriage and shacked up as if it were ok. Again you’re right that the Bible speaks of and condemns heterosexual sin… It also speaks of and condemns all homosexuality. The Bible permits sex in marriage, but nowhere… NOWHERE in the pages of Scripture, did God or any Biblical write allow for “homosexual marriage”… NOWHERE. Homosexuality is condemned, destroyed, and forbidden from Genesis to Jude… And God’s judgment of ALL sin is evident from Genesis to Revelation… ALL sin… Homosexual, heterosexual, and non-sexual.

        • Corey

          God ordained that marriage was between male and female……WRONG: God NEVER mentions marriage, however:
          When Same-Sex Marriage Was A Christian Rite’: [Excerpts] “Contrary to myth, Christianity’s concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual.” ,…, “Records of Christian same sex unions have been discovered in such diverse archives as those in the Vatican, in St. Petersburg, in Paris, in Istanbul and in the Sinai, covering a thousand-years from the 8th to the 18th century.” ,…, “While homosexuality was technically illegal from late Roman times, homophobic writings didn’t appear in Western Europe until the late 14th century. Even then, church-consecrated same sex unions continued to take place.” ,…, “Prof. Boswell’s academic study is so well researched and documented that it poses fundamental questions for both modern church leaders and heterosexual Christians about their own modern attitudes towards homosexuality. For the Church to ignore the evidence in its own archives would be cowardly and deceptive. The evidence convincingly shows that what the modern church claims has always been its unchanging attitude towards homosexuality is, in fact, nothing of the sort. It proves that for the last two millennia, in parish churches and cathedrals throughout Christendom, from Ireland to Istanbul and even in the heart of Rome itself, homosexual relationships were accepted as valid expressions of a God-given love and committment to another person, a love that could be celebrated, honored and blessed, through the Eucharist in the name of, and in the presence of, Jesus Christ.” (http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/whensamesexmarriagewasachristianrite.html)

  • http://twitter.com/TheBedKeeper Brian Anthony Bowen

    Wait till the Church finds out the Apostle Paul ordained same sex marriage!

    Turning to 1 Corinthians 7:

    1 Now as to the matters of which you wrote me. It is well [and by that I mean advantageous, expedient, profitable, and wholesome] for a man not to touch a woman [to cohabit with her] but to remain unmarried.

    Notice the people Paul is addressing here are UNMARRIED. As we’ll see through verse 7, they are clearly HETEROSEXUAL people he is addressing:

    2 But because of the temptation to impurity and to avoid immorality, let each [man] have his own wife and let each [woman] have her own husband.

    3 The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights (goodwill, kindness, and what is due her as his wife), and likewise the wife to her husband.

    4 For the wife does not have [exclusive] authority and control over her own body, but the husband [has his rights]; likewise also the husband does not have [exclusive] authority and control over his body, but the wife [has her rights].

    5 Do not refuse and deprive and defraud each other [of your due marital rights], except perhaps by mutual consent for a time, so that you may devote yourselves unhindered to prayer. But afterwards resume marital relations, lest Satan tempt you [to sin] through your lack of restraint of sexual desire.

    6 But I am saying this more as a matter of permission and concession, not as a command or regulation.

    7 I wish that all men were like I myself am [in this matter of self-control]. But each has his own special gift from God, one of this kind and one of another.

    Paul now ordains marriage for a second group of UNMARRIED people:

    8 But to the unmarried people and to the widows, I declare that it is well (good, advantageous, expedient, and wholesome) for them to remain [single] even as I do.

    9 But if they have not self-control (restraint of their passions), they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame [with passion and tortured continually with ungratified desire].
    If the 2nd group of people Paul addressed in verses 8-9 were heterosexual, they would have been included in the 1st group.
    Many people respond to this by saying the 1st group of people Paul addressed were already married. Verse 1 (above) and now verse 10 (below) prove that Paul doesn’t address MARRIED people until this point in his letter.

    10 But to the married people I give charge–not I but the Lord–that the wife is not to separate from her husband.

    Many people respond to this by saying the Apostle Paul only ordained marriage for UNMARRIED NON-HETEROSEXUAL people in the Church at Corinth, but in verse 17 below, Paul says, “This is my order in ALL the churches.”

    11 But if she does [separate from and divorce him], let her remain single or else be reconciled to her husband. And [I charge] the husband [also] that he should not put away or divorce his wife.

    12 To the rest I declare–I, not the Lord [for Jesus did not discuss this]–that if any brother has a wife who does not believe [in Christ] and she consents to live with him, he should not leave or divorce her.

    13 And if any woman has an unbelieving husband and he consents to live with her, she should not leave or divorce him.

    14 For the unbelieving husband is set apart (separated, withdrawn from heathen contamination, and affiliated with the Christian people) by union with his consecrated (set-apart) wife, and the unbelieving wife is set apart and separated through union with her consecrated husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean (unblessed heathen, outside the Christian covenant), but as it is they are prepared for God [pure and clean].

    15 But if the unbelieving partner [actually] leaves, let him do so; in such [cases the remaining] brother or sister is not morally bound. But God has called us to peace.

    16 For, wife, how can you be sure of converting and saving your husband? Husband, how can you be sure of converting and saving your wife?

    17 Only, let each one [seek to conduct himself and regulate his affairs so as to] lead the life which the Lord has allotted and imparted to him and to which God has invited and summoned him. This is my order in all the churches.

    Many people say we should not listen to Paul’s teaching because he supported slavery. Not true:

    21 Were you a slave when you were called? Do not let that trouble you. Butif you are able to gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity.

    22 For he who as a slave was summoned in [to union with] the Lord is a freedman of the Lord, just so he who was free when he was called is a bond servant of Christ (the Messiah).

    23 You were bought with a price [purchased with a preciousness and paid for by Christ]; then do not yield yourselves up to become slaves to men [but consider yourselves slaves to Christ].
    Many people say we should not listen to Paul because he would have supported ex-gay converstion therapy. Not true:

    24 So, brethren, in whatever station or state or condition of life each one was when he was called, there let him continue with and close to God.

    Many people say we should not listen to Paul because he would have told LGBT people to commit to lives of celibacy. Not true:

    37 But whoever is firmly established in his heart [strong in mind and purpose], not being forced by necessity but having control over his own will and desire, and has resolved this in his heart to keep his own virginity, he is doing well.

    Many people say that verses 8-9 above spoke of widows (women whose husbands had passed away). Actually, it’s a reference to Isaiah 54 wherein God refers to single barren women as “widowhood.” Paul doesn’t speak of women whose husband have passed away until this point:

    39 A wife is bound to her husband by law as long as he lives. If the husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she will, only [provided that he too is] in the Lord.

    40 But in my opinion [a widow] is happier (more blessed and to be envied) if she does not remarry. And also I think I have the Spirit of God.
    If Paul meant to define “widows” in verse 8 as simply “women whose husbands had passed away” he would not once again address them in verse 39-40.

    Turning now to 1 Timothy 4:1-3

    1 The Holy Spirit distinctly and expressly declares that in latter times
    some will turn away from the faith,

    giving attention to deluding and seducing spirits

    and doctrines that demons teach,

    2 Through the hypocrisy and pretensions of liars
    whose consciences are seared (cauterized),

    3 Who forbid people to marry…

    Who is being forbid to marry today?

    At no time in human history have each specific element of this prophecy been fulfilled as we see it in the gay marriage debate today.

    Some say the Gnotics. While the Gnostic Christians of Paul’s day indeed forbid some people to marry, we see the Holy Spirit specifies “in latter times” in verse 1. That would rule out the Gnostics.

    Some say the Catholic Church policy on celibacy for priests. While the Catholic Church indeed requires priests to take vows of celibacy, the priests do so by their own choice. Nobody is “forced” into the priesthood. This follows Paul’s own teaching that unmarried men can better focus on serving the Church, without being constrained to also tend to pratical aspects of married life. Clearly the Church is within the teaching of Paul in this regard, and the priests who so choose to enter the priesthood follow Paul’s teaching to do so only as they have personally resolved in their own heart. This would rule out the Catholic Church’s teaching on priests.

    Who is doing the forbidding?

    We see the Holy Spirit goes on to say those who forbid people to marry in the latter times would do so through “hypocrisy and pretensions of liars whose consciences are seared.” The 2012 Presidential GOP lineup shows this prophecy fulfilled in stark detail, as one candidate who had been divorced and remarried 3 times was actually being considered over candidates who support marriage equality.

    We see this prophecy being fulfilled in precise detail as amendments have been added to ballots across the country designed specifically to “forbid people to marry.”

    They are largely supported by those who call themselves Christians, who not only disregard Paul’s ordination of gay marriage (or as Paul said, had fallen away from the faith), but also through their very own hypocrisy and pretense, (as manifested in the skyrocketing divorce rate and rampant adultery among heterosexual couples in our modern age). They also continue to disregard the Holy Spirit’s warning against such and (as we see defined in 1 Timothy 4:1-3) have been “seduced by doctrines demons teach.”

    For a theologically thorough examination of these findings, please review: “Chapter 2: God Ordained Gay Marriage” and please send this post to everyone you know, whether they support gay marriage, or whether they forbid people to marry.

    The only way to prick the conscience of a professed Christian is with the very Scriptures upon which their conscience is based.
    If they still oppose gay marriage after reading this, we can only pray that God have mercy upon their soul.

    • Jim

      Your use of Scripture is out of context and grossly heretical… I know that sounds harsh, but I hope to be clear and help you to understand my statement. #1, in 1 Co 7, Paul never mentioned homosexuality… he was speaking of avoiding heterosexual lusts, and condoning hetersexual marriage. There is NOTHING remotely visible in scripture to suggest differently. Paul never, EVER condoned homosexuality or homosexual marriage. In fact, Paul stated specifically “that those who practice such things (he named homosexuality, transvestitism, adultery, envy & drunkeness) will not inherit the kingdom of Heaven”. (1 Corinthians 6:9) Therefore any statement identifying Paul or Scripture as “pro-gay” is not only dishonest, it is heresy.

  • http://twitter.com/ItsMyFootprint Its My Footprint

    I have just a few points:

    1) Homosexuality
    is not something new. It was there long back in the Bible times.

    2) There
    are many sins that are legal, but Christians do not fight to have them turned
    into criminal acts. The world has its own system. The kingdom of God has its
    own. As a Christian how would you feel if the government says every sin is now
    a crime? How many sins do you commit each day?

    3) That’s
    why Jesus said ‘He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at
    her’ (John8:7). Let’s judge ourselves first before we judge others.

    4) God is love. Love covers
    a multitude of sins. Jesus love everyone and died for all.

    • Jim

      You’re right… homosexuality as been around a long time… from way back in Biblical times… as early as Genesis 19… but every time the Bible mentions homosexuality, it defines it as either an “abomination” or “sin”. That rings true throughout the Old and New Testament. Christ even mentioned and upheld the judgment of Sodom. Whether or not sin is legal or illegal, it’s still “sin”. No sin is OKAY according to Scripture. Not homosexual sin, heterosexual sin, or any sin… Jesus loved and died for us all… to RESCUE US FROM SIN. Not to give us a license to continue in it.

      • Jim

        One more note… In the “casting stone” story, a woman was caught in the “very act” of adultery. A crowd of men gathered not to criticize her, not to decide if she was sinful or not, not to debate the merits of her sexuality, but to STONE HER TO DEATH. Jesus didn’t say, don’t tell the truth about what the Bible says. He kneeled down and wrote something in the sand… When I see him in person, one day, I can’t wait to ask him what it was! Was it a list of other sins that the others were guilty of? Was it a list of names in the crowd that were guilty of the same sin? He said, “Let him that is without sin, cast the first stone”. The crowd disbursed. He didn’t tell the woman her sin was ok, though. He didn’t tell her to embrace her sexual desires as an important part of who she was. He told her very plainly, “Go and sin no more”.

  • Anonymous

    This is my own personal story of the psychological and emotional impact that church placed upon my dad. Immediately after coming out to my family, my father was told that it was his fault that I am gay. They said he was distant, and likely unloving. It’s a ridiculous claim, in light of my life, that my dad made me gay, but because the Church convinced him it to be true, he has battled some serious emotional demons ever since.
    http://registeredrunaways.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/forgive-them-father/
    We need to have a larger conversation about this.

    • Jim

      As a Christian, I oppose homosexuality, but I’m ashamed of that type of unwarranted hypocrisy and judgmentalism against your Father. We are each responsible for our own choices and behavior.

  • thomasjeffreeson

    WE must make an effort to evolve as a society/species. While technologically we have spurned the most highly complex of challenges, some how we are still confounded by the fundimental process of intercommunications. Instead of trying to understand the other’s point of view, forget about respecting it, we oppose it with a seething viciousness. In this regard, we have not evolved beyond the Dark Ages in the timeline of mankind. But we have turned our controversy into a sporting event for which there is no beginning or end. It perpetuates by our lust for our own egotistical regard, shaped by those who agree and amplified by those who do not.

    To evolve we must make a conscious effort to first understand the other’s position before we speak. We must understand them fully and without prejudice if ever hoped our opinion is to be heard by them. Otherwise, they will not consider our words, but instead they will reject what we have to say without hearing a single word. To evolve as a species should be at the top of our list of things to do.

    • Peacemaker

      God defined himself as “I am the I am”, meaning “I am always the same”. He does not evolve, according to Scripture. Moving our society to accept homosexuality isn’t evolution. It’s reverse-evolution back to the godless days of Genesis 19.

  • Anonymous

    It looks like christians in the USA are going to have to decide if the name they carry is religious or political. Just so christians know, right now it’s political. You may not agree, but you can’t change that by just disagreeing. You have to act. A prolonged vehement pro-gay marriage crusade is about the only thing that will re-brand the term “christian” back to religious from political. That and a crusade to fight for voting equality.

  • Anonymous

    It looks like christians in the USA are going to have to decide if the name they carry is religious or political. Just so christians know, right now it’s political. You may not agree, but you can’t change that by just disagreeing. You have to act. A prolonged vehement pro-gay marriage crusade is about the only thing that will re-brand the term “christian” back to religious from political. That and a crusade to fight for voting equality.

  • Andrew

    I was a Christian at one point. I have known I was transgender from my first memories and went all through school pretending I was just a kid who didn’t want to fit into gender roles. I was a leader at my Christian high school, I was a worship leader at my church, I mentored people and helped them become closer to God. Then there came a day where I just couldn’t do it anymore, I couldn’t hide. After years of counseling, praying to be made normal and even trying healing and deliverance ministries, I came to the conclusion that there had to be a reason that God wouldn’t heal me. But the way I am treated by “Christians” was enough to drive me away from God and the church entirely. You can “hate the sin but not the sinner” all you want, but it only makes us feel like shit. I chose to be transgender as much as someone chooses to be cisgender and that is something that you christians will NEVER understand. This wasn’t a choice. Given a choice I would just be normal, but I can’t. Living a lie is enough to drive me to suicide. You christians don’t understand persecution until you’ve been in our shoes.

    • Jim

      Really? Looks to me like Homosexuality is celebrated more and openly accepted more than ever before in our Country and maybe our world’s history. And it looks to me like Bible-believing Christians are more and more openly rejected and prohibited from praying openly and expressing Biblical views more now than at any other time in our history…

      I’m sorry for your personal struggle, but It’s not “Christians” who defined homosexuality as sin. It has been recognized as sin by almost every culture since the beginning of humanity. I don’t decide what’s sin and what’s not. I believe Scripture defines that… and multiple passages in the old and new testament define homosexuality (and most heterosexuality: eg lust, adultery, fornication) as “sin”.

      Friend, you can’t help what you feel. We’re all tempted with different things. But you are responsible for the choices you make, no matter what your temptations are. So am I. We all struggle with sin, but that doesn’t negate sin in Scripture and it doesn’t remove our personal responsiblity to God. Praying you find a peace that passes all understanding.

      • Travis

        Really, Jim? Please respond with more compassion! Andrew is hurting. Can you just stop mentioning sin for a second and just be there for someone? Please????? This is doing IRREPARABLE harm to the church and its relationship to the world. LGBT should feel loved and accepted. Do you really think Andrew hasn’t heard everything you just said a zillion times? Just BE THERE FOR HIM.

    • Jekell

      To be completley blunt sin makes people feel like shit. You will never be happy living in sin and enmity with the one true living God.

  • Andrew

    I was a Christian at one point. I have known I was transgender from my first memories and went all through school pretending I was just a kid who didn’t want to fit into gender roles. I was a leader at my Christian high school, I was a worship leader at my church, I mentored people and helped them become closer to God. Then there came a day where I just couldn’t do it anymore, I couldn’t hide. After years of counseling, praying to be made normal and even trying healing and deliverance ministries, I came to the conclusion that there had to be a reason that God wouldn’t heal me. But the way I am treated by “Christians” was enough to drive me away from God and the church entirely. You can “hate the sin but not the sinner” all you want, but it only makes us feel like shit. I chose to be transgender as much as someone chooses to be cisgender and that is something that you christians will NEVER understand. This wasn’t a choice. Given a choice I would just be normal, but I can’t. Living a lie is enough to drive me to suicide. You christians don’t understand persecution until you’ve been in our shoes.

  • timeforchange

    Thanks for the blog post. And all the people below sharing their stories.

    It hurts when I hear my parents, grandparents, and their older generations react with hate and fear towards the LGBT community. It is time for a fundamental change in how the entire Christian community perceives, treats, and loves, people of all shapes, sizes, and sexual orientations.

    Every time another friend comes “out” to me, and the world, I rejoice in their confidence, honesty, and support them in any way I can; including affirming to them that God indeed does love them. Just the way they are. What would happen if our primary focus every single day was just showing people all around us that we loved them. I can only imagine…

  • skizzle

    To all the people saying that they’re morally opposed to homosexual acts and/or gay marriage: you hate gay people. As a closeted homo myself, you’re not fooling us at all; we can see right through your twisted brand of “love”. As Hemant Mehta so eloquently put it (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2012/08/02/if-you-oppose-marriage-equality-what-else-am-i-supposed-to-call-you/), “You can’t say I love my black friends, but I don’t think they should be
    allowed to marry white people… without simultaneously being a racist.”

    You are bigoted, hateful people. No matter, though, because you’re dying out. We have the young people on our side more and more everyday, while your insane hatred and hypocrisy are sending them fleeing from your churches in droves.

    In 10 years when your looked at with disgust for ever holding such vile beliefs about gay people, there’s only one question you need to ask yourselves: was it worth so many dead and hurting kids to try to fight the tide of civil rights? I really hope it was.

  • Goodminusgod

    Excellent blog post. However, I can’t help but notice,as I read the comments,that a lot of defensive Christians have missed the point. I see tons of comments about “the love the sinner, but hate the sin.” psst… You’re judging….you don’t like the “act”of homosexuality, don’t do it. Leave judgement up to god and move forward with YOUR life. Choose to act in the way you see fit to live yor own life, and stop thinking about what others do in their bedroom. Trust me, there are not a bunch of sex crazed homos chasing you down the the street trying to make you perform these “immoral” acts. Chances are, you’re already performing these acts with your sexual partner if youre doing anything other than missionary style. The way I read the comments below, Christians are way to preoccupied with sex, and that seems to show a sin in itself,don’t you think?

    • Jim

      Hi. Just one point, if I may…. The Bible doesn’t teach us not to “judge”. On the contrary, it teaches us to judge justly according to Scripture. When Christ said, “Judge not, lest ye be judged” he was attacking unfair, unjust judging… He likened it to a person who tries to take a speck of dust out of another’s eye, when they have a fence post in their own eye. Then Christ said, “First remove the fence post for your own eye, then you can see clearly to help remove the speck of dust that is in your bother’s eye.” In Romans 2, Paul also condemns judging, when we’re picking on other people’s sins, but doing the same exact things. Jesus taught us to judge according to “fruit”. It’s not wrong, Biblically, to ask and judge questions of morality, unless we condemn people for the same things we do. In Scripture, God & Christ both stated their love for people, and their hate for sin. The Bible also teaches us all to love another and to hate sin… your sin, my sin, all sin. The hope of my heart, is that Christians would teach the truth, but teach it in love. My heart of others is that they would receive it as truth, spoken in love, not hate.

  • Goodminusgod

    Excellent blog post. However, I can’t help but notice,as I read the comments,that a lot of defensive Christians have missed the point. I see tons of comments about “the love the sinner, but hate the sin.” psst… You’re judging….you don’t like the “act”of homosexuality, don’t do it. Leave judgement up to god and move forward with YOUR life. Choose to act in the way you see fit to live yor own life, and stop thinking about what others do in their bedroom. Trust me, there are not a bunch of sex crazed homos chasing you down the the street trying to make you perform these “immoral” acts. Chances are, you’re already performing these acts with your sexual partner if youre doing anything other than missionary style. The way I read the comments below, Christians are way to preoccupied with sex, and that seems to show a sin in itself,don’t you think?

  • http://twitter.com/floyd84 floyd84

    This is why i could never take the church seriously, maybe if you guys could work together like intelligent adults you would have come to this conclusion much sooner, saving the embarrassment and loss of respect you have caused yourselves through bad logic and reasoning.

  • http://twitter.com/floyd84 floyd84

    This is why i could never take the church seriously, maybe if you guys could work together like intelligent adults you would have come to this conclusion much sooner, saving the embarrassment and loss of respect you have caused yourselves through bad logic and reasoning.

  • Jerm C

    Great article but it missed one point. Banning gay marriage is an attack on religious freedom. It infringes on the rights of the churches that want to marry gay couples.

  • Thank_you

    Wow, this is absolutely wonderful. I am not nor ever have been Christian, (I grew up a religious Jew and am an agnostic theist) but this is by far one of the most amazing, tolerant, uplifting and accepting things I have ever read. I have received so much hatred from Christians that I had practically given up hope. When I saw this on r/ainbow I was surprised. I had never even known that this was an opinion in the Christian community. I thought this article was very well written and am so glad that I can finally be accepted in a religion. When I came out to my mother she told me “bisexuality doesn’t exist” and that it was a sin and I should be ashamed. I have not been religiously inclined since.

    • Jim

      Friend, I apologize on behalf of any Christian who has ever mistreated you. My Lord, Christ Jesus, was Jewish also and denounced hate and cruelty again anyone. I can’t condone homosexuality, because Scripture forbids it as an abomination and sin. But as both Old and New Testaments command, we much still love one another, even if we’re divided.

  • A Person

    I’m bisexual female, and I was completely shunned by an entire church community. Shunned by my closest “friends” all in the name of god. Slowly after that, I became atheist. I would never have anything to do with this god that hated me for something I never chose. You can think what you want, but if you hate in the “name of god”…. you’re acting the opposite of god. And if you’re reading this and think homosexuality is wrong, we’re going to hell…. When did YOU choose to be straight.

    • Jim

      Many straight people and church people are going to Hell too. I disagree with homosexuality because the Bible teaches that it is an abomination, a sin… The Bible teaches that all sin, whether it is homosexual, heterosexual, or non-sexual must be repented of, and even the Apostle Paul in the New Testament writes that those who habitually practice a number of different sins (including homosexuality, adultery, envy & drunkeness) are in danger of Hell and are not going to Heaven. The Bible says we’re all sinners. It says we all need to be saved through repenting of our sin, and converstion (changing) by faith in Jesus Christ. God loves you. He commands us to love each other. But the Bible, which I hold as God’s Inspired Word teaches us that we must all abandon our selfish sins.

      Love in Christ,

  • Jim

    Love in Christ! Don’t ever let anybody who claims to be a Christian hate you or any other person for any reason. Christ Himself declared, “love they neighbor as thyself” as one of the most important teachings in Scripture. Now having said that, identifying “sin” isn’t hate. Warning somebody of doom isn’t “hate”. Wanting somebody to experience redemption, forgiveness, and salvation, isn’t hate. The Bible identifies homosexuality as an “abomination” and “sin”. In fact, the Bible indentifes a lot of heterosexuality as sin also (e.g. adultery, fornication, & lust). The Bible identifies sin as destructive and harmful and as something that God hates and something that separates us from God. It’s not hate to warn somebody of sin… it’s redemptive. These things are taught in both the Old & New Testaments. The Apostle Paul noted on more than one occasion that those who practice such things are not Christians and will not enter into Heaven. The habitual practice of sin is POISONOUS to the eternal soul. We should love each other, but we should love each other enough to be truthful to each other also. I don’t decide who gets to go to Heaven and who doesn’t. God does. He is loving, but he is also holy and righteous. His word… the Bible… Scripture, demands repentance from sin and conversion through Faith in Christ Jesus… not acceptance of sin.

    • Jim

      Sorry for the typos… I’m fatigued. :-)

  • Corey

    When Same-Sex Marriage Was A Christian Rite’: [Excerpts] “Contrary to myth, Christianity’s concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual.” ,…, “Records of Christian same sex unions have been discovered in such diverse archives as those in the Vatican, in St. Petersburg, in Paris, in Istanbul and in the Sinai, covering a thousand-years from the 8th to the 18th century.” ,…, “While homosexuality was technically illegal from late Roman times, homophobic writings didn’t appear in Western Europe until the late 14th century. Even then, church-consecrated same sex unions continued to take place.” ,…, “Prof. Boswell’s academic study is so well researched and documented that it poses fundamental questions for both modern church leaders and heterosexual Christians about their own modern attitudes towards homosexuality. For the Church to ignore the evidence in its own archives would be cowardly and deceptive. The evidence convincingly shows that what the modern church claims has always been its unchanging attitude towards homosexuality is, in fact, nothing of the sort. It proves that for the last two millennia, in parish churches and cathedrals throughout Christendom, from Ireland to Istanbul and even in the heart of Rome itself, homosexual relationships were accepted as valid expressions of a God-given love and committment to another person, a love that could be celebrated, honored and blessed, through the Eucharist in the name of, and in the presence of, Jesus Christ.” (http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/whensamesexmarriagewasachristianrite.html)

  • Tim

    I tried to be a good Christian but I am gay and have always felt that I could never be accepted for me, so I no longer attend church. It seems to me that Christians in general say that they love everyone but if and you can fill in the blank. I wonder if I will ever find a love for Christ. I just do not know any more what to believe is true and are there Christians who really accept the LGBT community, and if so, where?

    Thank you for letting me share my feelings.

    • Jekell

      Tim, why do you equate not accepting something as not loving someone? You parents probably didn’t accept misbehavior or lieing or stealing but they still loved you greatly. In fact, if they would have accepted this behavior, and you would have grown up lieing and stealing, would they have been truly loving you?

      • Travis

        Jekell, to be honest, that doesn’t seem like a very good response. Tim is hurting, asking if there are Christians who can accept him, I hope you can be one of them.

        Yes, Tim, there are Christians out there, like me and many of my friends, who want you to know you are loved, beloved! You are so dear to God. Don’t let those bad experiences turn you away. You are PRECIOUS, without regard for, and even because of, your sexuality.

  • Luis

    The devil likes to imitate what is from God. I lived the gay life for more than 15 years and it wasnt till i became a friend with the Holy Spirit that I truly understood that homosexuality is a sin that separates you from God. Also The Holy Spirit showed me the Spirits behind it and it isnt something that God likes. God never changes and is a God of Order he created Man and then gave HIM a WOMAN not a MAN.

    Like I said Homosexuality is caused by a spirit of sexual disorders and you CANt be gay and say that you have God. Because it is impossible for God to lie since he isnot a man.

    Jesus says: The World with its passions will pass but MY WORD will never pass. Homosexuality IS a SIN like any other cause you are choosing a rebellious side and people just look to justify themselves and try to change the word of God for this or any other generations when in fact should be vice-versa The Word of God WILL NEVER surrender to the words of the Devil and will never change. The generations NEED to repent of their sins and come to God.

  • http://www.facebook.com/angela.babbit Angela M. Babbit

    I am borrowing your photograph for a couple of days for my facebook page. Do you know who the photographer is, so I can give them credit? I hate stealing work.

  • http://www.lilyamongthornsblog.blogspot.com/ Rubi Ruiz

    This is the best article I’ve ever read on this topic. THANK YOU!

  • What is right, what is wrong

    honestly I am appalled at this attempt to distort God’s Word and His intention for His children and then use it as a sword for the battle for homosexuality. While yes Christians are told not to judge, we are also told to not be accepting of things God himself (and not us) find an abomination against Him. I am really not trying to be ugly when I say this but that is exactly what this article is. I couldn’t be more offended by this call to Christians to stand up for what is right when God tells us what is right. Clearly the author doesn’t have a clue what God says…

  • http://www.facebook.com/danny.andrews.90 Danny Andrews

    A big difference lies between common examples of the Christian “conquest” to Christianize the world, and this one. Things such as getting prayer back in every school, putting Scripture in government buildings in Washington DC, and the like are, I would agree, largely unnecessary and distracting from that which is the Church’s its primary calling: to love to the world and lead them to Christ.
    However, gay marriage is an entirely different issue. As Christians, if you read the Bible with any sort of rigor, we believe that homosexual actions are sinful. Not praying in school and not having Bible verses posted in governmental buildings, are not.
    Although I agree that large portions of the church have spent a disproportionate amount of time leading overly harsh anti-gay marriage campaigns, I do not at all believe that we should give up this “war” entirely (just like we should never give up the fight against abortion, or the sexualization of women in our shopping malls and movies, or any other political issue with which God cares deeply about).
    Because let’s say that we did concede, “we were wrong to wage this war against you.” What does this communicate to the GLBT community? Although we were wrong to treat them hatefully, this statement implies that our entire intention, preventing that which is sinful in the community (country) we live, was wrong as well. What kind of confusion would gay married couples be in when they show up at a church later down the road and have the pastor talk to them about the sinful lifestyle they are living? They would likely say, “But you guys gave up the fight on gay marriage. We thought you were okay with it now?”
    We need to take the hate out of our speech, but we must keep the urgency.

  • merrymary

    its the SOUL we contend for..why have we all narrowed our focus to this marriage debate? Jesus is on His throne. we fight for every SOUL!!!! do not be tricked, deceived or distracted..it the SOUL! we long to bring to Him. we prepare for a SINGLE day in History..ONE single day.Rev 21:4′He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death’ or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”

  • Jekell

    Wow, what a complete and total bunch of drivel. You seriously believe Jesus would want his children to stand up and say being gay is ok? Tell me this, are you “loving” someone more by endorsing a behavior that the bible has expressly said is one of the worst sins you can commit? Or are you loving them by saying what you are doing is wrong. It will lead to a life of sorrow and enmity with the one true living God. They may not want ot hear it but laying down and apologizing for God’s word will not help those people who are lost. The Christian church today is so weak and mired in conflict avoidance they are becoming completely ineffective and irrelevant in today’s society. Jesus never withdrew from calling sin, sin and we as children of the living God shouldn’t either.

  • Nichole

    I couldn’t disagree more with this article. If you know it is wrong and sinful, would you let people go through with it without a warning? Same goes with aborting babies. Should we not try to fight for the “equality” of babies and all the government’s rulings with abortions, when we know it is murder? As Christians, we are to be yes, humble and not judgmental, but we should also not sit back and let our brother continue on sinning. Divorce is a sin. Adultery is a sin. All sin keeps us from God. The only thing saving us is Jesus. In order to be in community with Jesus, we need to run from sin, and help others do the same. We should be speaking out against sin as much as we can. Christians are not immune from sinning. All the more to SPEAK OUT and try to save the consequences of those sins. You are so right when saying pull the log out of your own eye. Sin is sin. No one is better or above that. The Word of God is what we should live by. It is unchangeable and to be held with the utmost reverence. To not speak out against something the Bible says is a sin, is not speaking up for the Word that God gave us to live by.

  • NicoeVK11

    Beautifully written. Thank you!

  • Rufus

    I left the church after several years of struggling with my realization that I had same-sex attractions and had seen a couple of different counselors. I remained celibate during this time and even tried heterosexual dating. . . In the end, nothing changed. I left the church frustrated and discouraged. After living in the gay community for 10 yrs, I tried to reconcile with the church and once again tried counseling and support groups. I was very open with my church leadership and for a time thought that this time would be different. That I would find the continued support and community that had not been there previously. I am sad to say that my attempt to connect with the Christian church has once again been met with disappointment and discouragement. The only people who have been a consistent source of support and pursued relationship with me were from the gay community. I have not been to church in over a year and that saddens me. I have not lost my faith in God or the person of Christ, but I have lost my faith in the Christian community.

  • Joshua

    Morals are legislated. Moral relativism doesn’t work. If it’s not the morals found in Scripture, it will be the morals of the secular humanist, budhist, hindu, athiest…etc. Many of the laws of our land are found in the ten commandments…don’t steal, lie, murder…etc. Shall we surrender those as well?

  • http://www.facebook.com/jael.james.311 Jael James

    Great points made and I agree with most of them. I’ll go a step further in saying that Christians are mistaken in even believing that civil marriage IS what makes a marriage. According to the bible, civil marriage is almost the exact opposite of how it is depicted in the Book. For example, Christ condemns divorce and said that Moses had it all wrong when he allowed it, but with civil marriage one can legally marry and divorce as often as he or she likes. Christ called divorce and remarriage adultery, but civil marriage calls it legal and upstanding. There’s a lot more that separates marriage as defined in the bible from civil marriage, which is why I don’t believe that Christians should continue to try to withhold or judge civil marriage by what is presented in the bible. There is a small ebook on Amazon called Marriage Without a License, which explains this in greater detail. It doesn’t so much explain it in terms of the gay marriage debate, but shows how civil marriage and marriage in the bible are contradictory to one another and definitely not the same thing. The church really shouldn’t even be involved with civil marriage since they are in stark disagreement with one another. You know, two shouldn’t walk together unless they agree.

  • Digger

    Perhaps I interpreted the author’s words wrong, but did he assert that homosexuality is not a sin because divorce and adultry are a sin?

  • Spanky Burro

    If you say, “Since the church has failed in the area of divorce, and the church is now a hypocrite, therefore you should encourage other sin, even in a civic capacity,” that is a seriously backwards statement. This is how I read part of this article. If we believe in the dignity of man, created by a loving God, we should be representing that by standing, with grace and truth, for all good and against all wrong be it sex trafficking, fatherless, poverty, or sexual perversion. And no one can honestly tell me that sticking a male part is not designed for a female part. We need to bring our definition of good from what is true. If that is from the God we serve, which is found in the Bible, then we need to stand for that same goodness.

    The answer to just give up on standing for good is a lame and failed attempt at grace. Would you apply this same logic to pornography in schools? Kids have rights to explore there sexuality, don’t they, so they should be allowed their freedom. In the vein of this article’s logic, their actions don’t impact other people, right? So it should be ok for them to see pornography, or rather encouraged and sanctioned. Or if two siblings want to get married, what’s wrong with that? There are civic consequences to our moral laws. Our civic laws play out our morality. To say we should protect something because people do it, that’s just silly. Of course our actions affect others around us. We discriminate against all sort of sexual behavior because it’s not helpful to society.

    Yes we need to love, in word and in deed. We need to invite people into our lives who believe different and live in the truth and grace Jesus shows us. Let’s not forget the truth when we have the grace.

    And if people disagree with us, slamming them with our laws will hurt. And the same is happens to me when I am forced to protect something I don’t agree with. That is a consequence of living together. So we are at an impasse We must evaluate what is best for our society. When we open the doors to redefine marriage, we end up with countless possibilities. This is a serious problem. Will we protect 2 men and 2 women getting married? We might have to if we follow the logic of this paper.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Fred-Smith/100001817115732 Fred Smith

    For
    the Christian to surrender on this cardinal issue would be to surrender
    on gender distinction, monogamy, permanence, complementarity–one
    flesh, procreation, and the quantity of marriage partners. These
    elements of biblical marriage are never surrendered from Genesis to
    Revelation. The onus is on the author of this reckless piece to
    exegetically prove otherwise. Until then he is just ignoring the obvious
    while arguing the ridiculous, which he does very well.

  • Nathan

    When I was around 13, I started experimenting with cross-dressing. In some twisted way, I thought that if I became a hermaphrodite, lusting after myself, I wouldn’t have to deal with the desire I felt toward girls. Since that time, I have struggled with transsexual thoughts from time to time, as well as with fetishes related to this. I stumbled onto erotic literature online. It became a dangerous, exhilarating, guilt-inducing addiction. I confessed at various times to my parents; they were bewildered and concerned, but they affirmed me as their son, praying for me and doing what they could in the way of counsel, accountability, sympathy, and a listening ear.

    During this time, I memorized Romans 6-8, with the idea that my mind was a muscle. When I tried to shut my eyes to block out the images or twitch to distract myself from the feelings, it was like a welding arc: snap, snap, flash, then blackness and I couldn’t concentrate on anything else. Then, as instead of blocking things out, I memorized scriptures and constantly wrestled with tears as they related to my situation, I saw little changes. Burdened with temptation, guilt and depression, I would sit in the truck on a hot day reading the psalms: “rescue me from evil men…” pleading with God because the evil man I most needed rescuing from was inside of me.

    Another source of pain at this time (age 16 or 17) was online forums. I would get on threads debating the existence of God, and though I was arguing that God exists, the mindset of the doubters actually got through to me. I argued with Calvinists that a true Christian could fall away if he really wanted to. Daringly, I thought that I could win the argument by being a true Christian who fell away and killed himself. Then I would know who was right. Or if God wasn’t really there, then I could go on and be a transsexual, and none of it would even matter (except what my family would think). But if I was wrong… and God was there… I didn’t want to think about hell.

    Around this time, I read Romans 7, where Paul said “what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do…” Bishop Spong thinks Paul wrote this because he was secretly gay. I think Paul simply speaks the truth of the whole human condition, gays included. This sparked something in my mind: if the Bible has in there exactly what I’m feeling as I’m struggling with sin and doubting God, then I haven’t subsumed it with my doubting. It has actually subsumed me, and the whole thing is true after all… such that it fully describes my problem, and after that describes the solution, namely Jesus, who can deliver me from to body of sin and death and bring me to a place where there is no condemnation.

    After this, feeling some relief but still a bit heavy, I boarded a plane for a summer mission trip in China. While I was there, I stayed in a fourth-floor dormitory. One day, my old doubts came back… how do I know that God is really in control of my decisions? Who’s to say that he’s sovereign? If I threw myself over the railing right now and died (suicide being in my mind an unpardonable sin), wouldn’t that prove that I could make my own choices? And wouldn’t that also put an end to all these mental struggles about sexuality? So I leaned over the rail, and looked down. Then I backed away and told myself that there was no way I was jumping because I want to live. I realized then that God was the one giving me the desire to live, as a means of preserving his child. Then I gave up and let him win.

    The following year, I faced another troubling experience. When I was taking a class on family law and studying the legal arguments for and against gay marriage, I found myself coming around sympathetically to the pro-gay point of view… I even feared as I began reading the cases more eagerly that I was starting to feel solidarity with a gay identity or even to feel homosexual desires. I again confessed to my parents, and they prayed for me again.

    Since that crisis in China, though, I’ve been committed to living and to being a Christian. I have still had times of backsliding, mostly related to internet addiction, but also self-harm, fantasies and depression, all pointing back to transsexual desire as a refuge. I’ve also struggled with strong feelings for guys that I cared about, which I interpreted as homosexual thoughts. I look at this homosexual interpretation as a category confusion, where the thing that could be homosexual is actually a desire for strong, intimate friendship rather than the other thing.

    Right now I have an accountability relationship with my dad and also an old friend, where we encourage each other spiritually and hold each other’s feet to the fire if either of us starts viewing pornography or other things that provide avenues for sinful lust. I need that.

    As time goes on, I’m able to see with wider eyes. To look past the chemical responses of my brain. To know when I need help. To know that this too will pass. To know where a cycle will lead me if I choose to step into it again. To know that everyone feels vulnerable sometimes, and that’s ok. I know who I am.

    I look at gender confusion and homosexual lust and practice as impermissible on moral grounds, and if I were able to make the laws, I would not define marriage to include same-sex relationships. But I still identify with GLBTs as people and as people with wounds and sins that I share. That’s why I wince every time someone says “let’s give up the fight against gay marriage” and wince even more when they say “God hates fags”.

    The sin of Sodom, according to Ezekiel, includes the following two tragedies: “they put on airs and lived obscene lives.” I don’t want to be proud of my sin. And I don’t want to be proud of my “righteousness”. I only want to point others to Jesus, who is the source of love and righteousness for everyone: gays, transsexuals, and church-goers included.

    I don’t look at trans-, homo-, bi-, or pan-sexuality as my identity. I hope to marry a girl someday, but my identity isn’t there either. My identity is safe with Christ, and I’ll follow where he takes me, but it’s not going to be returning to the fever of sexual confusion.

    All the clergy members that I have come out to have been sympathetic and supportive. One, a youth pastor, asked to listen to my story and became a dear friend and was my accountability partner for a year. Another, the wife of a pastor in Taiwan, said “we think the Christian life is easy, but it’s not.” She and her husband both spurred me on in my goal to enter Christian ministry, without shaming me at all. And my own grandfather, a pastor and counselor for over fifty years, I finally trusted to tell my story a year before he died. I was afraid of what his reaction would be, but he said it was only one of love and concern, and he prayed for me and supported me on my journey.

    I came out to a non-Christian friend in Taiwan, one whom I hoped I could “witness to”, but who instead wanted to help me and hear me out because I seemed so burdened and depressed (this was during a backsliding time). It was so painful, because he was so nice to listen and pry my guilt and worries out into the open, but he wanted me to accept myself as gay. I couldn’t do that, and I told him why; it was awkward, but he accepted my reasons, and we remained close friends.

    Now I’m living in Thailand, where there are all kinds of young ladyboys. It was the scene of my biggest fears, but although they make me uncomfortable, I still have empathy with them. I want to give these guys acceptance and friendship, and still lead them to the God who has a place for them in his plan, which includes the gender he sovereignly gave them. Such a place of tension. But I hope that as I learn to follow Jesus closer, that maybe the pain in my life can help someone else.

  • thinking about solutions

    I know this post was written over a year ago, but I feel the need to pipe in here. I have struggled with this debate. I personally feel that I as a Christian don’t have the right to dictate the choices of another human being. I have the responsibility to share Christ’s love and gospel of truth with them, but their choices are between them and God. When I get to Heaven I am only going to be responsible for my action, not theirs. So all that to say, if a man chooses to marry another man – that is between those men and God and likewise for women. The problem I have had with the legislation that has been written has to do with the further ramifications that I don’t hear people talking about much – like it opening a door for the LGBT community to sue a church or pastor for discrimination when they refuse to marry them. You touched on this a little in the post, but said that was for a later post. And in CA there was talk about mandated teaching of it in schools, which infuriated me as a parent trying to raise my children with Christian values. I understand them wanting to not have bullying, but they don’t teach on marriage at all now. There was a definite agenda beyond giving people the choice to choose who they want to marry. I know for me, it’s not that I want to deny someone a choice. I just don’t want to have to pay for that choice, because I don’t agree with that choice.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.duley.54 Dan Duley

    So called same sex marriage has nothing to do with equal rights as often proclaimed. It is about special rights. I cannot marry another man (in most states) neither can a self identified homosexual. We are both treated equally under the law. Therefore no discrimination.

    This is really less a “christian” issue and more of a issue of why marriage exists and the interest of the state in providing regulation. People of all faiths and no faith marry. The recognition and legal responsibility of those entering marriage is of great interest to the state. A society is founded on and prospers on successful intact marriages.

    The regulation and “definition” of marriage is not some arbitrary esoteric idea. Societies around the world and through time have limited marriage in many ways. They limit marriage based on age, blood relationship, the number of spouses, even the social and religious standing of the individuals. The impact of these ‘limits” on marriage has been the study of social scientists for years.

    Further, most of the benefits of marriage can be conferred upon any couple that chooses to do so. A few simple signed legal documents. Again no discrimination.

    The debate of course is about society acknowledging the legitimacy of homosexual behavior, to encourage individuals to, at the least, experiment with sexual deviancy, if not embrace it.

    Part of this acceptance is an acknowledgement that the individual that engages in sexual activity with members of the same sex is in some way not a heterosexual creature. We are not defined by our impulses and desires. An individual that has no sexual desire or behavior is not somehow something other than a heterosexual creature. I am not addressing the issue of where these desires come from, or the legitimacy of those desires. A man may have a desire to have sexual relations with many women, children, animals, men. The fact that those desires exist from whatever cause is no reason to change the definition of marriage.

    The reasons to keep the definition to one man and one women, not of close relation, of a certain age has proven to be beneficial to society,individuals and marriage itself.

×

TRENDING: 5 God Excuses to Avoid After A Natural Disaster>>