Let Them Eat Cake

That’s what she said.

It wasn’t out of malice or even hard-heartedness that Marie Antoinette supposedly uttered these now infamous words, but out of a barnacled ignorance that grows and eventually blinds all people who live in positions of advantage for extended periods of time…

Entitlement.

Marie suffered from the same blindness that American Christians suffer so greatly from today:

We actually think we’re the oppressed majority…
We actually think we’re under attack…
We actually think people are waging war on our values…

We’ve become accustomed to our particular Christian values being the exclusive values of the United States of America. We’ve lost sight that the same people we’re convinced are waging war on our bastions of society (or morality) are, in fact, our co-inhabitors of this country who are equal inheritors of the words of our founding fathers.

These are not peasant rabblers at our gates trying to take “our” country.
These are not gays and immigrants trying to loot “our” ideals…
These are not occupiers, socialists and anarchists who simply hate “our” politics.

These are US citizens, made in the likeness and image of God.
And how we choose to respond to them, says more about us than them.

It’s odd when I look back on history and see stories such as the French Revolution. I’m so often struck at the blindness of the entitled population to the climate of the time. There is a cyclical struggle where entitled people really do feel that they are being oppressed and “kicked-out” of being able to participate in society. I often hear this fear rise-up from many of my conservative Christian friends, but I gently remind them of this:

You’re not being oppressed.
You’re being asked to be inclusive of others.

You’re not being kicked-out.
You’re being asked to share the rights and liberties that you now enjoy.

I realize as I’m watching current events unfold that it’s difficult for a segment of Christians to recognize this because we’ve become so entrenched that we own the exclusive right to dictate terms to others in our society, and anyone who challenges this exclusive right is obviously oppressing us! We’re uncomfortably comfortable demanding other faiths, oriented people, races, and genders obey our specific personal brands of Jesus, which sadly, violates the very pattern of humanity Jesus shows us.

I have big news for everyone…

We’re all witnessing, before our very eyes, those days racing toward a very swift culmination. The days when Christians dictate all the terms of engagement in society by crafting all the laws to reflect our specific spiritual practices are coming to a quick end.

Society has shifted under Christians feet, but many of us have yet to realize it.

In twenty years our children will think it is strange that gay people couldn’t get married, just like I think it’s strange that my black friends couldn’t eat at the same counter as me, or that I could actually buy one of my black friends just 150 years ago! In twenty years it will seem normal that Christianity is just one of several perspectives in the civic (and civil) discourse.

In twenty years almost every Christian will understand the rights and importance of being inclusive of our LGBTQ neighbors. Think I’m crazy? Try finding an older Christian who will admit that they rallied against Martin Luther King, or that they voted against women being given the right to vote.

Christians cannot delay the inevitable.

Now please, understand that this is not a threat, or some literary shot across the bow to my fellow Christians…this is my desperate attempt to help you realize that entitled groups (who naturally exclude those who are not like them) only flourish for so long. Let me be abundantly clear, this has nothing to do with personal belief! Christians have the right to hold onto their beliefs regarding gay people, or women, or politics or birth-control…but we’ll need to let go of the idea that we, American Christians, have any right to pass laws that force others live under our moral code.

Because, and I want you to hear this, current “rights” issues are not about gay people. Just like its wasn’t about black folks, or women years ago. This is about us and our entitlement. The conversation surrounding gay marriage is exposing the issues barnacled onto our hearts…just like the peasants need for affordable bread exposed Marie Antoinette’s perspective.

There is one common ending for groups who resist loving their neighbor as themselves, refusing to be inclusive of others, and stubbornly entrenching themselves as the sole keepers and scribes of all social norms, laws, and liberties for as long as they can…

They eventually all suffer the fate of Marie Antoinette.

So, let me take a few final words and implore Christians to re-imagine with me a new ending to this cycle we find ourselves in. I’m re-imagining an ending where Christians choose to live out the teachings of Jesus and pro-actively include others who differ from them, even loving them without agenda. I’m re-imagining a new beginning where we move beyond ‘us and them’ and finally see the world the Way that God sees it, with only an ‘us.’ Let us each be determined to shake off the scales of blindness, and realize  that there is no cake for some in the US to eat. Finally, let us steadfastly work together toward a bold new world that Jesus will be proud to come back to where He finds His followers no longer trapped in proving that we are right, but in every moment…

Proving that we are love.

—–
Jimmy Spencer Jr (@jimmyspencerjr) is the founder and CEO of Love Without Agenda and author of Love Without Agenda: Moving Our Spiritual Goalposts from Heaven & Hell to Wholeness. He’s just a good guy trying to change the world—and himself—one act of love at a time.

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

Print Friendly

About the Author

Jimmy Spencer Jr.

Jimmy Spencer Jr.Jimmy Spencer Jr. (@jimmyspencerjr) is the founder and CEO of Love Without Agenda and author of Love Without Agenda: Moving Our Spiritual Goalposts from Heaven & Hell to Wholeness. He’s just a good guy trying to change the world—and himself—one act of love at a time.View all posts by Jimmy Spencer Jr. →

  • Tarl_hutch

    Mr. Spencer,
    You took the words right out of my mouth. I am a resident of North Carolina which has become the showcase for this very issues as of late. The sentiments of your post are the exact same ones that I have been stressing to my friends and neighbors.

    Thank you for writing an article that tackles this very tough issue in such a way that hopefully will be understood by all. It is a long road ahead and I feel that as long as we proceed in love we can move in a new direction. God bless.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

      Thanks. I’ll be checking in throughout the next few days and chatting with folks. I still come and lurk on the blog occasionally and appreciate the kindness and depth of your comments that I have read on various articles….there are some who aren’t so kind to folks…so thank you for bringing a sense of civility to the comments section :)

      • Tarl_hutch

        The easy way is to slip into anger, mockery, and self-righteousness, I feel we are never going to get anywhere if we can’t even talk to each other. I am just glad there are other people out there working for change without losing what makes following Christ so unique.

        Thank you for your kind words and for all you are doing. Hopefully we will have some more discussion here soon.

        • Drew

          I ran out of room above to respond to you, so I will do it here –

          Learn how to spell his name right – it is Driscoll.  Also, slow down – I never said I subscribe to him verbatim.  I made it clear that I am not of his Church or of his denomination, but that I agreed with him on one point.

          Unfortunately, we are not to love false teachers and false teachings, Tarl.  You find this acceptable due to the liberal idea that there are multiple truths; I find this unacceptable due to Scripture itself saying that there are not multiple truths.

          That being said, we can have disagreements in the faith.  I just think on the topic there cannot be an honest disagreement.

          Now thankfully, coming to this website is a small part of my day, and talking about this topic is an even smaller part of my day.  I am too busy living out my life.  This is the only blog I visit regularly, besides the blog of my Pastor and occasionally one sports blog, and the only one I post on.  You would be mistaken if you thought this was even but a fraction of what I do or what I am about.  However, when I see something false, I will state what I believe.  It might make Jimmy mad, but I am not supposed to please Jimmy.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Wow, harsh much? Typos happen. :-/

            Can you point me to the specific verse that says there are not multiple truths? Or perhaps, could you tell me what you think of this statement: “All truth is God’s truth”? How am i to know that your “truth” is the real truth?

          • Drew

            She spelled it wrong every single time; seems to me like she might not be familiar with him.  Maybe I am wrong.

            John 8:31-32 will answer your question on truth, along with other passages.

            As far as recognizing false teachings and false teachers, that is a topic in and of itself.  I will only say that there is a lot of it out there, and I hope you are able to discern.  Keep in mind, I fully realize that there are some areas where disagreement can occur, and that is okay and acceptable.  However, in terms of redefining sin, that is rough territory.  If the Bible says something is a sin, and you deny that it is a sin, and cheerfully sin, then the only hope is that ignorance justifies unrepentance.

          • Tarl_hutch

            Sorry for the misspelling, I guess I don’t really care enough to check. Second. I am a guy, I know it is a weird name, but thought I would let you know.

            My point that I am really tired if making and thus will stop after this, is that there certainly is one absolute truth, as is implied by the word truth, but we as humans cannot claim to be gods that can fully comprehend the truth. Frankly, to claim to have the absolute truth implies that you have godlike knowledge and wisdom. I know you will not agree, but wanted to say it anyway.

            I too only really visit this blog and a couple others and I really enjoy the conversation. I do not enjoy the tone that is sometimes taken by people who feel they are totally right and make snarky comments. I know you are better than this, as I have seen your other posts and discussed with you before. I look forward to talking with you on other posts, but I think we have run our course on this one. Much love, Tarl

          • Tarl_hutch

            Oh, and sadly I am very familiar with Driscoll and piper and the whole lot. From both ends I’m afraid, as someone who used to follow their brand, who has now grown in a different direction.

          • Questioning

            First of all, there are many things Scripture is not clear on, or maybe more correctly, where our puny human understanding of it, is not clear.  Rightfully, this is why we keep going back to it for fresh insight and knowledge.  I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating. We have 10 ‘s of thousands of different Protestant denominations.  Why?   Am I Calvinist or not?  once saved always saved?  Some don’t believe in musical instruments during worship. Some would not go to a church without them.  Are the women’s heads covered? Are they silent?  There is a group, after yanking a passage from the end of Mark, display their truth by handling snakes and drinking poison.  My denomination frowns on drinking while seeming to give gluttony a pass and gluttony is one of the 7 deadly sins.  If I am cheerfully overeating am I doomed?  And on and on….. Church pews are filled with sinful, broken people clinging to the promises. Every day the scriptures are searched for fresh truth and new revelation…..    and yes different interpretations are often offered.  None of us should assume we have a corner on truth and false teaching .  We would all do well to reread Romans 7:1-25. It shouldn’t be a legalistic view and it’s not about interpreting it anyway we want to rationalizing this and that.  It’s about the heart and a relationship with Christ.  It’s about intention.  Am I desiring to please Him in my heart, knowing that I can never be free from sin in this flesh.  It’s about fruit.  Am I loving God and my neighbor?  Love covers over a multitude of sins.                               

          • Drew

            Questioning,

            I agree with a lot of what you said.

            I am not saying that there cannot be differences; what I am saying is that on “some” issues, there should not or cannot be differences.

  • Otrotierra

    Jesus was undeniably opposed to divorce, yet U.S. religious fundamentalists are curiously silent on criminalizing and outlawing divorce. In fact, the divorce rate among U.S. christians is remarkably high.

    Thus, if they are as concerned as they claim to be about marriage and the bible, religious fundamentalists have a long way to go toward getting rid of the log in their own eye.

    • Tarl_hutch

      I have been using this argument as well, but I do worry if pointing out areas were more conservative Christians are conspicuously silent is not like teasing an angry pitbull.

      I am fearful that this logic may backfire and cause more people to rally behind a new push to “clean up” our society. A new religious jihad if you will. Plus this seems to enrage some people, instead of showing their blindness to the issues at play.

      The last thing we need is more “us vs them” mentality, but hoe can we lovingly show them another perspective without rallying battlelines? Thoughts?

      • Otro tierra

        Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I’m not sure what to do about the angry pitbull of U.S. religious fundamentalism. Their steady stream of hatred, fear-mongering, and deception has only worsened since Obama took office.

        But because Jesus was undeniably clear in his opposition to deceit and hatred of one’s neighbors, this is common ground for mobilizing and community-building across differences.   

        • Tarl_hutch

          I have been shocked by the receptiveness of some of my more “conservative” friends. While talking to them in a respectful and even toned manner, I have seen many of the open up to at least discuss a more open and loving approach. This article gets it right that many Christians feel threatened and under attack, but instead of considering why this may be happening, they go on the defense. Jesus called us to not be stumbling blocks to those who ate searching and yet we continue to build walls to defend our beliefs while keeping others out.

          When we lovingly question these actions and logically consider what is happening, we can begin to address the real issues. Such as our castle building mentality and our agenda motivated love. I have had many conversations where I have been able to shed light on the purely un-biblical actions and motivations so many churches have adopted.

          Unfortunately, many have accused me of ignoring God’s justice in favor of a cheap grace, these folks have a tough time envisioning a God who can love unconditionally. This derives from some of our doctrines that may need to be revisited and revised. Many people do not realize that their dogmas did not begin in the bible, but in the first few hundred years by some good and not so good interpretations by those in power of the church.

          How do we begin to revision our doctrines in light of their history and consequences? Perhaps more importantly how do we inspire other American Christians to give up their comfortable politics and lifestyles in favor of Jesus’s loving and humanity acknowledging mission?

          • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

            yes. yes, and yes! great thoughts. love without agenda 

  • Anonymous

    so well said, jimmy. i pray that as this conversation continues to move forward we may be able to see the difference between personal conviction about ethics/morality and issues of justice.  thank you for helping stretch our (re)imagination.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

      thanks man. hope you are well…mind retweeting this when you get a chance?  Gonna spread this one around a bit :)

  • awesome!

    Excellent my man. Well put.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

      Awesome! ;)

  • Matt

    Frankly, all of this comparing the gay rights movement to the civil rights movement against segregation is incredibly insulting to black Americans. How is it that people see these issues as att all similar? Homosexuality is expressly condemned all throughout the bible including the new testament. Being black is not. Now of course Christians shouldn’t try to legislate our morality, but please stop belittling our black brothers and sisters. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

      Frankly Matt, I made zero comparison to whether one thing was biblical or not—this is about Christians who think they are right completely comfortable denying other citizens the ability to the pursuit of life and liberty and happiness (when it does no harm to them)

      That is where the comparison is clear and applicable to both groups. Both LGBT & black brothers and sisters have experienced this.

      I thought that was abundantly clear in the article, perhaps not?

      • Matt

        You are contradicting yourself. You stated in the article that Christians shouldn’t make others live under their moral code. As an American Exceptionalist Neo-Con and proud member of the social conservative right, I 100% completely agree with you.

        In NC there was a free and fair, up and down, vote on the issue of a ban of gay marriage amendment. The majority won. Pretty overwhelmingly so. Who was denied anything? Both sides campaigned and spent money and explained their positions. One side won. Where’s the “entitlement” here? Who was excluded?

        So if you say that Christians shouldn’t force their morals on other people, should not democracy decide marriage laws within states then? Christianity wasn’t forced on anyone in NC. The people demanded it.

        The irony is that in your article you accuse of those of us who are “entitled” (which makes no sense, by the way) of denying gay people their equal due and forcing our views upon them. But what you are advocating for is for democracy and the public will to be thrown out and have the anti-Christian viewpoint shoved down the throats of the majority of Americans. More evidence of leftist activism on the non-partisan (I laughed typing that) Red Letter Christians.

        And seriously, calling gay rights the new civil rights movement and comparing it women’s suffrage is true intellectual laziness. There is zero comparison here. Do better. Its getting boring to read this one argument that can be dismantled within seconds. That’s probably why NC just destroyed the opposition at the polls.

        • Matt2

          Oh, and just for the sake of clarity…I’m a different Matt than the one before. I can see him reading it and being like, “Who’s this crazy cat trying to be me?” I’m not trying to be him.

        • Nathaniel Jordan

          The argument isn’t “dismantled” as you say. It sounds like you reject the premise that Rights shouldn’t be voted on. When you can’t even agree on terms for the discussion, there really isn’t any value in talking about the actual issue.

          The first conversation that must be had is, “Do you believe that Rights should be voted upon by the public?”

          Rights ought never be subject to a popular vote. Should the people have voted on the right to vote for women? The right to freedom for slaves? These examples directly correlate to the right to marry that gays and lesbians are currently fighting for.Democracy is the best system of government when we are deciding what is best for a community. A vote on a 1/8th cent tax to improve public schools is something everyone should get a vote on. Democracy used to prevent people from pursuing happiness is abusive.Once a person comes to the conclusion that Rights shouldn’t be voted on, the next conversation is about marriage as a right.-I am using the capitol “R” Rights to discuss the concept of privileges guaranteed by the government, not specific rights like voting or marriage-

          • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

            Well said Nathaniel. Thanks for your tempered and even-toned comment. Civility is a modern spiritual gift ;)

          • Matt

            No one is denying gay people the right to do anything though. What “right” are they speaking about. No one had denied them their inherent rights to life, liberty, and property. The police still protect them. They can vote. They have freedom of speech. They have freedom of religion. The list goes on. And no one is denying them the right to be in a homosexual relationship. The majority of states though in this country, either through direct vote, or representative vote have said that they don’t want to recognize gay marriage as legal. Since this is supposedly a Christian blog, I would assume that everyone here would agree that homosexuality is moral depravity, so should we not celebrate when homosexuality is defeated at the ballot box.

            At the same time, if the NC initiative failed the gay marriage law was overturned in that state and it became legal, as long as it happened through the democratic process, I’m ok with the results. Maybe not on a personal and religious level, but on a liberty level, sure.

            What part of this is so controversial, except maybe that leftist activism has been getting destroyed lately and people are getting antsy with the election coming up.

          • Tarl_hutch

            I think the big issue is whether marriage is a right or just another perk of being an American? Gay Americans feel it is their right to marry someone they love, is it our right to deprive them of their own pursuit of happiness?

            Of course you can argue it is not a right and democratically decided that gay marriage should remain illegal. I live in NC and was a bit shocked to see only 34% of registered voters making such a decision for the whole state. It was especially suspect that it was done on a primary ballot in a year with only primarily republican candidates up for selection. But you can argue how it is the responsibility of the voters to get out and decide thus only harming themselves if they don’t vote. True, but why should this even be an issue decided on a ballot?

            I thank you for adding your voice to the conversation and admitting that you would be fine, at least politically with whatever decision the voters decide. How should the church engage with the lgbt community? How can we show them we aren’t bigoted and hateful? Also, is it the Christian way, the grace filled way of Christ, to legislate our beliefs or are we to be am example of another way?

            Also, it is a bit presumptuous to assume all Christians believe exactly the same on this issue. There ate a growing number of gay affirming churches in America and a wide range of opinions in the body of Christ. You can argue that there ate four to sox verses that speak about homosexuality, but that is a very minuscule amount that some feel leaves room for doubt.
            Thoughts?

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

            So i’m gay and a Christian and all i hear as i read this is “They, they, they… [are a] moral depravity.”

            If such an us vs. them mindset (not to mention the judgment) is all Christianity has to offer, i have to wonder, why do i try so hard to stick around in the faith?

          • Tarl_hutch

            Ally,

            You have hit the nail on the head, it is easy for people to be steadfast in their beliefs regardless of the outcomes when we forget that real people are involved. When it is abstract people are capable of anything, but sometimes all it takes to change someone’s opinion is to coke face to face with another human being.

            Thank you for raising this point and sharing personally. Just know there are still Christians working to break down barriers and go from us vs them to we.

            It is a long road, but we can get there if we are willing to talk with each other and try to remember that we are all part of the same loving, dysfunctional family.

          • Drew

            I cannot agree with you on this sentiment.  A lot of the evil in the Church today is precisely because there are people who are not steadfast in their beliefs and in the Word.  I would love to tell everyone exactly what they want to hear regardless of whether or not it is Biblical, but that is not what we we are called to do.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Thank you, Tarl_hutch.

          • Matt

            Homosexuality is very clearly defined in the Bible as a sin. Its pretty cut and dry, case closed on that one. Now, I’m not gay but that doesn’t make me any better than you. I am a sinner just like every other person who has ever lived and all sins are equal-another Biblical truth. The beauty of the gospel is that redemption and reconciliation through Christ is equal and free to everyone as well. So where’s the judgement?

            I am not anti-humanity. I am very pro-salvation through Christ Jesus. I am however,  extremely anti-liberal, and although liberals are free to have their opinion, I try to defeat them politically. Its called being civic-minded.

            I will not however concede Biblical truth. Sin is sin.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Matt-

            Given your apparent need to “defeat” liberals, i doubt you’ll be open enough to hear what i have to say but i do want to address your comment.

            You may find what the Bible says about homosexuality to be “cut and dry”, but not all people have that interpretation. Six verses do not outweigh a message of love and redemption. Further, cultural context matters and what is clear is that we do not (and cannot) fully know what the biblical writers meant– it’s possible these verses refer only to religious prostitution and/or adult male-to-child-male relations, which would be abuse.

            Tell me, do you believe homosexual orientation is sin, or is the sin “just” homosexual behavior? May i find a woman attractive as you might find a woman attractive?  May i hold hands with  woman? Kiss a woman? May i be in a celibate relationship with a woman? Or, as a lesbian, is my entire existence a moral depravity?  Where is the line? That you said homosexuals are a moral depravity is a judgment.

          • Drew

            Ally,

            The Bible is really pretty clear and dry on most issues.  The problem is when we run into Satan, when we run into false teachers, and when we let our sinful nature creep into the story.

            If the Bible is inspired by God, we can most definitely understand what it means.  Saying we can’t understand the Bible is a dispersion upon God (that he could not produce a book that is understood) and is generally used as an excuse to do whatever we want instead of what the Bible says.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Y’know what’s awesome about your argument? It’s an automatic win, ’cause what can i say that demonstrates i respect the Bible as you do? i can’t say anything, because my conclusions are different from yours and that apparently means i want an excuse to do whatever i want. See, awesome argument. :-)

          • Nekouken

             Drew, the Bible really isn’t clear on most issues.  The issue, for example, of homosexuality, does seem pretty clear, right up until you read the New Testament.  Jesus tells us that the law exists for man, not the other way around.  If you acknowledge that a person’s sexuality is a pert of who they are, and not something they can choose  out of spite, then that passage is relevant.  How does the law serve if it punishes people for who they are?  This is one major reason why the right has fought so hard to insist that homosexuality is a choice, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

            It’s strange to me that you say the Bible is clear on most issues.  The Tanakh, what you know as the Old Testament, has been studied relentlessly by people smarter than you and me hoping to gain the right understanding of the meaning of the stories — many of which provide conflicting messages and morals when taken at their surface values — and possibly even to grasp the purpose of paradox in the books, which is undeniably there and mysterious enough that it’s been a subject of intense discussion for many millenia with no resolution.  If you think the Bible is so clear, why don’t you call up a rabbi and explain it to him?  I’m sure he’d appreciate the time you’d be saving him.  Without all the mysteries of the Tanakh to explore, he could maybe take up a hobby that’s less a waste of his time, like learning the banjo.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Nekouken, you make a good point– that we, as Christians, hijacked Judaism and their Scriptures for our own purposes has done a great disservice not only to our Jewish brothers and sisters, but to ourselves in our understanding of the Christian faith.

          • Drew

            The Bible is pretty clear on most issues.  Satan’s greatest asset is the ability to make what is clear seem unclear.  From the temptation of Adam and Eve to Jesus, Satan has been at work doing exactly that – making the clear unclear.

          • Drew

            I’m not saying that you lack respect, but rather, lack knowledge.  There are lots of false teachings swirling around the Church – always has been the case and always will be the case.

            Of course we can have different conclusions on the same topic. 
            However, there are some things we can just not have reasonable, different conclusions about, and I strongly believe that this is one of them.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

            We’ll just have to agree to disagree, then.

          • Drew

            Just because you disagree does not mean you are correct, it just means that you still lack knowledge.  Driscoll actually has a great sermon on April 6, 2008 called “Revelation: God Speaks.”  I don’t go to his Church, and I belong to a different denomination, but I think he did a great job on this.  The Bible is not unclear; we often understand and do not want to believe, so we try to find loopholes.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             May i repeat your words back to you– “Just because you disagree does not mean you are correct”. Are you open to the possibility that you’re wrong? We have different interpretations of the Bible– i can’t say with any certainty that i’m right, i don’t think that you can say with any certainty that i’m wrong.

          • Tarl_hutch

            It is funny you should bring up Drischoll, the same guy says ‘I couldn’t worship a guy I can beat up’, and is well known for making inflamatory statements. I would argue that if one is so worried about false teachers, one needs to seriously pay attention to what Drischoll says.

            I say this not to accuse Drischoll of being a false teacher, but to illustrate the point that it is counter productive to run around calling each other Satan and tearing each other down. Now do I agree with much of what drischoll says, no, but I also don’t truly believe he is a false teacher. I believe he is human. Just like all of us, and we can’t claim to have the final word on anything because we are not God.

            Thankfully we do have God in is and thus can work out and interpret his words and hear his call. I think we should do as the bible says and judge by the fruit we are producing. In relation to the fruits of the spirit, what seems to produce the most fruit, loving ones neighbor and loving without agenda or fighting for what we think of as truth and not compromising no matter the consequences?

            I say all this to cause us to think, even if we don’t have our theologies perfectly formulated or we have some doubts, does not render us incapable of following God, living the love of Christ, and redeeming the cosmos.

            Thoughts?

          • Drew

            We have a God that says “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.”

            This is a very hard concept for liberals to fathom.  No, there are not many truths, and all opinions or viewpoints are not valid.  There are certain, hard, unalterable truths in the Bible.

            So no, I will not say that your version of “truth” is equally valid, because it is not the truth.  You are clinging to what you want the Bible to say and to the false teaching you have been taught.

          • Ally C

            What’s cool about that verse is the Truth it speaks- Jesus and Jesus alone is the Saviour of humanity. Not our theology, not our doctrine, not even our faith- Jesus.

            On a side not, I truly do not understand your need to denigrate those who are theologically or politically (at this point, I’m not sure which it is but it may be both) more liberal than you…care to shed light on that attitude?

          • Drew

            You can believe whatever you want to believe; I am simply saying you are wrong, because Scripture contradicts what you are saying.  If you want me to say that you are right, or that sin can be both a sin and not a sin, is something I will not do.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Hmm, i never said that i want you to say i’m right– if you’ll notice, what i did say what that we’ll have to agree to disagree.

            i am still curious as to why you feel the need to denigrate those who do not fall under the same political or theological rubric as you.

          • http://www.facebook.com/chrisalgoo Chris Algoo

            Thanksforkeeping upthe fight,Ally. We havea longroadahead of us.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

          I’m sure you think that you have “destroyed my argument in seconds”. Well done. Thanks for being a shining example of the entitlement & fear that I describe. After reading many of your comments on this blog thru Disqus I wonder why you come to argue & insult folks like me? 

          There is certainly no sense of respect or civility in your comments. Perhaps you might enjoy another blog more? 

          • Matt

            I fear nothing. I’m not a bigot or a homophobe. I have political and moral disagreements with the gay marriage crowd. How am I afraid and what am I afraid of?

            And how were you insulted? Because I called you a leftist? Why do leftists always hate being called leftists when they are clearly leftists? If they shoe fits, wear it, I say.

            And you’re right, I have very little respect for the modern American liberal. But if you want civility, maybe politics isn’t the right game for you.

          • mike

            You did destroy his argument and he did not answer yout rebuttal.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            Sign posted: “please do not feed the trolls!” 

          • Matt

            Free and open debate-Making liberals scared since forever.

          • Frank

            Actually he destroyed your argument quite effectively. Sad that you refuse to see that, you might have actually learned something.

        • Matty

          We love the truth when it enlightens us, but we hate it when it convicts us.~Augustine.
          The truth is that homosexualty does harm homosexuals as well as the culture.According to the Center for Disease Control, more than 82% of all known sexually transmitted AIDS cases in 2006 were the result of male to male sexual contact.Moreover gay and bisexual men account for more than 60% of all syphilis cases.Data shows the life span for homosexuals are shortened 8-20 years. Despite improvementsin blood screenings, there are nearly 10,000 cases in the US of innocentpeople who have contracted AIDS through transfusions as well as innocent spouseswho have contrated STD’s due to bisexual contact. There are higher health insurancepremiums due to this as well. According to the Gay and Lesbian Medical Assoc,Lesbians have the richest concentration of breast cancer than any subsetof women in the world. They have higer risks of cervical cancers, higher %’s ofobesity, they use more tobacco, alcohol & illicit drugs. They have higher ratesof Hep C, have more than twice the # of male partners than heterosexual women,4X more likely to have 50 or more male sexual partners in a life time. The average # of sexual partners in life time for heterosexual’s is 4, butfor a homosexual it is 50. The University of Chicago found monogamy in heterosexuals to be 83% but less than 2% in homosexuals.
          All laws legislate morality. Morality is about right and wrong and everylaw legally declares one behavior right and the opposite wrong. Desires do notconstitute rights. Just because you have the desire to do something, doesn’tmean you have the right to do it. Even among consenting adults, there is noright to prostitution, polygamy, adultery, or incest.
          It is unloving to enable or endorse destructive behavior. We can all ignore factsthat contradict our desires because desires overrule the mind when we want them to.This isn’t about rights. It’s about validating behavior that is destructive,against biology and evolution.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             Correlation does not equal causation. Most of these “harms” aren’t the result of homosexuality in and of itself, but the social stigma and rejection gays and lesbians face from others– alcohol and drug use, promiscuous behaviors that lead to STDs, etc. Your suggestion that bisexuals do not remain faithful to their spouses is particularly offensive. And next time, a link to your sources would be helpful.

        • Nekouken

          The entitlement, which you, as a right-wing Christian, are blind to, is that you should have the right to decide what arrangements other people make with their lives.  Jimmy wasn’t advocating democracy — certainly not a pure democracy, which, incidentally, neither does the Constitution — and has in fact repeatedly pointed out that rights are not something that should be left up to the democratic process.  If rights were democratically decided rather than recognized and protected by fiat, then nobody but white, landowning men would have the right to vote and slavery would still be legal.  So no, you didn’t destroy his argument.

    • WingedBeast

      I’m curious as to how being condemned in the bible invalidates any comparison?

      In previous civil rights movements, it was about the rights of an underpowered minority.  This doesn’t belittle anybody to note.  It only belittles people if you assume, much like racists did in the 50′s and 60′s, that the minority we’re currently focusing on is lesser.

    • Arynne

      You’ve posted this identical comment, exact same words, pretty much everywhere someone has mentioned gay civil rights. At least do the writers the courtesy of posting individual critiques and not spam.

  • Anonymous

    Interesting ideas. I think in 30-40 years “gay marriage” may be enacted as having the protections the US currently provides for marriage now, but it won’t be a mark of the US church growing to be more like Jesus.
    People of all faiths will continue to let their faith inform their politics, and that’s the way it should be, i.e. legitimate disagreements should be allowed to flourish. It looks the the Founders welcomed that when establishing the First Amendment’s right for people to practice freedom of religion. Many expressions of religion extend into the public square by necessity.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

      I agree that gay marriage will eventually make it as an option carved out by law. I also agree that some churches will not see this as “growing to be more like Jesus.” and will not perform or recognize such “marriages” (italicized since they wont consider them marriage). HOwever, there will be churches who marry gay people as they see fit to do so.

      This is good. Protecting and extending legal rights of passing of property, hospital visits and other advantages extended to couples who choose to unite—while not forcing religious institutions to compromise their beliefs.

      This really is a place where people need to practice their beliefs responsibly and consistently—NOT expecting others to adhere to a targeted set of personal beliefs. (meaning Christians aren’t targeting divorce, or obese people from getting married…who some Christians would seek to label as adulterers and gluttons)

      • http://www.facebook.com/jimmyspencerjr Jimmy Spencer Jr

        and thanks for engaging the topic with a sense of civility & respect!

  • Paul Svenson

    Good stuff Jimmy!  Logical, historical, clear, factual.  In other words those of us who agree hear you.  Those who are so blinded in their tunnel-vision perspective of their brand of christianity never will.  By the way – I’m quite certain that you can find pockets of christians in this country who still believe that Jim Crow-style segregation is right and god’s way.  Fortunately they are few and far between, and their children in this modern media society aren’t buying the “family line” as easily.  There’s hope there too!

    Thanks for this.

  • Paul Svenson

    Good stuff Jimmy!  Logical, historical, clear, factual.  In other words those of us who agree hear you.  Those who are so blinded in their tunnel-vision perspective of their brand of christianity never will.  By the way – I’m quite certain that you can find pockets of christians in this country who still believe that Jim Crow-style segregation is right and god’s way.  Fortunately they are few and far between, and their children in this modern media society aren’t buying the “family line” as easily.  There’s hope there too!

    Thanks for this.

  • Dennis

     Well written and convicting!   Nice work Jimmy S.

    • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

      Thanks man! Voices of encouragement are appreciated and do encourage me. Sometimes the voices I describe in the article feel if they shout loud enough that they can drag everyone down…

      and you know what…sometime its effective. So, thanks to voices like yours that balance that out and remind me to keep speaking truth with love.

  • Rfurco

    Some clarification? I get your point, but you are not saying that Jesus condones active homosexuality and doesnt see it as Romans 1 describes it?

    I truely get your political points, however it seems you are saying that Jesus is going to embrace everyone at His return: Saved, unsaved??

    You are not promoting a Jesus that wont someday say “depart from me you workers of iniquity” and sadly cammand them to be cast into eternal judgement??

    • Otro tierra

      Some clarification: Paul of Tarsus wrote that passage about idolatry and lust.

      As for Jesus–who is, literally, The Word—Jesus was quite public about his opposition to divorce.  

      • Rfurco

         The Bible is The WORD of God. You cant pick and choose what part is Gods Word and call yourself a Christian. The New Testament is very clear about the balance between Grace and an excuse for sinful living.

        • Otro tierra

          Further clarification, if you’re interested: Jesus is literally “The Word,” Paul of Tarsus is not, nor are passages in a letter or book. 

          Jesus saves, but a scripture or book itself does not—there is a difference. The former is truth, the latter is idolatry. See the difference?

        • Otro tierra

          Further clarification, if you’re interested: Jesus is literally “The Word,” Paul of Tarsus is not, nor are passages in a letter or book. 

          Jesus saves, but a scripture or book itself does not—there is a difference. The former is truth, the latter is idolatry. See the difference?

        • Otro tierra

          Further clarification, if you’re interested: Jesus is literally “The Word,” Paul of Tarsus is not, nor are passages in a letter or book. 

          Jesus saves, but a scripture or book itself does not—there is a difference. The former is truth, the latter is idolatry. See the difference?

          • Tatl_hutch

            Jesus is the “logos” is very true indeed. He is the embodiment and fulfillment of scripture. I see what you are trying to say here, but it is not the same point they are trying to raise.

            I do find it odd that Jesus never mentioned homosexuality in the midst of the Roman empire, but for the sake of argument, there was a lot he didn’t mentioned. True Paul gave us a brief snippets seemingly referring to homosexuality as a result of not following God, and their are roughly 4-6 other verses dealing with homosexuality. I wonder though if we look at it historically would we like to go back to the society that the early Jews lived in? Would we like to execute those who break one of Gods commands? Surely not, but why the intense interest on making this so. Is it not for God to judge and correct sin in our hearts? Do we not trust he can do it without our help?

          • Drew

            This is a point I have made before – Jesus spoke out against murder and sexual immorality, but not abortion and homosexuality.  I think using the rest of the Bible though, we get a clearer picture of what murder entails and what sexual immorality entails.

          • Arynne

            I fail to see how a relationship based on mutual love, passion, respect and commitment, between two adults who enter into it of their own free will, is “immorality”.

            I also fail to see how one human being could hold another as property, able to maim or kill them at whim…but St. Paul didn’t feel moved to condemn *that* relationship.

            This is the twenty-first century. We no longer subscribe to a belief system where slavery, and treating women and children as chattel, is acceptable. We’ve rejected the command for slaves to be obedient to their masters, for women to keep silent in church. Homophobia is another relic of the past that a living faith needs to let go of, like an outworn shirt, so that it may be clothed in spotless garments again.

          • Drew

            Whew… I thought you were going to dig deep into the Bible and change my mind… thank you for not challenging me like that : )

          • Arynne

            Very well — how *do* you reconcile absolute obedience to every word of the New Testament with its five separate endorsements of slavery?

          • Drew

            I don’t have time to educate the uneducated; however, I suggest you have a superficial view of the topic if you think the slavery of Biblical times was equivalent to U.S. slavery.  I suggest taking a harder look at the topic.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

            Please tell me you did not just imply that because Biblical slavery
            didn’t have a racial/ethnic motivation that made it acceptable. Please. /shakes head

      • Drew

        I see that you subscribe to false doctrine.  Too bad.

        Jesus was against sexual immorality, which includes homosexuality, as clarified by numerous Old Testament and New Testament passages.

        Jesus was against divorce, although there were some acceptable circumstances for it to happen.  However, the meme that because some look the other way on divorce, that we should look the other way on homosexuality, is an intellectually lazy and dishonest meme.  How about we stop redefining sin in general?

        • Otro tierra

          Jesus is, literally, The Word, and your trolling sophistry is not enough to convince me otherwise. 

          • Anonymous

             Drew can speak for himself (and I’d prefer he does)…but I will attest that he is no troll.

            I saw your reply to me as well. It is essentially meaningless.

            Maybe you do believe false doctrine after all.

          • Drew

            I like being called a troll because it means the person is a noob.

          • http://www.facebook.com/chrisalgoo Chris Algoo

            It’s a good thing you possess Real True Christianity then *snerk*

          • Drew

            I love being called a troll, because it means you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.  If you have been on this website for longer than a week you would realize I am not a troll.  However, if it makes you feel better to write me off because you think I am a troll, then do so.

            It’s interesting that not only did you misunderstand what I wrote, but you did not even reply to most of what I wrote.  I was not disagreeing that Jesus is the Word; I was disagreeing that the passage was only about idolatry and lust.

      • Anonymous

        Before I conclude that I agree with Drew’s reply, can you explain this?
        In your last reply to Rfurco, you said “Jesus saves”. That is a doctrinal claim, also written by Paul, in the same letter to the Romans. What is the criteria that makes part of that letter acceptable but another part not?

        • Otro tierra

          Jesus is, literally, The Word. I’m sorry that you have a problem with this.

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    Just a reminder: THIS ARTICLE IS NOT ABOUT BEING GAY. It is about our sense of entitlement as a Christians to expect people very different from us to live by our brand of Christian values.

    Look in the mirror and ask yourself—do I expect other U.S citizens to act like Christians—even if they are not? 

    • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

       i love this– if we, as Christians can’t even agree on what it means to “act Christian”, how can we expect nonChristians to “act Christian”?

      • Otro tierra

        Amen, Ally. Putting Jesus first is not easy, but it is possible. 

      • Anonymous

        Millions of people have been killed because Christians cannot agree.  That was one reason for separation of church and state.  The main ones were the Spanish Inquisition, the 80 Years’ War in Holland, the 30 Years’ War, the English Civil war, and the Martyrs’ Mirror (where BOTH Calvinists and Catholics in Switzerland tortured and executed my Anabaptist ancestors).  That is why I say and Barack Obama says, if America is a Christian nation, whose version of Christianity – there are over 2000 brands.

    • Getrankin

      the best part of articles like this is it shows the growing numbers of false teachers who are spreading a universalist view of Christianity, and thus proving that the return of Christ is much closer than you think. you can argue whatever you want but th REAL truth is that every acceptance of sin in this world brings us one step closer to the Father’s return. so all you liars keep it up and bring on the end of this world, Jesus!

      • Drew

        I wouldn’t say they are liars, implying that they know what is right but promote what is wrong.  I think they are honest – perhaps wrong – but honest… I am not questioning their integrity.

        • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

          My point exactly. Now try to understand that I (and most inclusive oriented people) see you the exact same way.

          Two sides of same coin. That is why Jesus says “love your neighbor”…not prove your right to your neighbor.

          • Drew

            I didn’t know that there was an exclusive inclusive club.  But I digress.

            I don’t think it is two sides of the same coin.  There are many honest and heartfelt and intelligent Atheists out there.  Would I call them liars?  No.  Would I say it’s two sides of the same coin?  Of course not – someone is right and someone is wrong – both people are not right at the same time, no matter how honest or heartfelt.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            I guess I’ll go thru life proving I’m loving to people and you can go thru life proving your right to people…and in the end we’ll see who Jesus commends.

            I’m perfectly fine with that.

          • Drew

            I’m fine with that as well.  After all, false prophets come in sheep’s clothing, not wolves’ clothing.

          • Frank

            Its not love encourage sin.

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    How would you feel if the majority of citizens got fed up with Conservative Christians passing laws based on the conservative view of the Bible… and they began to make it ILLEGAL for self professing Calvinists, or Catholics to get married?

    What we sow as a majority is likely what we’ll reap as a minority. 

    • Drew

      Jimmy,

      Such a law would not prevent me from living with my wife nor having my marriage recognized by my Church or from having a ceremony; the only thing I would miss out on are the benefits of having a state-sanctioned marriage.

      That being said, I largely support civil unions so that gay and lesbian folks can have the same benefits.

      • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

        I believe this is the middle ground that Tony has helped carve out and will become a place that is fair for both church and state concerns. 

        • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

          Actually Drew you didn’t answer my question: “How would you feel?” 

          Would you feel loved (that is what we tell most people we discriminate against..that we’re telling them truth because we ‘love’ them!

          Would you perhaps feel discriminated against?

          • Drew

            I would want to know why; I would be curious, I suppose. 

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            and what if they replied it was because you held unbiblical views, that your views on Calvinism were clearly false teaching (which I strongly believe they actually are).

            would you concede that you are unbiblical and deserving of being discriminated against because of your false system of knowledge???

            Seriously, I cant image you would concede that.

          • Drew

            If the Bible said it, then I would have to consider it, sure.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             …maybe i’m cynical, but i don’t think so.

            To continue the example, you understand that both Calvinists and Arminians use Biblical passages to bolster their arguments. So do universalists. And so do those of us who don’t believe homosexuality is a sin. Yes, there are a handful of verses that appear to condemn homosexuality but there are a handful of verses that seem to suggest homosexual relationships– and there are more than a handful that suggest we’re not to judge, that we’re to love others, that God cares more about the way we treat others than whether we have the “correct” theology or doctrine.

            So if you, in this example, were Calvinist and were told it was a sin to be Calvinist and that you held to false teaching… i rather doubt that you’d just be like, “Yeah ok, you’re right– my beliefs are wrong.” You’d show us biblical support for your beliefs, you might even take a more academic approach to why you hold these beliefs. You would, in essence, do as we “liberals” have done in this post.

          • Drew

            It looks like you are just looking to pick fights.  Look at what I said carefully – I said “I would have to consider it.”  I never said I would accept it, just that I would not be close-minded enough to automatically reject something.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

            If i misunderstood you, then i apologize.

            However, given that others have given Scriptural support for their beliefs and
            you haven’t shown any inclination to (re)consider these perspectives, i felt it
            curious that in this hypothetical situation, you said you would consider an “alternate”
            view- and that is what i was trying to point out in my comment.

             

            Again, if i misunderstood your intentions, i apologize.
             

          • Drew

            Likewise, I apologize if my reasoning seems flippant rather than thought-out.  Hard to go into a lot of details on blog comments.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            conversely I cant imagine that those you interpreted as wrong in their understanding of bible verses will concede that you have judged them correctly?

          • Drew

            That makes no sense; not sure what you are trying to say here.

          • Drew

            That makes no sense; not sure what you are trying to say here.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            I’m saying that just because I’m not over at Mark Driscoll’s blog or website blasting his theology does NOT mean that I am don’t consider his systemic theology based on Calvin to be correct. I think Calvinism is the most DANGEROUS AND DAMAGING thing ever released into Christianity…

            But I’m not spending my time running around  trying to convince him he’s wrong.

            I’m saying you have an INTERPRETATION of the Bible and others have an INTERPRETATION of the BIble and you BOTH think your right…that is why GRACE is required in such matters.

            Because just like you really, really “know” being gay is unbiblical…I really, really “know” that Calvinism is unbiblical.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            …and with ALL that said I believe that Calvinists are good-hearted peopel doing their very best to understand Jesus…and I do my best to be loving toward them.

            OK. Goodnight. Thanks for the civil converstation in this thread here.

          • Drew

            Hey Jimmy,

            This website is “Red Letter Christian,” founded by Tony Campolo, an Evangelical that believes that homosexuality (the act) is a sin.  You do recognize this, correct?  Since I am an Evangelical, and since I share many of the same views as Tony, I am on this blog.  You are actually the one that is bringing in views contrary to Tony and to Evangelicals.

            You can type in caps and yell and get as angry as you want; I will never type in caps back at you or get angry at you.  It’s respect and common courtesy and love.

            By the way, although I mentioned I find myself to be agreement with Driscoll in some areas, I made it clear I am not a part of his denomination or Church.  I belong to a different denomination in a different state.

          • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

            Nobody is angry…hahaha.

            Yes I do realize this is Tony’s website and am well versed in the Red Letter values.

            You completely missing the point.
             The point is there is zero difference the between attitude the two positions.you are the exactly the same.

  • http://www.facebook.com/chrisalgoo Chris Algoo

    Great article! The comments section shows the continued work that needs to be done.

    • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

      thanks man…appreciate the support and whole-heartedly agree with your assessment :)

    • Frank

      The problem is your trying to work against God. A losing proposition every time.

      • Otro tierra

        How is Chris trying to work against God? Please show us, Frank. 

      • Otro tierra

        How is Chris trying to work against God? Please show us, Frank. 

  • Anonymous

    Millions of people have been killed because Christians cannot agree.  That was one reason for separation of church and state.  The main ones were the Spanish Inquisition, the 80 Years’ War in Holland, the 30 Years’ War, the English Civil war, and the Martyrs’ Mirror (where BOTH Calvinists and Catholics in Switzerland tortured and executed my Anabaptist ancestors).  That is why I say and Barack Obama says, if America is a Christian nation, whose version of Christianity – there are over 2000 brands.

    • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

      Agreed 100% !! People of faith (any faith) should not be passing laws that require people of not of their faith—to be force to obey their religion’s principles. 

  • Spencer

    so good jimmy.  i do feel for the trolls though – “trapped in proving that we are right”

  • Scott

    Though I think the Christian Right is too harsh on this and other topics, I think there is a trend in the Church towards relativism in the name of love.  I don’t consider homosexuality to be any worse than arrogance, selfishness, anger, gluttony, pornography, premarital sex, and on and on.  The issue is that once again the church is being asked to lower God’s standards so we can reach them by ourselves without need of a Savior.  Christians as members of a society can vote their values at the polls without being hateful or discriminatory.  However, it is the hateful and fearful ones who are poorly representing the name of Christ and causing people to the rush to the other side of the boat rocking it even more violently.  Let’s instead seek an extreme balance of love and truth. —–a radical moderate ——-

  • Drew

    Ally,

    I don’t have enough time to educate you on areas of scripture you do not understand, such as slavery in Bible times and how it is different from the American concept of slavery, and how homosexuality is a sin.  I suggest talking to a pastor from a Bible-centric Church that can inform you.  True knowledge is better than worshiping at the alter of political liberalism or conservatism.

    • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

      Of all the asinine responses i’ve been given over the internet, i believe this may be the worst yet. You do not have time to educate me? Educate. And what, pray tell, credentials do you possess that you might be able to “educate” me? Not that i need to defend myself or my views to you any further but just so you know, my father and brother are both pastors at “Bible-centric” churches. Believe me, i know my way around the Scriptures. In fact, in my earlier comment, i did allude to major difference of biblical and American slavery: one did not have racial/ethnic motivations, the other did. Just because my own study of the Bible has led me to different interpretations than you does not mean i do need to be “educated”.

      @Jimmy- this was a great piece. Thank you.

      • Drew

        As I said, I do not have time to educate.  I wish you well, and if you are not an Evangelical, I have to ask why you are posting on an Evangelical website.  Not that I mind, but you seem to mind quite a bit that your heretical beliefs are being challenged.

        • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

           i’ve said all i can say to you, so this will be my final reply.

          i do not consider myself Evangelical, but i did grow up within Evangelical Christianity- as i said, my father is an Evangelical (Quaker) pastor. i read RLC and contribute from time to time because it represents a progressive movement within (Evangelical) Christianity. If we were to all lay our theological and political cards on the table, i’m sure it would surprise you to see the diversity among those who contribute, read, and comment on RLC. Further, i’ve always been of the opinion that one ought to associate only with whom one agrees– i believe we stand to learn the most from those with whom one doesn’t agree. i do not mind a challenge to my beliefs, though observation suggests that you mind a challenge to your beliefs. Again, i’d like to ask why you feel a need to denigrate those who are not of the same theological or political persuasion as you?

          i’d also like to wish you well… may you go with God.

          • Drew

            “i do not consider myself Evangelical”

            Fair enough – I surmised as much.

      • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

        Ally,

        Thanks for your kind words. 

        • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

           You’re welcome, Jimmy.

          Essays such as yours give me hope that even i can still find a place in the Church, so thank you.

  • OWCP Lawyer

    Using Drew’s line of logic, one could easily argue that modern same-sex relationships are as different from the Greco-Roman pederasty that drew Paul’s ire as slavery in ancient Rome was different from American race-based slavery.

    That is, of course, if you accept the premise that slavery is compatible with Christianity to begin with. Which Drew apparently does.

    • Drew

      Unfortunately, I don’t have time to educate you either.  I wish you well.

    • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

      PLEASE ignore Drew :)

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    I think it is time the RLC Editor did something about folks who troll and bully Progressive Evangelicals on our website.

    • Frank

      Yes by all means irradicate dissenting views so at least you can “feel” right.

      • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

        i’m sure you know this, but his suggestion isn’t so we can eradicate other views, it’s to provide a safe place for civil discourse. Much of this “discussion” has been anything but civil- personal attacks have no place in any conversation. Civil discourse is possible, even with such “hot-topic” issues as this.

        • Frank

          Ok but who gets to define who is a troll and by what criteria? I see no trolls here. I am the closest thing to a troll in this discussion.

      • Drew

        It’s kind of ironic that non-Evangelicals post articles on an Evangelical website, than ask that dissenting views are crushed.  Such are the times we live in though.  Progressive and liberalism is tolerant, except if you do not agree with them, then “let them eat cake” and try to get them banned.

        • Jennifer A. Nolan

          You have been so busy saying that your interpretation is right, and theirs are wrong, that they need “educating” and so on, that the only conclusion for them to reach is that you ARE a troll. Also a Pharisee, a know-it-all, and a bully. This whole gay-marriage business may very well blow up in its practitioners’ faces; if it does, it won’t be because “God hates fags,” but for a variety of socio-cultural reasons that will be neither blessings nor curses, on anyone, from the Guy Upstairs. OTOH, He will have some choice words for the rigid and uncharitable, come the Day of Judgment. Much of the thunder in the ears of people like you will be about some 250,000 homosexual men who perished in the Nazi Holocaust, along with those 6,000,000 perfidious Jews.

          I have no horse in this race; my orienation is somewhere in the middle. But I would just as soon keep my outlook open and charitable; it just looks more like real obedience to the Messiah who said “Love your neighbor.”

          • Otro tierra

            Thank you, Jennifer, for your thoughtful and pointed response. Indeed, the Sanhedrin is alive and well in the U.S. 

            Putting Jesus and the Greatest Commandment first is not easy, but it is possible. 

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            Thank you for your message of support. I predict tough times ahead with these Bible-thumping bullies.

            ________________________________
            From: Disqus
            To: jennifernolan48@yahoo.com
            Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:10 PM
            Subject: [redletterchristians] Re: Let Them Eat Cake

            Disqus generic email template

            Otro tierra (unregistered) wrote, in response to Jennifer A. Nolan: Thank you, Jennifer, for your thoughtful and pointed response. Indeed, the Sanhedrin is alive and well in the U.S.
            Putting Jesus and the Greatest Commandment first is not easy, but it is possible. Link to comment

          • Anonymous

            Otro Tierra,
            Keep in mind you’re not above the fray yourself when you commend a post that has ad hominem attacks.
            Furthermore, since you’re not in the United States, your comment here sounds nasty & malicious. People don’t come on this blog and bash the country you’re in, so you’d be well advised to do the same. Maybe you should go offline & practice loving your neighbor, since you appear to believe in it so strongly.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             And you know Otro Tierra is not from the US… how??

          • Drew

            Considering my grandfather was a WWII hero and that I was born in the ’80s, I don’t think my family or I will be held accountable for the Holocaust, but I appreciate the concern.

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            You “don’t think…” Just remember, our people let that happen, to the gays and the Jews alike. We’re still not sorry; that’s our problem. The speck in that homo boy’s eye (whichever one you’re picking on now) is as nothing next to the broad beam in the eye of someone who doesn’t think he will be “held accountable” for his pro-bully, hateful attitudes. The call is to repentance, and Jesus never said it about gay sex.

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            You “don’t think…” Just remember, our people let that happen, to the gays and the Jews alike. We’re still not sorry; that’s our problem. The speck in that homo boy’s eye (whichever one you’re picking on now) is as nothing next to the broad beam in the eye of someone who doesn’t think he will be “held accountable” for his pro-bully, hateful attitudes. The call is to repentance, and Jesus never said it about gay sex.

          • Drew

            I honestly have no idea what you are talking about.  However, if you think I will be accountable for things I have not done and have not taken a part in, while people will not be accountable for things that they have actually done, that is an interesting use of logic.

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            It’s the same logic used by Jews to hold young, modern Germans responsible for how seriously THEY take the Holocaust. As every Jew with a brain in their head knows, hatred, indifference, and defensiveness pile up and pile up over the generations, leading ultimately to massive crimes for which huge numbers of people, far beyond the directly-involved, must share the guilt.

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            You “don’t think…” Just remember, our people let that happen, to the gays and the Jews alike. We’re still not sorry; that’s our problem. The speck in that homo boy’s eye (whichever one you’re picking on now) is as nothing next to the broad beam in the eye of someone who doesn’t think he will be “held accountable” for his pro-bully, hateful attitudes. The call is to repentance, and Jesus never said it about gay sex.

          • Jennifer A. Nolan

            You “don’t think…” Just remember, our people let that happen, to the gays and the Jews alike. We’re still not sorry; that’s our problem. The speck in that homo boy’s eye (whichever one you’re picking on now) is as nothing next to the broad beam in the eye of someone who doesn’t think he will be “held accountable” for his pro-bully, hateful attitudes. The call is to repentance, and Jesus never said it about gay sex.

    • Drew

      Jimmy,

      Jennifer seems to think I am responsible for the death of the Jews and homosexuals in the Holocaust.  If you want to start somewhere with trolling and bullying, let’s start here, shall we?

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    When I intentionally posted that the editor needed restrict who is allowed use of the comment system I had a sneaky suspicion this would happen:

    The people on this comment section who feel so entitled (using God as an excuse) to deny others serious liberties are the FIRST to cry foul when the slightest hint is made to denying them the “right” to be rude and uncivil. 

    …and that is the WHOLE point of the article!this article is not about gay people or anyone else…it’s about the blind & hypocritical entitlement some in this country operate with.

    • Otro tierra

      Thank you Jimmy Spencer for your powerful, challenging article. And many thanks for engaging with readers. I too hope the RLC Editors will take a stand against clownish trolling behavior in the comments sections. 

      Jesus didn’t toy with mean-spirited bullying sophistry, and neither should we. 

    • Otro tierra

      Thank you Jimmy Spencer for your powerful, challenging article. And many thanks for engaging with readers. I too hope the RLC Editors will take a stand against clownish trolling behavior in the comments sections. 

      Jesus didn’t toy with mean-spirited bullying sophistry, and neither should we. 

      • Drew

        Jennifer seems to think I am responsible for the death of the Jews
        and homosexuals in the Holocaust.  If you want to start somewhere with
        trolling and bullying, let’s start here, shall we?

    • Drew

      When you write an article about being inclusive, then turn around and discuss how to exclude people who do not agree with you, you have climbed Mt. Hypocrisy to the pinnacle.

      • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

         Sooo… you think anyone should be able to say anything they want with no consideration to whether it attacks others or is otherwise rude and uncivil?

        • Drew

          I was asking Jimmy a question, so I will let him respond, if he would like.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             ”When you write an article about being inclusive, then turn around and
            discuss how to exclude people who do not agree with you, you have
            climbed Mt. Hypocrisy to the pinnacle.”

            i don’t see a question in this statement- what i see is yet another attack on someone who doesn’t agree with you.

            Like Jimmy, i’ve said all i can in this conversation– and, as it’s been made clear to me, as a non-evangelical (let alone non-heterosexual), i don’t have a place at this “table”. i do wish y’all the best.

            Jimmy, again, thank you for the courage to speak out on this issue.

          • Otro tierra

            Ally C: Thank you for sharing your experiences with us. Jesus didn’t tolerate mean-spirited bullying attacks, and neither should we. I look forward to your future posts here at RLC. 

          • Drew

            Once again, I replied to Jimmy, not to you.

          • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

             So, no one but Jimmy (who has left hte conversation) is allowed to reply to what you said [to Jimmy]? Please clarify this for me.

    • http://ricbooth.wordpress.com Ric

      Brilliant. I was puzzled as to your motives with that. Excellent article, that I missed until now.

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    …and with that said I’ll be leaving the conversation. Thanks to everyone who was civil and acted like Jesus, let us all continue to love all our neighbors and remember that it really, really is that simple. Chose to love without agenda :)

    Thanks everyone!

    • Drew

      Even though you were very angry towards me, yelling at me in caps and telling people to ignore me, and even though your supporters like Jennifer Nolan said I was responsible for the Holocaust, I did enjoy the conversation (when it was an actual conversation and not just people looking for a fight every time I posted).  After all, I probably agree with you in more areas than I disagree.  That’s why I am on this website – I have no blogs, books, or events to promote – just a guy that loves God and agrees with a lot of views of Mr. Campolo.

    • Drew

      Even though you were very angry towards me, yelling at me in caps and telling people to ignore me, and even though your supporters like Jennifer Nolan said I was responsible for the Holocaust, I did enjoy the conversation (when it was an actual conversation and not just people looking for a fight every time I posted).  After all, I probably agree with you in more areas than I disagree.  That’s why I am on this website – I have no blogs, books, or events to promote – just a guy that loves God and agrees with a lot of views of Mr. Campolo.

  • http://www.jimmyspencerjr.com/ Jimmy Spencer Jr

    This didn’t post for some reason earlier (so I’ll repost it)
    Frank said: “Ok but who gets to define who is a troll and by what criteria? I see no trolls here. I am the closest thing to a troll in this discussion.”  I understand your concern and please see that the rest of the country takes issue when conservative christians feel entitled to play judge for everyone else based on their particular interpretation of the Bible

    • Otro tierra

      Indeed, Jesus faced the mean-spirited and spiritually corrupt during his day. We should accept Jesus—not his opposition—as our example.

      • Frank

        There is nothing mean spirited or corrupt about upholding Gods design. In fact what’s mean spirited and corrupt is to support sinful behavior like homosexual behavior.

        That’s the problem with deception, black is white and white is black.

        • Drew

          Frank,

          Unfortunately, most of the people who now post on RLC are not Evangelicals but are Mainline Protestants. Unfortunately, most Mainline Protestant Churches have succumbed to secular liberalism – no surprise why the numbers of attendance and giving are dropping like a rock in these Churches. Once you start rewriting and reinterpreting parts of the Bible you don’t like to satisfy secular liberalism, you start doing that to all parts of the Bible. It’s not just homosexuality – it’s a fear of Evangelism, it’s accepting that there are other ways to God besides Jesus, it’s an emphasis on works without faith (odd how Jimmy’s non-profit that he draws a salary from is not faith-based; doing good works and not glorifying God). Pretty soon the Bible looks like the DNC platform. Luckily there is a growth in Evangelical and Bible-believing Churches that refuse to compromise the faith in an increasingly secular, atheist, and non-Christian world.

  • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

    To Drew:

    In regard to your previous comments about comment moderation:

    Do you believe anyone should be able to say anything they want with no
    consideration to whether it attacks others or is otherwise rude and
    uncivil?

    • Drew

      This is so far removed from the original topic that I am not going to answer the question.  Have a good day.

      • http://aredemptionofhope.blogspot.com Ally C

         Hahaha… and why this doesn’t surprise me? Perhaps because of your staunch refusal to answer any direct question about your comments on this thread. Any time anyone had the guts to call you out on rude comments, your response was to either ignore them, or cry out as the victim of an evil liberal agenda. Ridiculous.

        • Drew

          Ally,

          I will pray for you.  Have a good day.

  • Miley_Outsider

    Thank you for sharing your perspective on this very difficult and complex subject. I dont pretend to know which view is “right.” Clearly your central point that we are called to love our neighbor is true. At the same time, I’ve heard support for the view that America was founded on Christian values and that although we don’t force being a Christian on anyone, we have a right to defend the foundational beliefs that made our country great….a country that God has clearly blessed. Can we deny that God abhored homosexuality? Is the issue that God only judges against it if it is committed by Christians and therefore non-Christians cannot be subjected to our moral code? Where do we draw the line with legislating morals? Consenting adult siblings who want to marry. Do we have a right to say that’s just wrong and going to far? Too far for whom? Is it merely the vast majority that decides based on how comfortable or desensitized they’ve become? As you can see, I dont have the answers, just more questions. But i do appreciate your perspective, and the heart from which it comes, very much.

×

TRENDING: Remember Guantanamo Bay? Day 102 of the Hunger Strike >>