Progressive Christianity Is As Broken As Evangelicalism: Here’s How to Fix It

Progressive Christianity Is Broken

I don’t think there will be some new age of religion dawning in America anytime soon unless a lot of people change their minds about worship. The dream of progressive Christians whether they call themselves “emergent” or something else will fizzle along with the slowly collapsing evangelical/fundamentalist juggernaut unless the basic mistakes of North American Christianity are addressed.

We can talk about inclusiveness, diversity and making ourselves vulnerable until the cows come home but that doesn’t make religion more interesting or Christianity stronger it simply changes the labels and the shorthand jargon we talk to ourselves in.

The problem with North American Christianity is not the window-dressing– it’s the whole package.

The great weakness of Protestant American Christianity across the board is that by and large it dispensed with liturgy. Having dispensed with liturgy it dispensed with the signposts that point people toward an identity that binds communities together. American Christians have just never admitted it to themselves but the issue is not truth or salvation. For most people who go to church the issue is about community. And community doesn’t work any better than team sports work unless everyone’s wearing the same uniform on your team.

Related: A Dialogue on What It Means to be Pro-Life — by Tony Campolo and Shane Claiborne

In terms of the practice of Christianity this “uniform” has always been faithfulness to the ancient Eucharistic tradition of Christianity far more than it’s been about creeds of correct belief. Showing up was the deal, not sincerity. The point is there had to be something to show up for that was different than the rest of your life, special, set apart. Otherwise why bother?

In the past Christians were bound together and had a center-point to concentrate on not so much by signing on to belief but by the doing of Christianity. And this “doing” was recognizable and passed down through the ages from grandmother to granddaughter in a form that was as familiar as the shape of the mountains are to someone who grows up in an Alpine village.

People knew what church was not what they were supposed to believe.

The unity came through shared practice and tradition. A funeral always looked like a funeral. A wedding always looked like a wedding. Communion, not sermons ruled the day. It was a matter of heart, not head, practice not content. Sure the priest mumbled stuff but the point was you showed up and it was always reassuringly the same. It was to worship what the Manhattan skyline is to born and bred New Yorkers: home.

Generations of Christians through millennia would have been flabbergasted at the make-it-up-as-you-go-along aspect of modern Christianity that cuts across both fundamentalist and progressive denominations. It would have been as if they had returned from the grave to find all the names of towns, rivers and mountains had been changed and in fact more than that, the landscape itself was bulldozed into an unrecognizable flat desert. It would be like pointing to the Las Vegas “New York” and trying to get someone who grew up on the Upper West Side to believe that this fake stage set was the real deal.

It’s no wonder then that a generation of evangelicals and disgruntled fundamentalists wandering away from evangelical communities have zero idea about what to actually “do” in terms of worship and practice when they start up their own churches as a counterpoint to the bad experiences they suffered through in times past. They may think that they are rebelling against the straitjacket of right wing fundamentalist “culture war” Christianity, but in fact they’re just simply continuing it by other means. The sign posts are still gone. They are still in a head game of ideas about God, not in the world of worship of God. Until forward thinking Christians are willing to look back at what’s been lost no one is going to be able to get anywhere past just being another fad.

What’s been lost is the doing of Christianity.

When progressive Christians, whatever they call themselves, return to the Eucharistic path, the traditional calendar of the Christian year, a sense that a church is not a temple of what’s-happening-now with all the latest attachments but something that was passed down to them, they’ll then be able to pick up where their Puritan forebears went wrong.

The problem is not so much theological as it is practical. While evangelicals argue about the “inerrancy of Scripture” their churches look like everything else in the culture, be it in the music or “nontraditional” spaces. And they get what they pay for: about the same loyalty to their brand as people have to box stores.

All the markers and familiar signposts have been removed so who cares what the preacher is saying or what some half-assed band is playing?

When progressive Christians invent “new” forms of worship they simply dodge one bullet to take another one square between the eyes.

Here’s what’s actually needed:

  • Mystery and open-mindedness when it comes to theological content: uncertainty is good
  • Rediscovery of Eucharistic sacramental tradition when it comes to forms of worship
  • Seeking out the old, the mystical and the monastic as a path to inner stillness
  • Abandoning trying to be “modern” in favor of tapping back into the root and branch of worship
  • Upholding the expanded ever-growing New Testament principle of freedom and a non-retributive gospel of inclusion by welcoming gays, women and minorities to leadership positions
  • Rediscovering and holding firmly to forms of traditional worship that gave Christian bodies our “team uniform” around which to coalesce and build the identity of lasting safe community.

In other words we need to rediscover and return to what never was broken but was stupidly abandoned by “freethinking” evangelical denominations, the Puritans rebelling against kings and bishops, and reclaim the forms of worship where the rough edges have been worn smooth by millennia of usage. We need to use them again not because they will save us or are the “only” way (they aren’t) but because they work!

Also by Frank: Mass Killing is our Idea of Patriotism

Two thousand years of history just said “Amen!”

We need to do this at the same time as we lay aside the hatred, culture wars, homophobia, misogyny and all the rest of the conservative judgmental package that comes hotfoot from the hell of the twisted theology of retribution “atonement” and sacrifice.

If we believe in the Jesus who did not come to “die for us” but rather to liberate us to find our true selves in others and yet — at the same time — build communities around ancient worship practices that would be recognizable to any other Christian in history, we’ll be on to something.


Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back. To book Frank Schaeffer to speak at your college, church or group contact him at Frankschaeffer.com

Print Friendly

  • http://jennyrain.com/ JennyRain

    This is truly like honey to my soul as I have been searching out a place where I can rediscover my awe of God in a community that is moving together towards wholeness, health, and the ability to actually make a dent in some of the injustices and ferocity of the world around us… like we are supposed to as Christians. What our communities of the faithful could look like both inside the church and outside in the world if we could rediscover what you are talking about here…

  • http://www.facebook.com/sherrywm Sherry Workman Marshall

    I think there is an in-between. The tradition as a connection to the past but not the end all be all. And more so, some hang salvation on which traditional action you partake in not in the freely given grace of asking and receiving. Its not about how many communions I take, or if I got sprinkled as a baby or dunked as an adult, or if I fast for Lent. Those actions are not what causes me to be born again, the grace that is granted me makes those things meaningful not the other way around. Offer tradition if you want it but do not fool people into thinking if they just do the motions everything is taken care of spiritually.

  • 22044

    Many expressions of Christianity in North America are doing great. Granted, things could be better and need to improve, but God loves His church.
    In Asia & Africa, people are responding in droves to the gospel and crossing from death to life. The churches there probably have some lessons we can learn as well.

    • Frank

      Exactly. The church that upholds its beliefs and does not succumb to culture will survive. Whats most interesting, traditional Christianity and traditional beliefs (pro-life, heterosexual marriage, unabashed evangelism) is seeing explosive growth in Asia and Africa as well as South America. Francis’ “solution” is just another path towards death.

      The best thing we can do as as Christians and the church is hold tightly to the doctrines of our faith and not succumb to anyone who thinks it needs fixing. Whats happening is simply separating the wheat from the chaff.

      • 22044

        Yes sir!
        Also allow me to gratuitously shout out again my appreciation for Frank’s dad – I watched his videos and read his book many years ago and those resources taught me that you can be a Christian and intellectually curious.
        Thanks Francis!

      • Aaaaaaaaaaaargh

        Frank, the negative flip side of what you’re sharing about Christian growth in Asia, Africa, and South America is that the Christian messages which seem to have the most popular traction there tend to equate faith with health, success, and riches. This is a poisonous “gospel” which will lead to personal disappointment. More damaging, it is basically a repudiation of Jesus’ real message. I feel much less triumphant about this acclamation by the masses.

        • 22044

          Huh?
          In many of the regions in those parts of the world, most people live in great poverty. They have to work &/or pray for each day’s provision and will likely never achieve any kind of wordly success. They have to lean on God as a matter of survival; that kind of relationship is a necessity!
          But I agree that it is tragic that the Word/Faith/prosperity movement has gone international as well. Makes me sad.

  • yada yada

    This is just another “everybody should be like me” prescription. The writer likes tradition and finds it rich and meaningful, therefore EVERYONE should like tradition and find it rich and meaningful.

  • Veronica Zundel

    I hear what you’re saying, and it has a lot of value, but part of the problem is that the ancient liturgies were written by ancient men and are inherently reflective of their limited perspective. The creeds are the worst, with what Mennonite leader Eleanor Kreider calls ‘a Jesus-shaped hole’ in the middle when we go straight from ‘born of the Virgin Mary’ to ‘suffered under Pontius Pilate’, missing out the entire ministry and teaching of Jesus, as if all he came to do was die. Creeds without the Jesus of the Gospels in them cannot possibly inform an inclusive and egalitarian praxis, because we miss his whole role as an incarnated example of God’s concerns for justice and peace.

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.knight.33 Thomas Knight

    you say ‘People knew what church was not what they were supposed to believe.’ but surely they were saved by their faith not membership of a church (Rom 3:28)

  • ritaccojimmy@yahoo.com

    You had me until you used “inappropriate” language.
    It makes your statement as “progressive” as the rest of these “emergents” that have lost their way and abandoned TRUE, SET APART, REVERENT, WORSHIP. No different than those that have gone to PERFORMANCE BASED ROCK CONCERTS that they call worship.
    The context of Paul becoming all things to save the more had nothing to do with being anything that he wasn’t already. At no time did he compromise to save or attract any!

    Those looking for the Lord ought to know that they are about to come to SOME PLACE DIFFERENT!

    Shame on you for lowering yourself with inappropriate language to get across a point!

    SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU!!

    • http://snommelp.tumblr.com/ Snommelp

      It always amazes me when people get so hung up on “inappropriate” language. You agree with everything Frank had to say, but because he dared to say “ass” once, suddenly he is deserving of nothing but shame and scorn?

      Paul also swore – it’s prettied up in the English translations, so you may have missed it. Philippians 3:8 “What is more, I consider everything a loss compared to the surpassing greatness of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things. I consider them rubbish [σκύβαλα - vulgar; translation: dung, refuse, shit], that I may gain Christ….”

  • http://www.facebook.com/larry.riedinger.9 Larry Riedinger

    A thinly veiled pro-Catholic anti-Protestant – pseudo-intellectual rant – with a cover of some sound ideas, especially about liturgy as symbol of life and mystery.

    Trouble is he is still the same “angry young man” he was back in the ’80s. I find his blatant stereotypical use of “progressive” to strongly imply a political agenda more than a spiritual one – intended to appeal those who are ignorant of church history and/or are biblically illiterate..

    Just as I recall his dad’s films – smug, intellectually self-righteous, and emotionally dismissive of the realities of human life. A condescending call for us mere mortals – to climb up to his lofty spiritual perspective. Straight from Cult Leadership 101….

    On the positive side, he may have rejected the Religious Right’s Prosperity Gospel!

  • Aaaaaaaaaaargh

    I’m sympathetic to this, but in general it’s far too simplistic, failing to acknowledge the real abuses and problems in the institutional church that the early Protestants and Anabaptists so correctly identified. I echo the critique of creeds shared by Veronica Zundel below. Sure, let’s return to “what never was broken,” but the problem is that no liturgical church today (in my admittedly limited experience) has managed to hold on to the good stuff of the liturgy without also carrying a good deal of dead, and in some cases rotting or festering, weight along with it. Not that I’m saying emergent/mainline/evangelical churches don’t also have a good deal of that garbage themselves.

    Love ya Frank (and loved “Crazy for God”), but we all know you’re a polemicist and nuance doesn’t work well in that approach.

  • Larry N

    I agree with the previous comment that Frank seems to have fallen into the trap that everybody thinks like him, and therefore everyone should like what he likes and find meaning in what he finds meaning in. The whole article just sounds like an old man pining for the “good ‘ol days.” I don’t think many people today would relate to ancient European styles of worship. Note the Pope even recognizes this by using Italian instead of Latin when giving the mass.

×

TRENDING: The Biblical Definition of Marriage and its Relevance to Marriage Equality>>