Rethinking the Roman Road: Paul’s gospel and violence

sale viagra

ual-Laws-300×200.jpg” alt=”" width=”270″ height=”180″ />When I was a teenager I learned to present the gospel using the “Four spiritual laws” tracts. This begins with a quote from Romans 3:23 “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” From there we would then proceed to try and convince our audience that even if they had only committed the most trivial and harmless of sins, because God is holy, they were nevertheless headed for eternal hell unless they gave their heart to Jesus right on the spot.

The result was that rather than addressing a problem or need in people’s lives, the focus was shifted to a problem God supposedly had. Or to put it differently: We had to convince them that they had a problem they didn’t know they had, so we could solve it for them. They were all perfectly content in their lives, but our message was that God was some kind of hyper-legalist who was super mad, and would torture them in hell for all eternity for the most minor infraction. That was our “good news.”

Even as a teen, it seemed odd to me that God seemed to be the one with the problem, rather than us. Looking back, I think part of the difficulty was that I was simply unaware of the actual extent of sin. So rather than address real problems, we focused on minor transgressions, as if that was what God was concerned about. As I’ve grown older, I’ve learned a lot more about myself, other people, and what really goes on in our world.

Watch the news, and you will see story after story of terrible injustice, violence, and suffering throughout the world. But you don’t need to travel across the world to find this: It’s right across the street behind that nice white door (or in your own home!). If we know to look deep enough, you’ll find that all of our lives are filled with plenty of struggles and pain. This really hit home for me when I was 20, and I met with a girl who had been part of my youth group when we were teens. She told me that her father (who had been an elder in our church) had sexually abused her as a teen growing up. That was happening to her while she heard our youth group leader preach sermons warning her of the mortal dangers of dancing and going to the movies.

He had no idea. Neither did I. What I do know now though is that we don’t need to make up some fake problem for God to solve. There are plenty of very real problems in our world, and in our lives, right now. Not just the very real harm we do, but also the harm done to us. Suffering, abuse, and tragedy can all make us feel worthless and cut off from God’s care and love. The gospel is just as much about breaking through to hurting, estranged and broken people as it about calling us to turn from our self-focused and hurtful ways. In fact, the two are often hopelessly intertwined.

Now before we go and blame all this on the Apostle Paul, let me tell you something else I’ve learned: The above reading of Romans is in fact a complete mischaracterization of Paul’s argument there.

Paul’s focus in Romans is not on convincing unbelievers that they need to get religion, it is actually addressed to a religious audience and focused on confronting them in their religious violence in which they were hoping for God to come in wrath and destroy their enemies. In other words, (despite what Luther might think) it is not a message for guilty souls telling them how to escape wrath, it is a rebuke of self-righteous folks who wanted to see wrath come down on their enemies.

This had been Paul’s own background as well. When Paul refers to himself as the “greatest of all sinners” he does not mean that he was a drunkard. In fact… and this may come as a surprise to many of you… Paul says he had no problem keeping all of the commandments. Luther may have thought that no one can keep the law, but Paul certainly didn’t. On the contrary, Paul says in Philippians 3:6 that he has kept the Torah “faultlessly.” He tells us that he was a “Hebrew of Hebrews,” and had no problem keeping the law perfectly. Yet Paul goes on to say that he considers all of these religious achievement to be “garbage” compared to Christ. Why?

Because of what it did to him.

Despite this spotless record Paul came to see himself as “the worst of all sinners.” Not because he had broken any commandments or laws. Again, he tells us he was “faultless” in this regard. No, the reason Paul says is “because I was a blasphemer and a violent man” (1 Tim 1:13). Paul’s grave sin, he tells us, was that he had participated in the violent persecution of the followers of Jesus, and he did this because he thought he was being faithful to God. In other words, his religion had lead him to commit horrible sins, causing severe harm and suffering for others, and he did this thinking he was doing it for God.

Also by Derek Flood: What Does Jesus Think About Homosexuality?

To be clear, this was not about a conversion from Judaism to Christianity for Paul. Paul continued to see himself as a faithful Jew. What Paul had converted away from was his former way of religious violence. When Paul says he is a “blasphemer” this does not mean he was cussing. It means that because of his hurtful actions he gave God a bad name. Today we often see the same thing: People who preach hate and hurt in God’s name drive people from God. They give God a bad name, they make God seem like monster. When people reject this abusive image of God, that is not the blasphemy. The blasphemy, Paul tells us–his blasphemy that he later came to be ashamed of–was misrepresenting who God was.

So when Paul says in Romans “All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” he is not addressing “sinners,” he is addressing a religious audience who want God to judge, who want wrath to be poured out on the hated Gentiles. Paul is telling them–and he knows this firsthand, because he had participated in this religiously justified violence himself!–that this way leads to death. Not death from an angry God so much as a very real and immediate death by the sword. He is not addressing irreligious sinners and telling them to repent of law-breaking, he is addressing religious people who believe in divine retribution (which he and they carried out themselves!) and telling them to repent of that.

If our only problem is that we told a white lie once, or occasionally cussed when we stubed our toe, then that is something that God could perhaps just overlook. After all, as many people would argue, can’t God forgive like he tells us to? But what Paul is dealing with here is not at all trivial. He’s dealing with hatred, murder, and violence–people killing each other in the name of God. Now we are dealing with some really serious heavy stuff that does real damage, devastating families, destroying lives. God cares about this because God cares about us. God cannot just overlook that, because it is really hurting people God loves. Paul is not talking about trivial infractions, he is talking about sin which devastates and destroys. Paul is talking about violence.

Not only is this a very serious thing Paul is addressing, it is also quite subtle: It’s pretty easy to recognize that alcoholism is bad (and indeed it is). It’s also easy to recognize that criminal behavior is bad (and it certainly is too). But it’s a lot harder to recognize the kind of thing Paul is addressing, because this is violence and hurt done in the name of God and justice. What Paul shows us is that you can be seemingly religiously “faultless” and still cause severe harm, still spread hate, still advocate for violence, but do this all under the cover of “holiness”–and you can do all this while justifying your actions with the Bible! In fact, that is exactly what Paul had done before Jesus stopped him in his tracks. That was Paul’s great sin, and this is what Paul is addressing in Romans.

With that background in mind, let’s consider the larger picture Paul paints for us in Romans which can be summed up in the following three points:

1) Sin is very real and causes real harm. We don’t need to make up a problem.

2) The most damaging of sins are often those that are hidden, those we cover under the mantle of God and justice, masquerading them as virtues. The major focus of the New Testament (both in the Epistles and the Gospels) is on precisely this kind of hidden religious sin.

3) Our problem is not only sinning, but about God overcoming sin itself. That is, we can be cut off from God both because of our hurtful self-focus, but also because of the hurt done to us. The gospel is not only good news for sinners, it is also good news for victims, good news for those who have been harmed by sin (and if we are honest, we are all a mix of both).

Paul’s larger message in Romans is that the gospel is about breaking out of that way of hurting others in God’s name, breaking out of the logic of retributive justice, and entering into God’s way of restorative justice demonstrated in Jesus Christ. That’s an understanding of the gospel that is not only a much more accurate reading of what Paul is actually saying in Romans, but is also an extremely relevant message for us today.

—-
Derek Flood is the author of Healing the Gospel: A Radical Vision for Grace, Justice, and the Cross. He is a featured blogger for the Huffington Post, Sojourners, Red Letter Christians, and writes regularly at his website theRebelGod.com. A longtime voice in the post-conservative evangelical movement, Derek’s focus is on wrestling with questions of faith and doubt, violence in the Bible, relational theology, and understanding the cross from the perspective of grace and restorative justice.

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

Print Friendly

About the Author

Derek FloodDerek Flood is the author of Healing the Gospel: A Radical Vision for Grace, Justice, and the Cross. He is a featured blogger for the Huffington Post, Sojourners, Red Letter Christians, and writes regularly at his website theRebelGod.com. A longtime voice in the post-conservative evangelical movement, Derek’s focus is on wrestling with questions of faith and doubt, violence in the Bible, relational theology, and understanding the cross from the perspective of grace and restorative justice.View all posts by Derek Flood →

  • http://twitter.com/MAGuyton Morgan Guyton

    YES! I think many Romans roaders skip over Romans 2 where Paul defines his audience very directly and specifically: “You, therefore, have no excuse,
    you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge
    another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do
    the same things. 2 Now we know that God’s judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. 3 So when you, a mere human being, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment? 4 Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness is intended to lead you to repentance?”

    All that Paul is saying in Romans 3-8 subsequent to this is putting the people he’s calling out in Romans 2 in their place. The whole point is for us to come to a place where we realize we don’t have a leg to stand on and thus be conquered by God’s mercy. Romans 11:32 is a summary statement of everything that comes before it: “For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.” Now mercy is not just cheap grace; it constitutes a loss of sovereignty on the part of the recipient. What acknowledging God’s mercy means is that you lose the right to self-justify and give yourself a soapbox from which to look down on others. People who want to keep their soapbox need to make Romans about something other than calling out their self-righteousness.

  • tarl_hutch

    Rob Bell also addressed this issue in Love Wins, the idea that the God most people reject is a false representation they have seen through the action of others. He relates a similar story of a young woman abused by her religious father and the fact he would pray and sing hymns while molesting her. This is an extreme example, but we see it on a smaller scale every day. Religious people who argue for justice and truth, or their understanding of it, at the expense of the image of Christ. Instead of the loving example and challenge of Jesus, we settle for the self righteous postion of judge and executioner, weighing down others with guilt without helping to ease the burden.

    There will certainly be push back against Derek’s comments regarding sin and the “Roman road”, but if one suspends some of that judgement and anger, one will see the deeper meaning of this post. As the great, and largrly unfollowed parable goes, we must take care of the log in our own eyes before judging the speck in the eyes of another. The gospels and the NT are largely, as Derek states, addressed at religious people, specifically the Jews, but even the “pagan” Romans. Never underestimate the damage a “righteous” person can do to the world. History reeks of religiously violent people, sanctifying violence in God’s name and blaspheming against the true nature of God.

    Yes, we should address the broken and sinful state of man, but on the real disconnect between man and God, and not on legalistic meritocracy. As a child I always wondered what I had done to make God so mad at me, instead of being shown that God was not angry at me, but wanted to show hos love and show me a way to overcome sin, hate, and fear. We focus on the wrong things in a effort to “guilt” people into christianity, instead of showing them a different and better way of life offered by Jesus. Just some thoughts, what do you think? Are we off the liberal deep end or are we coming to a better way of thunking about the same christian truths? What woild you do differently?

  • 21st Century Episcopalian

    I agree wholeheartedly that we need to get beyond simplistic and reductionistic approaches to sharing faith and communicating truth.

    Re: Romans 3… The self-righteousness Paul is addressing isn’t just a “I want bad or violent things to happen to my enemies”, it goes much deeper than that. That’s just a surface external that points to a deeper internal truth.

    When Paul calls himself chief of sinners, in the context of admitting he was indeed able to legalistically keep all commandments, he’s going deeper.

    The “deeper” is the internal. It’s one thing to perform actions (or inactions) or words (or lack of words) that would be construed as external sin. Take it deeper, as Paul “levels the playing field” in Romans 1-2 (both gentile and Jew/religious) are equally at fault in falling short of God’s perfect mark.

    The deeper internal is, as Paul has experienced firsthand and is writing about here, that even our most moral-appearing, holy-seeming, good deeds are all tainted by our internal self motivations. Even good and great moral examples have mixed motivations and therefore are not deeds that are pure and holy offerings.

    If I give up everything to pastor, preach, give all my money to the poor, love and serve the disadvantaged and marginialized every waking hour of every day, and if I do so with even a HINT of desire for recognition, approval, affirmation, or worse success (even if nobody is aware)… than I am equally as guilty as the gentiles and their horrendous sins Paul writes about in Romans 1.

    Romans 1 – Gentiles sin. Romans 2- Jews (and Christians) sin. Romans 3- Now that the playing field is leveled and nobody has a leg up on anyone else, we ALL need Jesus’ applied work on the cross on our behalf.

    All that to say it’s more complicated than mere violence so though I appreciate the author’s post, I think it’s too surface. We must go beyond externals into the deeper internal realm where the Spirit wants to work sanctification.

    • tarl_hutch

      Excellent points, though I think it bookends perfectly with the author’s post. Our external actions are symptoms of our internal beliefs. So really, you are writing about the same thing at different levels. Which makes it very good that you addressed another aspect of this issue. Thanks for the great thoughts.

      • 21st Century Episcopalian

        He does touch on the internal within his post. Thanks for pointing that out; I honestly had missed it at first.

  • Anonymous

    This is exactly what the commandment about taking the Lord’s name in vain means. It does not mean saying a four-letter word or even “GD it”. It means using the Lord’s name to further your own or the devil’s agenda.

  • http://www.facebook.com/chipley Ben Chipley

    I’m going to re-read this but, at first glance, that I understand is that as long as I’m not violent, love everyone, don’t judge, etc… I’m alright with God? I think you’re missing the point of Romans entirely. God never “sends” anyone to hell, He gives us a choice, either believe that Christ paid the price for our sins (Rom. 6:23) when He died on the cross, the Gospel (I Cor. 15:1-4) we believe, or that we can pay the price ourselves. (Rev. 20:11-15)
    Paul’s point was that ALL of us are sinners, the immoral, the moral and the righteous have no excuse. Romans 4-8 explain the doctrine of justification – being saved, and sanctification – walking in the Spirit, not the flesh. Chapters 9 – 11 are addressed mainly to the Jews and chapters 12, and the rest give, us principles for daily Christian living.
    Romans 10:9 says “…that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.” – Period. NOT being violent, NOT judging and loving one another are good thing, they are are RESULTS of the righteousness imputed to our account because we believe the Gospel. (Romans 4:24) We may be able to “do good” and “be good” in our own power, but that, without Faith in Christ and what He did on the cross doesn’t change our relationship to God. We are still His enemy until we BELIEVE the Gospel! (Romans 8:7)
    God bless you all!!

    • Derek

      “I’m going to re-read this but, at first glance, that I understand is
      that as long as I’m not violent, love everyone, don’t judge, etc… I’m
      alright with God?”

      Yes, I suppose you are “alright with God” if you love. God wants us to love, and when we do, Jesus sees that and values it.

      However, the point is not to just pass some test of “good enough,” so you can get our ticket into heaven, the point is to be in a loving relationship with God. We were made for that.

      So what Paul says in Romans that the way out of our violence and hatred (which is often motivated by fundamentalist religion) is to be in a relationship with God. Hanging out with Jesus, we come to act and think like him.

      I disagree with the angry punishing image of God you seem to have. We are violent and judgmental, God is not. That was Paul’s mistake, until he met Christ. It made him have to re-think all the stuff he had read in his Bible in light of Christ. So I hope that you can experience God’s grace and forgiveness in your own life too, so that in being broken by love, you can learn to show that love to others, rather than basing your message on threats and fear.

×

TRENDING: Five Reasons Christian Parents "Lose" Their Children