Ten More Cliches Christians Should Avoid

After writing up my first list of Ten Cliches Christians Should Never Use, some folks wrote me with other suggestions. After simmering on it for a while, I came up with a second list of ten to supplement the first.

And as there was some confusions from a handful of fellow Christians about the intent of the articles. These are not intended to tell you to believe or not believe a certain set of things. Christians have a Public Relations problem; that much is self-evident. So in as much as I can respond to that, I want to offer these as advice on how to change the way we approach people about our faith.

On to the next ten cliches for Christians to avoid…

  1. Love the sinner, hate the sin. This is a backhanded way to tell someone you love them, at best. It also ignores the command by Jesus not to focus on the splinter in our neighbors’ eyes while a plank remains in our own. Bottom line: we all screw up, and naming others’ sin as noteworthy while remaining silent about your own is arrogant.
  2. The Bible clearly says…Two points on this one. First, unless you’re a Biblical scholar who knows the historical and cultural contexts of the scriptures and can read them in their original languages, the Bible isn’t “clear” about much. Yes, we can pick and choose verses that say one thing or another, but by whom was it originally said, and to whom? Cherry-picking scripture to make a point is called proof-texting, and it’s a theological no-no. Second, the Bible can be used to make nearly any point we care to (anyone want to justify slavery?), so let’s not use it as a billy club against each other.
  3. God needed another angel in heaven, so He called him/her home. Another well-meaning but insensitive thing to say. This assumes a lot about what the person you’re speaking to believes, and it also ignores the grief they’re going through. The person who died is, well, dead. Focus on the needs of the living right in front of you.
  4. Are you saved? I’ve addressed the theological understandings of hell and judgment in other pieces, but regardless of whether you believe in hell, this is a very unattractive thing to say. First, it implies a power/privilege imbalance (ie, “I’m saved, but I’m guessing you’re not based on some assumptions I’m making about you), and it also leaps over the hurdle of personal investment and relationship, straight into the deep waters of personal faith. If you take the time to learn someone’s story, you’ll like learn plenty about what they think and believe in the process. And who knows? You might actually learn something too, rather than just telling others what they should believe.
  5. The Lord never gives someone more than they can handle. What about people with mental illness? What about people in war-torn countries who are tortured to death? What about the millions of Jews murdered in the Holocaust? And this also implies that, if really horrible things are happening to you, God “gave” it to you. Is this a test? Am I being punished? Is God just arbitrarily cruel? Just don’t say it.
  6. Christian’s First List of Cliches Christians Should Avoid: Ten Cliches Christians Should Never Use

  7. America was founded as a Christian nation. Honestly, I find it hard to believe we are still having this conversation, but here we are. Anyone with a cursory understanding of history understands that we were founded on the principle of religious liberty – not just the liberty to be a Christian – and that many of the founding fathers explicitly were not Christian. Thomas Jefferson, anyone?
  8. The Bible says it; I believe it; that settles it. If ever there was a top-shelf conversation killer this is it. You’re not inviting any opinion, response, thought or the like. You’re simply making a claim and telling others to shut up. Also, I’ve yet to meet someone who takes EVERY WORD of the Bible literally. Everyone qualifies something in it, like the parts about keeping kosher, wearing blended fibers, stoning adulterers, tossing your virgin daughters into the hands of an angry mob…you get the point.
  9. It was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. This is a little “joke” some Christians use to assert the superiority of opposite-sex unions over same-sex ones. But here’s the thing: if you really believe the first and only two people on the planet at one point were Adam and Eve, who did their kids marry and have babies with? This, my friends, is incest (happened again if you believe Noah’s family members were the only survivors of the great flood). This just demonstrates the selective moral blindness many of us Christian have and seriously compromises our credibility about anything else.
  10. Jesus was a Democrat/Republican. Seems to me that, when pressed, Jesus was happy to keep church and state separate. Remember the whole thing about giving to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and giving to God what is God’s? And if we choose to, we can pick and choose anecdotes to support Jesus being a liberal (care for the poor, anti death penalty) or a conservative (challenge government authority, practice sexual purity). Jesus was Jesus, and if it was as simple as pegging him to one of two seriously flawed contemporary forms of government, I can promise you I would not be a Christian.
  11. (Insert sin here) is an abomination in the eyes of God. Almost always, when this phrase is invoked, it has something to do with sex or sexuality. Seldom do folks care to mention that divorce and remarriage is in that list of so-called abominations. Also, there are several words translated in English Bibles as ‘abomination,’ many of which don’t imply the sort of exceptionalism that such a word makes us think of today. And while we’re on the thread of things scripture says God “hates,’ let’s consider this from Proverbs:

These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among  brethren.

I’m going to go out on a limb and propose that telling someone that who they are or what they are doing is an abomination to God is tantamount to sowing discord among your brothers and sisters. And this, according to the text above is itself an abomination.

—-
Christian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He co-founded Milagro Christian Church in Pueblo, Colorado with his wife, Rev. Amy Piatt, in 2004. He is the creator and editor of BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE and BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS. Christian has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date.Visit www.christianpiatt.com, or find him on Twitter or Facebook.

Advertisement


Print Friendly

About the Author

Christian Piatt

Christian PiattChristian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He co-founded Milagro Christian Church in Pueblo, Colorado with his wife, Rev. Amy Piatt, in 2004.He is the creator and editor of BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE and BANNED QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS. Christian has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date. Visit www.christianpiatt.com, or find him on Twitter or Facebook.View all posts by Christian Piatt →

  • Charles

    So – ignore sin, don’t quote from the Bible, and don’t worry about folks’ salvation.

    Got it.

    • tarl_hutch

      You well know this is not what the author is saying, he is speaking of cliched sayings that are overused and most people under think. This is a good way to stir up debate and get a reqction, which of course I am granting, but surely at some point, someone has said one of these things to you and it did nothing to help you. Christian, I believe, is attempting to inspire us above rote regurgitation and into thoughtful examination and true empathy.

      Do you think there might be other ways to discuss these issues without resorting to the old standbys? Would that help or hurt?

    • Simon Nicholls

      Right. The sin I must not ignore is my own – including my self-righteousness – I can do something about that. I don’t need to quote directly from the Bible to speak Biblically, and to do so only makes sense when you and the person you are in conversation with share a belief about its authority. And the salvation I need to “worry” about is my own. Others’ salvation is in the hands of a judge who is infinitely more righteous than I am, more gracious, and who knows the FULL circumstances of a person’s heart, life and situation better than I ever will.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=589346367 Jeremy Koontz

    Many of these statements are loaded for discussion. Thank you for your work!

  • http://ricbooth.wordpress.com Ric

    I’m loving these, btw.

  • Anonymous

    Stuff Christians doth like: using ye olde KJV to bringeth home their point. :) haha

  • DougB

    Totally Dig This!!!!

    Too many out there “know more than you or I”…….

  • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

    Love this! So true, every one.

  • ATL-Apostate

    Excellent points. However, the author fails to provide any alternatives. Moreover, he doesn’t explicitly condemn the underlying ideas (sin, hell, salvation), just the commonest Christianease means of expressing them. Take home point: it’s ok to still consider yourself righteous and morally superior, just be more tactful about how you present it. :|

  • Jeff

    I prefer to say “Love the sinner, hate YOUR OWN sin” in response to #1

  • http://bluebonnetreads.wordpress.com Hannah C.

    Actually, I would disagree with your #6 as well. The United States was founded on the concept of liberty, yes, but not specifically religious liberty. Several states had religious requirements for office even after the Bill of Rights was ratified. Virginia nearly had a state-supported church. Multiple states had “blue laws.” Some of the *colonies* were originally founded on religious liberty…others (the majority) were founded on religious liberty, but only for the right people.

  • akiva

    A question I have is where in the bible does it say that when someone dies they become an angel? If a good person becomes an angel does this mean that a bad person becomes a demon? I have studied Judaism and in the Jewish faith
    Angels are a form of purely spiritual being that serve G-d in whatever capacity he desires. Angels in Judaism do NOT have free will. there thus Humans with freewill are considered above the angels since we choose to serve God.

    • Becky

      It doesn’t. This is a weird belief, and I’m not sure where it sprang from, though there are a lot of angel-human related beliefs in Mormonism. Just one of those weird things.

      • Jennifer A. Nolan

        A thousand pardons, Becky, but the reason why the Jewish belief akiva cited strikes you as weird is because it is JEWISH!! We Christians do not teach it to our children or our converts. Whatever we think of Jewish or other non-Christian notions about God or the company of Heaven, we must be careful to keep a civil tongue and a civil attitude — which is actually Piatt’s overarching point.

  • Mark

    As researched as your article is it is indeed very bias and is directed towards those with itching ears.

    1. This is a poor examination of the phrase ‘Love the sinner, hate the sin.’ We are called to do just that, Love sinners and hate sin. You bringing in the scripture on the log in your own eye as a retort is not great. If anything this scripture supports the phrase. It is saying don’t judge people, love them. Nowhere in that scripture do I get that we shouldn’t hate sin, mine or theirs.

    2. Really? So only biblical scholars can use this phrase? You founded a church, I hope you encourage people to quote from their bible and learn it. The bible is very clear on a lot of stuff that you do not need to be a scholar or learn the Greek on. If anything this is the most shocking and unbiblical thing you have said.

    3. Agreed, but seriously if you are really a Christian you would not be saying such things.

    4. You are missing a whole bunch of things here, context, tone and nature of the conversation. If I was preaching in a church I might ask the question, or open air church gathering, maybe if I was having a discussion on faith with somebody in a bar I might ask them if they think they are going to heaven, if I had a long term friend who was in and out of church I might ask them. I probably wouldn’t if I was doing street witnessing as it would be off putting. In short though, be very careful if you decide to avoid heaven and hell, Jesus didn’t and neither did Paul, and yes I did some good research. Go read erasing hell by Francis Chan.

    5. While I am inclined to agree with you in some areas, it is difficult to ignore scripture on this one. As Christians I believe we are given exactly what He wants us to have. What is the alternative? That God wants to give us more but is somehow restricted? Doesn’t sound like an all powerful God to me?

    6. A point neither here nor there for me. Does it make a difference to anything?

    7. Agreed, we should always be ready to give an account. Be careful though, don’t use old testament practice to justify the reason for not being literal. Jesus fulfilled the law and we live by the Spirit now so we don’t have to do all those nasty things. That doesn’t mean that we stop taking God’s word literally.

    8. Seriously?! This is your argument? Incest? You should read some more apologetic works cause this is a poor argument at best. Look incest wasn’t against law in Genesis and given the fact that people lived for such a long time it was very possible for them to have many kids. Equally as they were so much closer to the tree of life, deformities were not going to be an issue. I am interested to know what your alternative is to the bible?

    9. This is just a joke statement, Christians should not be saying such ridiculous things and if they did I would laugh uncontrollably at such arrogance.

    10. Wow. Look just because you have catergorised sexual abominations amoung some hates from proverbs doesn’t make them not abominations. They still are! People use it to say it is wrong, well unfortunately they are, yes including divorce. I agree it is wrong to isolate some of them like homosexuality and say look its an abomination but forget many other things. However, do not seek to soften the horror of one sin by pointing out others….sounds like twig and log to me.

    Look, while I am sure you wrote this piece with the best of intentions I would encourage you not to make so many care free and very bias statements, you will be accountable for your teaching one day, I for one will stick as close to scripture as possible. I won’t be one of those who try and make Gods word fit into the world of today in order to make the gospel more attractive to the man who wishes to live a water downed Christianity. Gods word does not fit into the world and we shouldn’t fit in either, we should stand out as a light to a broken world.

    • dan

      Well put brother, I agree with you on every one of these points, thank you for taking the time to put these thoughts into words.. It is a scary thing to use our salvation as a cloak of maliciousness but even scarier to deny the existence of our own sin as well as sin as a whole.
      To the Author.
      I would just like to say that I love saying number 1 and believe you are taking it grossly out of context. It is not saying anything backhanded it reinforces the fact that you are not supposed to judge (this is God’s job) or hate (this is Satan’s job) but love your neighbor (without condoning his sin). Hoping that God will be able use your witness to reveal the darkness to your brother/sister.

    • Patrick

      Thank you. I 100% agree with you on every single point.

  • http://twitter.com/Stormbringer_5 Stormbringer

    Off base. The first one, I don’t like the “love the sinner, hate the sin expression itself. But the write-up is bad. If we have to wait until we *think* we’re perfect before addressing the sin in someone else is a gross misunderstanding of the beam/plank verse.

    The second one, “The Bible clearly says” has problems. Do we have to be experts before we can use God’s Word? Not bloody likely! While it is good advice to be careful when asserting things that are actually *not* so clearly stated, some things, the Bible *does* clearly say. I can accept the fact that caution is in order when saying this.

    Another angel in Heaven… I HATE THAT, glad it’s on the list.

    The Adam and Steve thing, the argument there is weak. God set down the pattern for marriage in Genesis, Jesus reaffirmed it.

    America *was indeed* founded as a Christian nation, doubtful quote-mining of Jefferson not withstanding. Most of the founders were what would be considered “fundamentalists” today, only three of the 47 or so were deists. Don’t make me give you a history lesson and a boatload of quotes.

    The sex sin in the eyes of God that is an abomination is homosexuality. Perhaps you should consider some of your own advice in point 2 here, and check out the emphasis in the Hebrew, how this abomination get special status.

×

TRENDING: Five Reasons Christian Parents "Lose" Their Children