The Girl Who Cried Wolf, and Other Myths

You can’t go online lately without hearing about hearing about Herman Cain and the allegations of sexual harassment haunting his campaign. Those posts inevitably make me wince—not the articles themselves, but the comments crowded beneath them like protestors punching hand-scrawled signs in the air, screaming at the “other side.” Now, before you get all riled up, this article is not about Herman Cain. It’s about those comments. Specifically, it’s about the Christian community’s response to women who accuse men of sexual impropriety.

You’d think that Christians would be very interested in standing up for a woman’s dignity. After all, don’t most Christian books about gender teach that it’s a man’s role todefend women? But all too often, the evangelical response to men’s shameful shenanigans, especially when nothing physical has taken place, has been a sort of snide, “boys will be boys” affirmation of male virility. High fives all around, while the woman, mortified, slinks back into the shadows. I mean, what did she expect, trading the safety of the kitchen for the wild and wooly “man’s world”?

I grew up surrounded by loving, protective men, so this attitude truly shocked me when I first encountered it. I felt downright betrayed in the mid-nineties, when Focus on the Family began circulating ridiculous stories about little boys being wrongfully accused of sexual harassment. This philosophical slight-of-hand effectively took the church’s eyes off the real problem—that girls and women were being shamefully mistreated at school and work—and cemented evangelicals’ jaundiced view of much-needed sexual harassment laws. I remember writing an impassioned letter to Dr. Dobson (who I had idolized up to that point), suggesting that he come take a walk down the hallways of my school, where girls wore running shorts under their skirts for fear of being “flipped,” where boys made up lewd songs about menstruation and masturbation to enjoy the sick power-trip of humiliating insecure teenage girls, and where stepping onto the school bus was like stepping into the crucible, an hour-long test of endurance that bore more resemblance to hyper-sexualized, post-apocalyptic anarchy than a peaceful ride home. I never sent the letter, but I did manage to convince my parents to start picking me up after school.

My experience was not the least bit unusual, nor was it extreme. (My friend Ryan cowering in the choir room because he had received death threats, or the sort of nonsense that went on at this school are better examples of how out of hand sexual harassment can get.) Sexual harassment is real, it can cause devastating emotional damage, and Christ’s followers should be speaking out against it, instead of suggesting people “suck it up” and accept the prevailing cultural iniquity. So why are some Christians acting like sexual harassment laws and the people who avail themselves of them are the scourge, instead of sexual harassment itself?

A comment on a recent Red Letter Christians article exemplified one of the prevailing attitudes about sexual harassment. “As for these allegations I will tell you firsthand that in an effort to protect women in these situations we have gone quite the other way. All a woman has to do is ‘cry wolf’ and ruin a man whether it’s true or not. It’s BS. The exact same punishment should be exacted to the complaintant that the defendant is facing should the charges not be proven… If you have proof then by all means bring it but if it’s a he-said/she-said then you should have to deal with it just like every other person who cries wolf without proof.”

Okay, look. I don’t doubt that some infinitesimal number of messed-up women do falsely accuse men of sexual harassment. But the sort of overblown antagonism this commenter (and countless others) expresses is, in and of itself, a form of intimidation that serves to keep women’s mouths shut. Since when does a woman need “proof” to complain about inappropriate behavior? (Remember—she’s reporting it to her school or workplace, not taking the guy to court—although she can sue the organization if it fails to take appropriate action.) Unless there are witnesses willing to back up her story, there is no way to “prove” that harassment has taken place. For that matter, there is no way to prove that a woman has been raped, unless she goes to the hospital and submits herself to rape treatment.  (Unfortunately, most prefer locking themselves in the bathroom and sobbing in the shower.) Does the fact that an allegation can’t be proven mean that a woman shouldn’t report it? How convenient.

And what are we supposed to make of the shudder-worthy suggestion that a woman be “punished” if her allegations can’t be proven? Happily for the “complaintant,” the worst punishment most harassers face is losing their job, a possibility many women in that situation are staring down anyway. Still, the truth of the matter is that most women don’t report sexual infractions for fear of reprisal. Oh, we don’t stone women for coming forward with allegations of sexual impropriety like they do in some other parts of the world; we just call them liars, sluts and hussies who were obviously asking for whatever they got. We imply that these troublemaking women are shameless seducers with wicked ulterior motives, carnal temptresses intent on bringing virtuous men down into the grave.

And all Eve’s daughters sigh.

I’m going to shift gears for a moment, because when it comes to unwanted sexual advances, harassment is just the tip of the huge, destructive and mostly hidden iceberg lurking under the surface of American society. We need to look at the culture these allegations are taking place in. According to the Centers for Disease Control, one out of every four girls has been sexually molested by the time she turns 14. (Stop for a moment and let that sink in. One in four of our precious little girls.) One in six women has been a victim of attempted or completed rape in her lifetime, and approximately 7.8 million women have been raped by a boyfriend, husband, or significant other. According to estimates from the US Department of Justice, fewer than half of all rapes are reported to the police, and only one out of twenty rapists ever spends a day in jail for their crimes.

What this tells me is that the problem isn’t histrionic shepherdesses crying wolf. Most of them never even make a peep. The real problem is that the flocks are teeming with wolves, and women are afraid to speak up for fear of getting their throats torn out. Liar. Hussy. Shameful. Slut. Everyone will hate you if you tell.

Too often, we’re proving the wolves right.

Friends, sexual harassment is a serious issue. As Christians, we need to stop minimizing these evils and listen carefully to what the victims have to say. Even when it costs us something. Even when it makes us uncomfortable. And rest assured, it probably will.

I’ll leave you with some words of wisdom from Ephesians 5:3-13, because Paul says it better than I ever could: But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people. Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a person is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient. Therefore do not be partners with them.

For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) and find out what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light.

Brothers and sisters, let’s not squeeze our eyes shut and pretend that the darkness is just in our head. Instead, let’s expose the deeds of darkness, shining the bright light of Christ’s truth on the dark spots in our society, in our histories, and in our hearts, so God can illuminate them and make us a beacon of light to a dark, dark world.

—-
Jenny Rae Armstrong is an award-winning freelance journalist who blogs about faith, social justice, and women’s issues at http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com/. She is passionate about building up the body of Christ by building up women, in her rural community and around the world. She loves making new friends, so drop by her blog and say hi, or follow her on Twitteror Facebook.

Print Friendly

  • Kriste

    Bravo!

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Thanks Kriste!

  • Will

    Of course, we should always presume men are guilty until proven innocent, right?

    • Keri Wyatt Kent

      Will, thank you for giving a perfect example of the kind of comment this writer is talking about! 
      No one said the men were guilty, but just that we can’t blame the victims. What if we gave equal respect to both men and women? 

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Of course not. But we shouldn’t presume the women are guilty of lying and slander, either. It’s a very delicate issue, and we listen carefully, exhibit gentleness, and offer a lot of grace to everyone involved in these sort of situations. 

      • Bernhe

        I appreciate your response.  Especially ” we listen carefully, exhibit gentleness, and offer a lot of grace to everyone involved in these sort of situations.”

      • Bernhe

        I appreciate your response.  Especially ” we listen carefully, exhibit gentleness, and offer a lot of grace to everyone involved in these sort of situations.”

  • Bernhe

    Jenny,
    Did you or do you take offense at Bill Clinton’s treatment of women? 

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Absolutely. From what I understand, his relationship with Monica Lewinski wouldn’t qualify as “unwanted,” however, it was certainly immoral. I would also argue that it is especially wrong for an older man in a very powerful position to take advantage of a younger woman with much less clout, even if she IS a willing participant. Not illegal, but that’s not going to be a defense when we give account to God.

      Philandering and misogyny know no boundaries, political or otherwise. :-/ It does bother me when people politicize these issues in an attempt to advance their cause, but ultimately, our response needs to based on what is Christ-like, not on what is politically expedient. “Love does not delight in evil, but rejoices in the truth.” It’s not the way the world does things, but it’s the way we’re called to live–even when it hurts.

      • Bernhe

        There is a lot more to Clinton’s history than just Monica.  And a lot of those were not mutual.  I liked your article, it had many good points, but there was no need to refer to Herman Cain.
        In fact Bill Clinton would be the more appropriate example. But it would not have gotten as much attention. 
        I think the morals of a leader are very significant.  In politics, there seems to be a downplay of the morals of a candidate we support and outrage at those we oppose.

        • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

          Yes, unfortunately, there is no shortage of people who could provide ample context for an article about sexual harassment. :-/ I agree that a leader’s character is very important, and, as you noted, people tend to sling mud on people they disagree with and cover up the dirt on people they think will advance their cause. That was not my intention, but it IS the hullabaloo surround the allegations against Cain that is currently stinking up the internet, and providing a newsworthy context in which to address a topic that I am much more passionate about than politics. I’m glad you liked the article otherwise!

  • Bernhe

    The article says it is not about Herman Cain.  So why is his photo there?  There are some really good points in the article.  It could have, and should have, been written without his name in it.  He claims innocence and that should be respected until proven otherwise.

  • Dr. Bill

    Jenny, there’s a lot to chew on here, but in particular I was interested in your personal account of the behavior of school aged young men.  Having listened to the dehumanizing talk a young adult males, I guess I’m not surprised.  But what bothers me is how to make any headway in dealing with the problem.  All I have seen lately is the progessive sexualization of all youth, and the obsessive,destructive behavior that comes with it.  And to compound that, the problem is still largely avoided as a serious topic of discourse in our churches.  With the high school class I teach in my church I can easily open the subject up for discussion, but when it comes to the adults they blush and quickly change the subject, even though I have a particularly strong influence on these same adults. 
         Your article sheds light on a serious problem with no easy answer.  Its unfortunate you have to suffer the somewhat sophomoric responses I’ve seen, rather than a less defensive discussion.

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Dr. Bill, thanks so much for your response! 

      Regarding making headway on this issue, I have a couple thoughts: 

      -We need to teach and model what respectful relationships look like. Of course, a lot of us adults have a lot of learning to do in that area as well. :-/ But bottom line, if kids see adults engaging in crass jokes or “locker room conversations,” they’re going to think that’s normal and okay.

      -We need to confront the behavior when we see it, especially in young people. Too often we turn a blind eye, but when we let it slide we’re essentially telling them it’s okay. Here’s an example: my husband teaches music and coaches bands. A couple years ago, a group of very nice young Christian men that he was working with started satirizing gay people–lisping, limp wrists, etc. They weren’t trying to be bad–in their minds, they were just joking around. My husband explained (very kindly and calmly) that that sort of “joking” could be hurtful, asked them to think about what sort of message their behavior was sending, and told them that he was not okay with it. They became very sober (because their intent was never to hurt people–they were just being immature and thoughtless), and because they respected my husband, they stopped.

      -We need to talk more about kind, encouraging and mutually edifying communication in our churches. So many people bristle at the idea of “political correctness,” but among Christians, speaking with respect, honoring requests about how people would and would NOT like to be spoken to, and avoiding “obscenity, foolish talk, and coarse joking” should be a given. Some people are stubborn about that, but frankly, it’s self-centered and wrong. We need to be considerate, putting the needs of others before our own desire for self-expression–especially when we’re “expressing” something about that particular other!

      Phew, this is long! That’s a start, though. I have four sons, so this is something I think about a LOT!!!

      • Dr. Bill

        In my youth I probably would have been one of the young men your husband gave more than one lecture too.  I am fully aware of the impetuousness and impulsiveness of the undeveloped male though process.  As you indicate, appropriate male modeling from respected adults is necessary, and because of that mature men need to be “urged” to do so.  Moreso, their behavior should somehow be a model to the young women who observe them.  But somewhere in the middle of this the class in behavior modification ends and the Holy Spirit has to take over.  The desire for peer approval among teens is far more powerful than adult approval, and so an even greater power has to be invoked.  Without the redefining power of Christ and the work of the Spirit the task is withering. 
             This could get too long, so its a good place to stop.  Thank you for getting this rolling in my mind again. 

  • Lauren

    Thank you so much for writing this…It is extremely validating for me as I feel ashamed and isolated after a traumatic event. Very few people have validated my experience, but this shows me that this truly is a problem and not something that should be brushed off. Please keep writing truth. I will be following your writing. 

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Lauren, I am SO sorry to hear that. As a daughter and image-bearer of God, you deserve to be treated with love, compassion, dignity and respect!!! Many people try to minimize these issues, brush them off, or downright deny them because the situation makes them uncomfortable, and they don’t know how to respond. But that’s no excuse. 

      I’m praying right now that God will bring you into a safe place where you can be wrapped up in love and get the support you need, and that He will pour his healing out on you. God is gracious! Take heart, and hang on!!!

      • Lauren

        Thank you so much. Those words are beautiful and I know you mean them. Keep writing. God has given you the ability not only to speak and articulate truth, but to speak love and encouragement to those who are hurting. Looking forward to worshipping with you in heaven. :)

        -Lauren

        • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

          It’s a date–see you there! ;-) *hugs*

  • Pingback: A Few Good Men | Jenny Rae Armstrong

  • Akiva Janeway

    I really enjoyed this article.It reminded me of a conversation I had with my mother may years ago. We were arguing over the fact that she felt “a girl was asking for it because of how she was dressed.’  I was appalled that my mother felt that way especially since she had experienced sexual harassment at the company she was working for at the time. I was and am happy that I convinced that we should never assume a woman is asking for it and that she wanted the sexual advances because of how she is dressed.  I also agree with you  that the issue is that neither side be dismissed as lying since this kind of behavior is usually done in situations that there are no witness and that it is why it is hard to prove whether someone is lying or telling the truth. 

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Thanks Akiva! It’s sad–women often have as much to do with propagating wrong beliefs (such as someone “asking for it” by wearing certain types of clothes) as men do, even when it’s harmful to them. Hmm…I think a post on how women choose to clothe themselves and why might be brewing…I’m going to have to think on this one for a while.

      • Bernhe

        Include in the article the distinct difference between men and women concerning visual stimulation.  It is a biological fact, not a choice.

  • Anonymous

    When I was at a middle school dance, I did something I shouldn’t have while I was on the dance floor. The expression on the girl’s face comes back in my memory from time to time when I’m reading conversations like this.

    This not to give an excuse for what I did, but it didn’t happen outside of a context in which adolescent boys are constantly daring each other to touch girls. We live in a hyper-eroticized world because sex is the #1 marketing tool that the free market uses to sell products. Teenage boys’ libidos are a raging wildfire that the advertising industry keeps on dousing with gasoline.

    Sexual harassment particularly among teenagers needs to be a community responsibility. The responsible adults need to be watching more carefully and naming things aloud long before it gets to anything approaching litigious. I think that part of the problem is when sexuality is treated like a taboo “Thou shalt not” that has to do with not disobeying God’s law but nothing to do with the dignity of the other person.

    When we talk to kids about sex, it needs to be about how to love each other and respect each other’s dignity. And I might get jumped on for saying this, but it needs to be okay to ask girls why they’re wearing short skirts in addition to asking boys why they dare each other to make sexual advances on the girls. The taboo-ness needs to be taken out of the equation. It needs to be “Because I love and respect you, I will/will not…” as opposed to just “Because the Bible says so, I will/will not…”

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Morgan, I absolutely agree with what you said about how dealing with sexual harassment and other sexual indiscretions has to be a community responsibility. I’m certainly not going to jump on anyone for saying that we need to to be talking to girls about their attire–we absolutely need to be! My main concern is that when we’re talking to both boys and girls about these issues, we need to do it in a calm, gentle manner that is not shaming and does not come across as reactive. And in my opinion, we need to make it clear that it is about THEIR behavior, not someone else’s. For example, the time to bring up the short skirt is NOT after the girl has been violated. (For that matter, I don’t think it’s a good idea to talk about it when the girl is already out in public in said short skirt and can’t do anything about it but walk around feeling ashamed and insecure–it would be better to talk about it later. But that’s a different issue.)

      The media and peer pressure is, I’m sure, the driving force between much of this problem, but adults still have more influence than we would perhaps like to admit, especially when we’re working as a community. 

  • Bernhe

    I am not in favor of Michele Bachmann for president but the treatment she received from the band at NBC was horrible.  Playing a song called  “Lyin’ Ass Bitch” as she walked on stage was despicable.
    “The  drummer Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson released a statement through his spokeswoman Tuesday calling the song choice “tongue in cheek.”
    Someone should be fired over this.
    I think this goes right along with what this article is about.

    • Jennifer A. Nolan

      Thanks for this last comment of yours, Bernhe.

      As for how women dress, we have some distance to go.  Why is all fomalwear not only sleeveless, but STRAPLESS?  Why do we ALL have to show so much flesh, whereever we are, whatever we are doing?  There are ways to be elegant, or at least, frump-free, without “letting it all hang out,”  and we women need to learn them.  Furthermore, this much exposure is more elegant on tiny, non-erotic tykes than on anyone over 10.  Thoughtful people of both sexes should go back to the drawing board on this one; our knowledge of comportment that wins true respect has taken a dive in the last quarter-century.

  • Anonymous

    Well said Jenny Rae.  There is so much wrong with our culture in this area it’s hard to even know where to start fixing it.

    • http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com Jenny Rae Armstrong

      Thank you. :-)

×

TRENDING: Five Reasons Christian Parents "Lose" Their Children