The Impossibility of Being President and Following Jesus

President And Following Jesus
It’s impossible to be the president of the United States and to follow Jesus.* This is a radical claim in this heated election season, without a doubt, but is why I couldn’t care less what religion a candidate claims to adhere to.

I’m going to demonstrate why the personal faith of our candidates doesn’t matter. I do this at the risk of offending some fellow Christians who don’t hold my same viewpoints on the following issues. This certainly is not my intention as I always try to approach divisive issues with passion balanced by charity. I hope what I say is full of both love and zeal.

Growing up, I was taught that America is God’s second chosen nation. We are a country that provides liberty for all who believe in the holy institution of democracy. When we fight wars, its always so that oppressed peoples can be liberated, just like Jesus would want them to be. War leads to peace, which yields freedom for all.

This nation emerged in history at the appropriate time to modernize the barbaric and to be an example of Christ to the nations, at least this is the impression I had as a child and young adult. Interestingly, when issues like the genocide of Native Americans came up, it was mourned and quickly left in the past. The same was true of slavery. These things took place in our early history because people simply didn’t know better. Nevertheless, the logic was that this nation was founded on Christian principles by devout godly men – sincere followers of Jesus. I now see this glossy story as a legitimizing myth. It is impossible to found, maintain, defend, and expand a nation while following Jesus’ teachings. Here’s why.

Related: Is Choosing to Note Vote Selfish?

Early Christians, in the few hundred years following the New Testament period but before the Constantinian Shift** (which eventually led to the marriage between the cross and the sword), refused to be connected to any profession connected governmental leadership. For instance, consider these words from Hippolytus around 218 CE (one of many examples of this conviction):

The professions and trades of those who are going to be accepted into the community must be examined. The nature and type of each must be established…brothel, sculptors of idols, charioteer, athlete, gladiator…give it up or be rejected. A military constable must be forbidden to kill, neither may he swear; if he is not willing to follow these instructions, he must be rejected. A proconsul or magistrate who wears the purple and governs by the sword shall give it up or be rejected. Anyone taking or already baptized who wants to become a soldier shall be sent away, for he has despised God (as quoted in: Jesus for President).

The early church, convinced as it was that Jesus commanded his followers never to resort to violence, understood that certain jobs were inconsistent with being fully devoted disciples of Christ. Of course, working as soldiers or magistrates were not the only ways to have one’s commitment to the faith called into question. Any profession that promoted actions and attitudes inconsistent with holiness were deemed opposed to following Christ. This wasn’t some sort of fundamentalist legalism, but rather quite obvious ways to not be in line with the way of the Kingdom (similar to how we might view blatantly sinful jobs such as: willful prostitution, pornographic film producers, or drug dealers).***

Having a career that placed oneself in a position to use violence (directly or indirectly) always makes it impossible to fully follow Jesus. Violence is opposed to the way of Jesus. In fact, state sanctioned violence crucified the incarnation of God. And according to the Scriptures, God raised Jesus from the dead and exposed the governmental powers of their evil. Colossians 2.15 says:

And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.

Jesus’ resurrection disarmed the powers (both visible and invisible) of their ultimate weapon – death via capital punishment. The greatest violence of the state couldn’t hold down the true Son of God!

Of course, the question of executing criminals may not be as big of a deal for a modern day leader. The President, under the right policies could oppose the death penalty. And if that were the only access to violence that our President had, then perhaps he (or she) could in fact faithfully follow Jesus. But we know that the President of the United States functions as our Commander-in-Chief (head of the military). He is at the top of the military hierarchy. When drones strikes occur under the President’s watch as innocents are unjustly killed, those actions are a direct extension of his authority. When Osama Bin Laden was shot in the head by a Navy SEALs team, the blood was on the hands of the President (as well as the soldiers and all who were involved).

Brave New Films

Also by Kurt: Christian Politics — Speak Truth. Be Truth. That’s It!

Jesus taught: “But I say to you: don’t use violence to resist evil!” (Matt. 5.39, KNT). In the same breath he added: “love your enemies and pray for those who harass you” (Matt. 5.44, CEB). The New Testament is clear: you cannot follow Jesus and carry the sword of vengeance. Some will argue that God allows the government to use the sword to “punish evildoers.” This is true, not to the extent evangelicals often think; but yes, the governments of the world are here to maintain order.

Yet, even in the passage that is often appealed to, Romans 13, we clearly see that the church and the state are never thought of as blending roles. In other words, a “church person” would never simultaneously be a governmental leader (at least, not for long) as Paul saw things. You can’t wear two hats, a religious one and a secular governmental one, and follow Jesus. Jesus invites us to count all things as rubbish besides knowing him.

So, in this heated election season, I’m convinced that any discussions about which candidate is more “Christian” is mere folly. On the surface, Obama clearly wins this discussion (even if some conservatives would consider his faith as outside the bounds of orthodoxy). I personally don’t doubt the sincerity of Obama’s Christian faith, but when it comes to following Jesus, he fails on all issues pertaining to his role as Commander-in-Chief (head of the military). Perhaps here we need to make a clear (grace-filled) distinction between being a Christian and following Jesus in all areas of discipleship.

Faithfully following Jesus in all obvious areas of discipleship and being President is impossible in our current system. For this reason, I don’t think we need to worry about which faith a candidate subscribes to. If you vote, which I’m still uncertain about, cast a ballot for the person who will do a better job for the most vulnerable in our world. See a vote as the lesser of two evils and nothing more. Don’t waste time worrying about if the candidate is Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Mormon, or unaffiliated. Remember, it’s impossible to follow Jesus in this one basic matter of discipleship (nonviolent love) and to be the President of the United States.



*To be clear, I am not saying that it is impossible for someone to serve in a violent profession and to be a Christian. I know many Christians who are in the Army, Navy, police force, and in government office. I think they are wrong on how they read the Bible on this issue, but I would never call them non-Christians. In this article I try to make a distinction between being a “Christian” and being a follower of the way of discipleship in Jesus Christ. Someone is neglecting an element of discipleship if they resort to violence. That is my point. It is not a judgmental point, but one that comes from a posture of grace and love.

**I realize that this shift, although drastic, was gaining momentum in some sectors of the church prior to Constantine. However, those endorsing violent professions were considered outside of the mainstream of the fold.

***I don’t wish to make the connection between soliders and drug dealers or porno film makers. I simply used this as a drastic example to make my point clear. I know many soldiers that have excellent character and I would never paint them as bad people. We just read the New Testament and the history of the early church differently.

Kurt Willems (M.Div., Fresno Pacific) is an Anabaptist writer preparing for a church planting project with the Brethren in Christ. He writes at: the Pangea Blog and is also on Twitter and Facebook.

Print Friendly

About the Author

Kurt Willems

Kurt WillemsKurt Willems (M.Div., Fresno Pacific) is the founding pastor of Pangea Communities - a movement of peace, justice, & hope. The church plant, in partnership with the Brethren in Christ and Urban Expression, is based in Seattle, Wa. Kurt writes at The Pangea Blog and is also on TwitterFacebook, and Google+.View all posts by Kurt Willems →

  • Not disagreeing with you, but what about Paul’s name dropping of Christians at Rome in Romans 16; one of the names is that of a government worker:

    “Erastus, who is the city’s director of public works, and our brother Quartus send you their greetings.” (16:23b)


  • Frank

    Agreed! The most vulnerable in our society are the unborn. There is nothing Christian about supporting a party that has abortion on demand in its platform. So yes vote for the most vulnerable and stop the killing!

    • peggy

      That is your opinion on the “most vulnerable”. Should I show you pictures of children who are tortured, orphaned and maimed by war? There is nothing pro-life or Christian about that. If you are so supportive of unborn children, then put your money there. Personally support a single mother. Give her the money she needs to raise her child well. Then I’ll believe you are speaking from your heart. Until then, I believe you are manipulated by the people who want to make you their puppet.

      • Drew

        Frank thinks trolling constitutes action. I think he may be surprised to find out that is not the case.

      • Frank

        Speaking of puppets. Hi!

        I hope everyone who votes Democratic sleeps well tonight knowing that you supported the killing of over 21,000 innocent lives each week,most for reasons of convenience. There is nothing Christian about that but hey you have the right to choose to kill or not according to our current laws. Throw a party while all those innocent eyes stare at you and wonder why you abandoned them in the name of Jesus.

        • People like yourself are the reason why atheism is on the rise.

          Fundamentalist Christianity is the greatest cause for atheism in America today.

          • SamHamilton

            Fundamentalist Christianity is the greatest cause for atheism in America today.

            As disrupting as Frank is getting, I don’t really think this is true. Although, I don’t know what you mean by “fundamentalist.”

          • Drew

            Actually, I have to agree with Ryan, and I think you demonstrated his point beautifully when you say Frank is disruptive.

            Most agnostics and atheists, when you tell them about Christ, love Christ. Their biggest problem with Christianity are the Christians that represent Christianity, to paraphrase Ghandi. Jesus talks about this in Matthew. We are to be the salt and light to the world, a city on a hill. But what happens when we lose our saltiness or light (ie, when we lose our distinctiveness as Christians, and become co-opted by the world)? We are no good. So when Frank worships the Republican Party and makes the Republican Party more important than Christ, when Frank is disruptive, when Frank becomes an internet troll, it does not help the cause of Christ.

            Where I disagree with Ryan is that this is not due to Fundamental Christianity, but rather a segment of Fundamental Christianity that worships politics over the Gospel, and this can be seen on the left as well among Liberal Christians.

          • SamHamilton

            I get what you’re saying about some Christians making an idol out of Republican politics, I just don’t know what it has to do with “fundamentalist Christianity.”

            I took Ryan to mean that Christians who care passionately about abortion are people who turn others towards atheism. I thought that’s what he meant by “fundamentalist.” But perhaps he meant it to mean “people who give priority to a political party rather than Jesus.” But if that’s the case, that’s almost exactly the opposite of what a Fundamentalist is. So I assumed he was using the term in the more common form, as a prerogative to describe anyone who’s socially conservative.

          • Drew

            Well, the Christians that are making an idol out of Republican politics are typically Evangelical or Fundamentalist Christians. It’s not an indictment of the theology, although I could see how it could appear that way.

          • SamHamilton

            I took it as an indictment of people who care passionately about abortion. They are not the main reason people become atheists.

          • Drew

            Frank has never once talked passionately about abortion. He has talked passionately about the Republican and Democrat parties, he has talked passionately about politics and legislation, but he has never once talked about abortion in regards to discussing Scripture or taking action. When Frank talks passionately about abortion, I will be very excited to listen.

          • SamHamilton

            Good points!

        • Drew

          You worship the U.S. Republican Party (TM) so it’s not surprise you are disappointed. I worship Jesus, so no matter what political party is in my power, I am okay.

  • John

    I think keeping what Christ has said in mind, we should be much slower to accuse or label our brothers/sisters (Mathew 5:22). I agree that the killing of 21,000 babies per week is an atrocity that should cause us all to seriously think about abortion, as is the fact that 30,000 children died of starvation last night as I slept. I am deeply afraid that when the judgement day comes I will be held accountable for the parts I played in both of these heinous situations. Lord forgive me a sinner. It’s when we think that we are no longer culpable for a problem that we begin to search for the ‘other’ people who are.

Read previous post:
A Politics of Selflessness

BY: JOSHUA D. AMBROSIUS -- As we vote, let us consider our own, our candidate’s, our party’s commitments to...