“The land is mine” (the importance of Leviticus 25:23)

As the debate rages within Christianity over what the Bible teaches about economic “fairness,” a key chapter to peruse is Leviticus 25, which introduces the concept of the year of the jubilee that Jesus proclaims in His Nazareth sermon in Luke 4. An amazing line in Leviticus 25:23 jumped out at me as I was perusing it this week. It’s the justification God gives His people for redistributing all their property and freeing all their slaves every 50 years: “The land is Mine, and you reside in My land as foreigners and strangers.” I believe that this sentence is a paradigm for understanding the whole gospel and a potential foundation from which we should consider every social issue we face in our world.

First, in a metaphorical sense, this sentence captures the gospel, because in the kingdom of God, we are illegal aliens granted amnesty by the blood of Christ. We have absolutely no right to inhabit God’s kingdom; we deserve for God to leave us in the outer darkness so that we won’t contaminate the perfect holy, peaceful place to live that God has created. But God wants us to live in His holy peace as aliens who are both naturalized and reminded of our complete dependency on grace by the mark of Jesus’ cross on our hearts. It is only as Christ-naturalized aliens that we can avoid contaminating God’s holy peace. We could not inhabit God’s kingdom as un-alien citizens without trying to make His kingdom ours, tailoring our moral/ethical systems to affirm and justify what is already our natural way of being as well as condemn whatever “other” we define ourselves against, and then building apartheid walls to keep the “other” out. (Oh wait a minute, that’s exactly what many of us do already, because we see Jesus’ sacrifice as our entitlement rather than our gift!)

It requires constant meditation on the gift of the cross not to forget our eternal status as naturalized aliens and live in the perpetually humble reverence of the gift that rebukes every sense of entitlement which rises up in our hearts. Once we are grounded in this basic understanding of our eternal condition, there is no reason that Leviticus 25:23 doesn’t also apply to all of our daily life circumstances as well, which is of course the context in which it appears in the jubilee passage. God, what do we do if one of our neighbors has a drinking problem and loses all his money so that he has to sell his family into slavery? Do they get freed in the year of jubilee? The land is Mine, and you reside in My land as foreigners and strangers. What about if I buy my neighbor’s tent and flip it for a 100% profit? Does he get it back when jubilee comes? The land is Mine, and you reside in My land as foreigners and strangers.

Verses 35-37 are remarkable in their prohibition of economic practices that we take for granted as being just part of how the economy works: “If any of your fellow Israelites become poor and are unable to support themselves among you, help them as you would a foreigner and stranger, so they can continue to live among you. Do not take interest or any profit from them, but fear your God, so that they may continue to live among you. You must not lend them money at interest or sell them food at a profit.” Zero-percent interest loans, selling food at cost? Are you kidding me? The land is Mine, and you reside in My land as foreigners and strangers.

Imagine if our attitudes about the issues facing us today were grounded in this basic presumption of who the Earth belongs to. What would be our attitude about the environment knowing that the land is God’s? How would we talk about illegal immigrants knowing that we too are foreigners and strangers in God’s land? What about intellectual property right disputes when scientists discover how to manipulate the natural processes for which God deserves the patent?

So much of how our world is currently constructed draws on a view of reality in which the land does not belong to God. It belongs to whoever has the money to buy it or the family that has always owned it. The absence of God’s name from the title of our property is definitively what makes us a secular world. Obviously, the sinfulness of human nature causes our society to need walls and locked doors in order for us to live safely. And we need a border patrol too. As Robert Frost wrote, “Good fences make good neighbors.” But part of being Christian in a secular world requires perpetually resisting the privatization of our consciousness. How can we live in such a way that we constantly bear witness to the truth that this world belongs to God and we are mere foreigners within it granted passage only by His grace? The degree to which we live by that truth is the degree to which we inhabit God’s kingdom instead of the fallen world He has called us to rise beyond.

—-
Morgan Guyton is the associate pastor of Burke United Methodist Church in Burke, Virginia, and a Christian who continues to seek God’s liberation from the prison of self-justification Jesus died to help him overcome. Morgan’s blog “Mercy Not Sacrifice” is located at http://morganguyton.wordpress.com. Follow Morgan on twitter at www.twitter.com/maguyton.

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

Print Friendly

About the Author

Morgan Guyton

Morgan GuytonMorgan Guyton is the associate pastor of Burke United Methodist Church in Burke, Virginia, and a Christian who continues to seek God’s liberation from the prison of self-justification Jesus died to help him overcome. Morgan’s blog “Mercy Not Sacrifice” is located at http://morganguyton.wordpress.com. Follow Morgan on twitter at www.twitter.com/maguyton.View all posts by Morgan Guyton →

  • Benjamin

    Oh please, is anyone really denying that God wants us to give what we have to others?
    Just because we don’t think the government is perfect doesn’t mean we are against charity. 

    • http://morganguyton.wordpress.com/ mguyton

      Who’s the “we” in your question? Charity refers to giving what I want to when I feel like it. It’s justice when I recognize that what I have is God’s and has been given to me for the purpose of distributing it to others and using it for my family’s sustenance according to His will.

      • Benjamin

        By using words like “redistribution” or “distribute” it seems to me you are trying to connect this to government run economic systems, which is where I think I would be most likely to hear those sorts of words with regards to money.
        Why don’t you use the word “give”?
        Did you have no intention of putting such meaning into the article?

        And where is the debate on charity?
        Do you have some problem with the word charity?
        Honestly?

        “Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver. ” 2 Corinthians 9:7

        • Benjamin

          All I’m saying is I’m not sure where you could get a problem with the idea of charity, and where you get government economic systems out of this.

          • http://morganguyton.wordpress.com/ mguyton

             I don’t think I’m arguing for a centralized government vs. a localized non-profit-based system. I would prefer the latter, but until people unlearn their selfishness and ungratefulness, the voluntary giving is not going to add up to what is needed. Our attitudes have to change regardless of whether taking care of the poor is a public or private initiative.

          • Benjamin

            What do you mean they won’t add up?
            You mean they DON’T add up?
            Or are you trying to give the old; “You must change the system! The system!” rant, where nobody is allowed to suggest the idea that people become more charitable?

        • Benjamin

          That’s NIV

        • http://morganguyton.wordpress.com/ mguyton

           Read also Romans 13 where Paul tells us to honor the government and pay our taxes. He was living under a far more oppressive government than we will ever have to. 2 Corinthians 9:7 describes the attitude the giver ought to have; it’s not weighing in on the question of appropriate tax rates.

          • Benjamin

            And where did I imply we should give taxes?
            Obviously if laws are in place to pay more taxes we should. Still, living in a democracy I think we have some choice over how much taxes to create. That is my concern here.

    • Macroman

      The Isrealites were also required to give 10% to God and not glean the fields.  What was left from the harvest was for the poor to glean (5-10% of harvest).  Every 7th year you were required to leave the field fallow and not tend it (15%).  In this culture this mean that for example wheat would be growing in the field from the stray kernels you missed.  This also was for the poor.  This was an agrarian society so nearly everyone was a farmer of some sort. You were providing approximately 30-35% for the priests and the poor before you paid any other taxes to the government.  Some how Benjamin I doubt that you are providing 30-35% of your income to the poor and the church before the taxes.  Remember this was God’s commanded not an option.

      Land was wealth at the 50th year all land was to revert back to the families that originally owned it.  Poor families sold into slavery were released and given back the families land.

      We have in the western world families that have wealth that is so vast that if they did not give it away it would not be exhausted for hundreds of years.  Having worked with young people in University for 10 years and industry for 25 I can say this type of wealth is not necessarily good for the recipients.  How can we redress this in society and reflect how God commanded it in the only nation in which He created the rules?

      • mike

        The tithe was their income tax and they went to Jerusalem and threw a party.  The spent some of the tithe on them selves.  Also some of us do pay a 30% income tax, not to mention gas tax, property tax, sales tax, state tax etc. etc.

      • Benjamin

        We can address this issue by dealing with it personally and trying to encourage more charity.

  • mike

    We give the poor in America food stamps, public education, WIC program, public housing, medical care, public libraries, Social Security and the tax income earned credit.  Not to mention the chararties that abound.  Also there are other benefits  thet the poor can receive in this country.  Yet we are constantly told that its never enough and we are a bad people(country) because we do not give enough.

    • http://morganguyton.wordpress.com/ mguyton

      So you’re saying that you think that all the government services that the poor currently receive should be preserved?

      • mike

        Of course, there should be a safety net. Not a hammock but a net.  For those who can not help themselves then a hammock.  

  • http://fatcatwatch.wordpress.com FatCatWatch

    But Jesus wasted expensive perfume >$100,000 (in today’s $) on his feet, surely that means it’s ok for us to have expensive stuff and why would God have put all that Crude Oil in the ground, if he didn’t want me to drive an SUV?   I am so sick and tired of leftist Christians trying to deny the evidence of God’s Blessing on my life when I cruise on my Super Yacht.  Only a small minority will get to heaven probably about the 1% mark.

  • http://www.facebook.com/herbsquare Herb Square

    I believe it is possible to live freely in the grace of God and experiencing  the victorious truths spoken about us receiving the spirit of adoption, being seated with Christ- being joint-heirs with Him.  This is not a denial of our brokenness and dependence  on the cross but an affirmation of it.  Agreeing with God about who He says we are.  Isn’t the triumphant proclamation of the Kingdom brought by Jesus a more potent reality for the transformation of this present darkness than that of being strangers? 

  • Barclay

    A fellow Israelite – does that now equate to a fellow Christian rather than a fellow countryman, since the commonality is our Faith/Chosenness in God??

  • Me2

    Sorry, it’s not written in Red letters…

  • http://hopingforfigs.wordpress.com/ Michael Killick

    It seems much of the discussion has focussed on how to live, how to give, the role of government – but the strength of Morgan’s article is that it addresses something deeper – who we are. It is for each of us to figure how to express that and to respect how others express it. Well done Morgan for finding some red letters in the OT!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Z5G73FDSYH6WSQPGFB4K5MJPXQ Journal

    Nice! Never new there was so much good stuff in Leviticus! check out this one

    L 25:45
    You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and
    members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your
    property.

×

TRENDING: 5 God Excuses to Avoid After A Natural Disaster>>