Red Letter Christians

Waiting For St. Benedict: Where Does Occupy Wall Street Go From Here?

by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove Monday, October 24th, 2011

A couple of weeks ago, the Occupy Wall Street protests looked like a typical gathering of disgruntled young people, not unlike protests outside WTO or World Bank gatherings over the past decade. But as this movement has grown, its public image has quickly become more diverse. I saw a picture last week of a middle-aged woman holding a sign that said, ‘You know things are bad when a librarian starts protesting.’ An article yesterday quoted a retired woman from New Jersey who said she knew she had to go to Wall Street when a friend sent her a note about it on Facebook. She arrived to find hundreds of people like her.

As it grows more diverse, this public demonstration of discontent with our society’s economic system is also spreading beyond Wall Street. It’s rippling out to Main Streets in cities and towns across the country where those who claim to be part of the ’99 percent’ overlooked and forgotten by corporate elites are standing together to be counted. It’s hard to say how long these protests will last or what they will lead to, but this much is clear: we’ve reached a tipping point. The masses who gave an unprecedented amount of their own money to a campaign for ‘Change We Can Believe In’ are not satisfied with the change they have seen. No one knows for sure what our world will look like ten years from now, but a growing number of people are determined that it cannot look the same as it does now.

Ten years after radical extremists violently attacked New York’s financial district, a mass movement of nonviolent citizens are occupying the same territory to express their discontent. When the ‘war on terror’ began, it was pitched as a defense of the American way of life. But Americans are increasingly aware that unprecedented debt levels, an anemic job market, and cut backs in public services have not improved their way of life. What’s more, a passion for peace and justice stirs in many souls as they cry out against the disproportionate suffering of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan and the extreme disparity between our country’s ‘struggling economy’ and the grinding poverty of the two-thirds world. A nation that invests billions in war while cutting teacher’s aids from public school classrooms cannot last. A world where over half the population lives in the slums of megacities while CEO’s fight to keep their vacation homes must change.

The world as we know it is coming to an end. We’re all aching for the world-to-come.

But the question is how to get there. Even if everyone recognizes a problem, that doesn’t guarantee that anyone knows how to fix it. Clearly, those vying for power to shape the world-to-come are legion. And they will inevitably disagree on ways and means in the human struggle that we are facing. But for many of us who believe that another world is already interrupting the status quo, the most important thing isn’t to occupy the centers of power and insist on economic reform. The crucial thing is to carve out spaces where we can begin to create a new society within the shell of the old.

These spaces are being crafted and cultivated by people in co-op movements, in local currency experiments, in cost-sharing health care ministries, and in slow food collectives. In small ways that are admittedly incomplete, some people who are discontent with the world that is are stepping out to begin shaping another world with their daily economic decisions. Not all of them are ‘people of faith,’ but there is a radical faith behind their actions. They are trusting a system other than what they have known and seen. They are believing and living toward a new reality.

USA Today reported earlier this year that a growing number of young evangelicals are opting to live on less so that they can do work that has meaning–work that often gives back to their communities and serves the poorest among us. These young people are finding that they can live full and meaningful lives at or below the national poverty level when they share housing with friends, live among the poor they work with, and learn to enjoy simpler pleasures. Some of these people call themselves ‘new monastics’ because they are looking to ancient communal wisdom for guidance in their economic experiments.

Early in the 6th century, when the Roman Empire faced attacks from without and discontent from within, there came a point when most people knew that things had to change but no one was certain what would come next. About that time, a middle-class young Italian named Benedict left his home in Nursia to go to school in Rome only to find that the Empire which had been centered there was almost completely gone. In a moment of clarity, Benedict saw that the system of education which had been designed to prepare him for a world that was passing away could only lead to a dead end. While it could teach what had worked in the past, the system did not have the resources to present a way forward. A different kind of school was needed. Benedict went to a cave, built himself a prayer cell, and so enrolled in the university of the world-to-come.

What came of his studies was a short document called The Rule of Saint Benedict. It was originally written to serve a few communities in Italy and might have easily been lost, as hundreds of documents like it no doubt were. But it wasn’t. Instead, it became a spiritual classic and one of the most important texts in Western civilization.

The power of Benedict’s Rule was this: in a world that was falling apart, it gave structure to small communities of faith that could experiment in a new kind of community. It did not aim to restore Rome to its former glory or even to reform the church. The Rule simply offered people a way to live a vision of life together rooted in service, humility, and love. Throughout the Dark Ages, the Rule guided communities that existed as points of light in a sea of dark despair. By some estimates, it was the monks who saved civilization. At the very least, they established hospitals and sowed the seeds of democracy in Western culture.

In his now classic analysis of Western civilization, After Virtue, philosopher Alasdair McIntyre wrote that ‘we are not waiting for Godot, but for a new and doubtless very different Saint Benedict.’ But maybe it’s time to stop waiting. Maybe we should turn our attention to the small communities of people who believe another world is possible and have invested their whole lives in that conviction. Maybe it’s time to end the occupation and begin living a new economy in the places where we are.

—-
Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove is the author of The Wisdom of Stability: Rooting Faith in a Mobile Culture. He is an author, speaker, and activist who currently resides in Raleigh, NC at the Rutba House. You can reach him at his website, www.jonathanwilsonhartgrove.com

Sponsor a Child in Jesus Name with Compassion

PrintFriendly
  • http://georgepwood.com/2011/10/24/the-world-wide-religious-web-for-monday-october-24-2011/ The World Wide (Religious) Web for Monday, October 24, 2011 « GeorgePWood.com

    [...] BACK HOME? “Waiting For St. Benedict: Where Does Occupy Wall Street Go From Here?” [...]

  • http://thalabyhalabyl.allergiesaid.com/2011/10/24/alastair-mcintyre/ Alastair mcintyre | Thalabyhalabyl

    [...] Red Letter Christians » Waiting For St. Benedict: Where Does … [...]

  • Matt

    It seems I ask this question an awful lot on this site.

    Will someone please provide me with a concrete example as to what this new way of politics and economics will look like? The only thing I pulled out of this is that we should all be living communally…not exactly a practical solution to any problems facing this world.

    And if I may be so bold, I would like to say I already know what your examples of reform would be. They would mirror a lot of the reforms that radical leftists are pushing for, the result being something in between Russia 1917 and the modern-day “open” China. I would just really love to hear, or I suppose read, someone here actually say what they want to say.

    Posts like this are full of nice, colorful, and hopeful language but there is very little substance. It reads like this, “We want change, but we aren’t going to tell you what changes.” “We want a new economic and poltical paradigm, but we aren’t going to elaborate as to what that is.”

    There is the obvious and logical choice. Perhaps the Wall Street protesters and their supporters are on the wrong side of the issue? Maybe they are wrong? Maybe they are the ones that are pushing for a perverse and twisted economic and political reality?

    Either way, I’m waiting for some specific examples of reform. Feel free to provide answers.

  • Koop1975

    I suspect there are a number of ideas from this article you could pursue if you were honestly looking for an answer to your question. Begin with “These spaces are being crafted and cultivated by people in co-op
    movements, in local currency experiments, in cost-sharing health care
    ministries, and in slow food collectives.” Food and health care co-ops, Credit Unions, etc all exist in the real world now, and many people (including conservatives) take advantage of them.

    Beyond that, you seem to have miscast the author here with some broad generalizations. Perhaps it’s less about proposing a concrete legal, economic, and cultural revolution, and more about encouraging individual revolutions – to live simpler, be more fruitful with one’s labor, and give more generously of the fruits. In other words, “…opting to live on less so that they can do work that has meaning–work
    that often gives back to their communities and serves the poorest among
    us. These young people are finding that they can live full and
    meaningful lives at or below the national poverty level when they share
    housing with friends, live among the poor they work with, and learn to
    enjoy simpler pleasures.”

  • Amy

    I love everything that you are saying in this article, and have seen/been a part of “these spaces” of “a new reality”, – I think there is great hope in these spaces.
    But I still think we need to fight to improve the greater systems/governments in which we are a part of. Although some might fight it all day long, it is a fact that we are all still controlled by the systems we live within, at least to a degree. 
    And if we believe in ‘new realities’ it will certainly take a both/and approach to create a fuller version of it. 

  • ange

    Matt, to your post “Posts like this are full of nice, colorful, and hopeful language but there is very little substance.”

    I can’t agree more with you.

    This world IS complex, what this artical’s suggesting is much too simple. Though it does have a nice ‘ring’ for those who want to think, ‘oh there’s an easy fix to all of this!’.  What these Occupiers want is a change to our global financial model which in itself is terribly flawed and unsustainable. They’re coming together and putting their voices together. We don’t know where it will lead us, in terms of a change to how the global economy is to be re-shaped. But what the Occupiers are doing, is powerful, and you can’t bag that.

  • SpeedyGonzales

    What happened at in Acts 2nd  Chapter?  What happened with the Azusa movement in the early years of the 1900′s? This a Christian Blog and with a movement of the Holy Spirit all can be conquered with examples from the Bible and our own history leading the Way. If we are trully Believers our answer is Prayer. The Bible states that Faith without deeds is dead. Where is our Faith followed by those Biblical deeds? This is a time for action without fear
    for ours is the Kingdom of Heaven and We are children of God.
    It is so hard to realize that in death we have victory over Satan. This isn’t to say we should run to our death but to know as the Bible states Death has no sting. How exciting for Christians, the human race is looking for answers and we have it dwelling in each and every believers soul in form of the Holy Spirit.
    Read Acts and about the Azusa movement. It can start in small committed groups just as the Wall Street movement. Spend some kneel time, God is available

  • http://jesusjusticeandjargon.blogspot.com/ Schuyler stallcup

    Why don’t you learn about the community that Jonathan lives in? It’s a pretty good example. Or try reading The Irresistible Revolution or Jesus for President by Shane Claiborne. If you really want some concrete examples, try looking into the lives of our brothers and sisters who are living it out.

  • Matt

    Co-ops. collectives, and accepting poverty as a way of life isn’t a reasonable solution for me. If there are those that wish to live that lifestyle, more power to them. That’s their choice. But for anyone to say that is a model for large scale economic recovery and human progress is just folly.

    And I’ve read Claiborne’s stuff. For the most part, his writings are more closely related with Marx and Ingels than anything to do with religious thought.

    Which brings me to my point. The Occupy crowd and the Emerging Church Mvmt that supports them is not talking about that small-scale stuff. They too are arguing for massive political and economic change. This blog site is full of examples to back up what I’m saying.

    I understand that its a matter of opinion (I suppose I don’t have to read this site, but I get a kick out of it) but I don’t believe that these proposed changes are one, economically sound, or two, based on Christian-theology. Leftist political theory has, throughout modern history, led to the decimation of the human spirit, the destruction of indiviudal liberty, and the pillaging of any sense of economic stability. To argue for their adoption in the U.S. is just silly. And then to cover the political motivations of your arguments behind Christianity and “helping the poor” is manipulative and, frankly, wrong. 

  • http://jesusjusticeandjargon.blogspot.com/ Schuyler stallcup

    Co ops and the new monastic movement may not be a reasonable solution for you, but they are Biblical (see Acts). And you’re absolutely right that they aren’t large scale. That’s the point. “The Kingdom of God is like a mustard seed.” “We cannot do great things on this Earth, only small things with great love.” People in the new monastic movement do not believe that the world will be changed through governments, but through small acts of love and service. I hate big government and it sounds like you do too, so I would think you’d love the new monastic movement. 

    As for the emerging church supporting OWS, I don’t know if that is fair to say, considering we really have no way of even knowing who is part of the emergent church as it isn’t anything official. Certainly there are some who consider themselves “emergent” who have supported OWS, but not all or probably even most. I think many in the Church have resonated with OWS’s opposition to consumerism and environmental destruction, but have found that they lack a true solution. I’d say most of us feel that “massive political change” not only wouldn’t be effective, but might not even be possible. We believe that change — though whether or not it will be enough change to be considered successful by the world’s standards, we do not know nor care — will come through the love and service of individuals and small communities. And wait a minute…isn’t that exactly what Jonathan was saying in the article? <—–That's some leftist political theory right there, if I've ever seen it. 

    I do find it exciting that so many are starting to become aware of the brokenness of the system. Even if they haven't found the solution, recognizing the problem is the first step. 

    I know I'm probably just a fake-Christian leftist to you and so you probably won't hear what I'm saying. I've seen your other comments on this site and you don't seem to interested in hearing what other people have to say and engaging in genuine, honest, and loving dialogue. But I thought I'd give it a whirl anyway. 

     

  • http://kingdomofgodworship.com/2011/10/red-letter-christians-%c2%bb-waiting-for-st-benedict-where-does/ Red Letter Christians » Waiting For St. Benedict: Where Does … – Kingdom of God Worship Blogs
  • Anonymous

    This article troubles me because it is looking at the OWS movement as an ideal, but not the reality of what is really going on at these encampments. Here’s a link to a posting on Occupy Oakland: 
    http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2011/10/24/is-occupy-oakland-as-bad-as-they-say/?We need to evaluate what is going on by the fruit produced, not just by what personal desires we want to overlay on top of what’s happening. 
    Is what’s happening at these protests really what Benedict would be pleased with? Is this what his rule would produce? 

  • Jhcos-osb

    Hello everyone, I’m new here but feel like I want to chime in.  I’m an Episcopal Benedictine monk whose community could be called one of the “New Monastics” as we are solitaries/anchorites and do not live in a traditional cenobitic community.

    Here’s what I want to say:  Monastics are by nature more akin to Socialism than Capitalism (and before anyone throws the Nazi lable at me, let me point out that Helen Keller was a registered Socialist and no one would call her a Nazi).  Monastic life is a more radical idea today than it was in the 6th century when city states, villages and regional identities were the norm, rather than our modern mega cities.  It really has little to do with faith or a lack of faith but much more to do with a loss of respect, support and genuine concern for one’s fellows.  People have become so “me first at all costs” that there is no room or time for understanding our global responsibility to each other and our planet.

    I think what the author is trying to point out is the example the RB advocates is the concept of It Takes a Village, a proven historical remedy for impending colapse.  It’s setting aside the Me First and Foremost attitude and accepting the fact that we are all in this together.  In current times it doesn’t mean adpoting isolationist behaviours and attitudes….quite the contrary. 

    For those that keep saying “this sort of thing isn’t practical” and “where are the practical solutions?” I would say “Indeed, where is your solution since you feel the ones put forward will not work?”  What we’re talking about is a radical movement toward love of our fellows and our planet.  God can be left completely out of the equation if you are not a person of faith.  It’s a matter of respecting the dignity of all people.

    May peace be with your all!

  • Koop1975

    Sorry, but a photo-essay from a notoriously right-wing outfit (which could essentially be FoxNews’ blog division) which cherry-picks and captions a few dozen images from one gathering does not make a persuasive critique of the movement as a whole. 

  • Anonymous

    So, are the images lies? It they’re true, they’re true, regardless of the source. If the Daily Kos published 15 photos of Tea Party members – at a Tea Party rally – with vile, racist, homophobic posters proudly displayed, should we discount the photos because of the source? I say no. There are too many images shown to discount them as “cherry picked”. In order for ideas to be taken seriously, their advocates need to be committed to truth and integrity.

    ________________________________

  • Koop1975

    Who knows if they’re “true”? What is the accountability mechanism? 

    Beyond that, the bigger point (which you’ve conveniently ignored) is that this collection of photos with captions can’t be taken seriously as a so-called “critique” of a very widespread and diverse movement. Since you like analogies, imagine the Daily Kos publishing those 15 photos of one Tea Party rally in Mississippi with those vile, racist, homophobic posters. Can I legitimately post something like…”Is what’s happening at these rallies really what (?) would be pleased with? Is this what their values and principles produce?”

    I say no.

  • Anonymous

    OK, I’m game – let’s go with your analogy. If there was a rotten Tea Party rally in Mississippi (or where ever), I would want all/any Tea Party person(s) to denounce the people involved and disavow the actions as antithetical to the principles of the Tea Party movement. Anything less sullies the reputation of all involved in something like this. 

    As for “Who knows if they’re true?”, if this was an isolated incident not open to public scrutiny, that could be a legitimate concern. Things like this are happening at Occupy protests all over the country – check out that right-wing rag the New York Times for reports of all sorts of fun stuff happening at OWS (public defecation! whoo hoo!)

    My bigger point with my first post was about judging a movement/protest/whatever by it’s fruit – by what is actually happening on the ground – not the theories and intents of the people involved. Over the years I have heard Communism described as beautiful in theory, but always devolving into totalitarianism when put into practice. 

    The beautiful “theory” of the Rule of St. Benedict resulted in the beautiful “practice” of the Benedictine monasteries. Since this article makes a connection between the Occupy movement and Benedict, I think it is fair to bring not only the theory, but the practice into the comparison of the two.

  • http://www.christianhumanist.org/chb/2011/10/project-link-way/ Project Link-Way – Links – books Communism Homer Saint Benedict social justice – The Christian Humanist Blog

    [...] Saint Benedict, Occupy Wall Street, and… Saint Benedict and WHAT? [...]

  • Jennifer Nolan

    Those pictures from Occupy Oakland look a lot like the camp on Dewey Square in Boston, my nearest Occupy site.  True, these people are not handsome (Americans generally aren’t).  There may be drug use, especially pot.  But that “narcotics baggie,” the “money counter,” and so on do not persuade me.  Good, honest charities count wads of cash every day of the week, and then they spend most of it as they say they will — on people and animals in need; maybe those Occupiers are doing the same thing, by their supporters’ lights.  The “baggie” is a typical nail or screw container from one of those “to be assembled” toy or appliance kits; it’s been stapled to the pallet: it wouldn’t make a very good drug baggie now.  You have to find a real problem with these Occupy campsites; the fact that most of these people are slobs with behavioral health problems no longer puts them on the outs with many or most working Americans.  Our corporate oligarchy, on the other hand, has gotten these multitudes of voters fed up.

blog comments powered by Disqus